Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Remote Sensing Group GOME-202-2 slit function analysis PM2 Part 2: Changes – theta_d_0 & SFS shape R. Siddans, B. Latter,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Remote Sensing Group GOME-202-2 slit function analysis PM2 Part 2: Changes – theta_d_0 & SFS shape R. Siddans, B. Latter,"— Presentation transcript:

1 Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Remote Sensing Group GOME-202-2 slit function analysis PM2 Part 2: Changes – theta_d_0 & SFS shape R. Siddans, B. Latter, B. Kerridge RAL Remote Sensing Group 26 th June 2012 RAL

2 Remote Sensing Group GOME-2 FM202-2: PM2 Slit function analysis Overview of slit-function fitting method New results for FM202-2 (WP2100) - use of new angular parameters from TNO - modification of source line shape to match commissioning measurements Comparisons of results: - FM202-2 to FM202-1 - FM202-2 1mm to FM202-2 0.5mm Error analysis for FM202-2 Discussion re next steps, date of next meeting (FP) AVHRR/GOME-2 co-location, spatial aliasing and geo- referencing (Ruediger Lang) © 2010 RalSpace

3 Remote Sensing Group Measurement setup: 2004: FM202-1 Echelle angles –1.0mm: 73.6-78.376 –0.5mm: 76.0 – 77.188 2012: FM202-2 Echelle angles (same) –1.0mm: 73.6 - 78.376 –0.5mm: 76.0 – 77.284 © 2010 RalSpace

4 Remote Sensing Group SFS predicted wavelengths After PM1, TNO provided updated theta_d_0 & scaling factors (per dataset) Their fitting method meant problems with FPA1 due to low signal (dataset 6 bad) For theta_d_0, FPA3&4 used. For scaling_factor, FPA 2-4 used © 2010 RalSpace v1v2 Dataset 6

5 Remote Sensing Group TNP theta_d_0 & scaling_factor 1 mm measurements theta_d_0 meanscaling factor datasetstart angleend anglestep sizeall FPAFPA1FPA2FPA3FPA4FPA3 &4all FPAsFPA2-4Comments 1-15.2-14.3840.02488.1188.1788.11 88.188.1050.999976460.99997755nice 2-14.384-13.4480.02488.0988.1288.1188.0988.0888.0851.00000851.0000102nice 3-13.424-12.7040.02488.0888.0588.0888.0788.0988.081.0000191.0000207nice 4-12.704-12.0320.02488.1288.1888.1188.1388.1188.120.999940310.9999416nice 5-12.032-11.60.02488.2288.388.22 88.288.210.999706240.99972192 ? Discard extreme angles? 6-16.4-15.4640.02488.1387.8788.15 88.1288.1351.0010830.99985179FPA1 differs very much from the rest here. 7-15.464-15.1280.02488.1288.1788.1488.11 0.999918290.99991769 all 88.0888.188.0988.08 1.00001871.0000203 0.5 mm measurements theta_d_0 meanscaling factor datasetstart angleend anglestep sizeall FPAFPA1FPA2FPA3FPA4FPA3 &4all FPAsFPA2-4Comments 1-14-13.8920.01288.1187.888888.0688.1388.0950.999915440.99991609 2-13.88-13.7120.01288.0488.1288.0788.0388.0288.0251.0000851.0000855 3-13.724-13.5440.01288.188.1688.188.0588.0888.0650.999984330.99998516 4-13.544-13.4360.01287.7487.7687.7387.7187.7487.7251.00080821.0008088very flat curve, hard to find minimum residuals 5-13.436-13.3160.01287.9887.9187.9388.06 1.00000681.0000073 6-13.304-13.1840.01288.0688.188.0988.0188.0488.0251.0000871.0000874Not a nice curve to find minimum for theta_d_0 7-13.184-13.0160.01288.2388.2788.2888.288.2188.2050.999665190.99966569 8-13.016-12.8480.01288.2388.2488.2688.2288.2388.2250.999606120.99960629 9-12.836-12.7160.01288.3588.3888.4988.3188.2988.30.999437710.99943845Hard to fit theta_d_0! Not much difference in residuals all 88.1288.1188.1288.1388.1188.120.999854680.99985521 © 2010 RalSpace Error from FPA1 weak signal

6 Remote Sensing Group 2004 SFS line shape © 2010 RalSpace Modelled Measured(2004) Modelled Measured(2004) 254nm 297nm 300nm 543nm 633nm 1mm slit only

7 Remote Sensing Group 2012 SFS line shape change © 2010 RalSpace Modelled (2004) Measured (2012) 543nm 1mm 633nm 1mm 543nm 1mm 633nm 1mm 633nm 0.5mm 633nm 0.5mm Modelled (2012) Measured (2012) 633nm 1mm 543nm 1mm

8 Remote Sensing Group Laser measurements: Gaussian broadening “The line shape of the SFS lines is influenced by the internal alignment of the stimulus. For the FM2-2 measurements the SFS was taken out of storage and realigned. The alignment was not perfect, resulting in a more Gaussian line shape.” Bad measurment file: –[2010-12-13]_[18_04_34]_FM2_SLITFUN-05EXP-000062-EXP_77.295998.avgfile SFS changes: –Ghosts - Same grating, but didn’t match FM203. Ref. Angle? –From SFS commissioning report, neighbouring peak seems to modify slit peak wavelength as well as shape and wings? © 2010 RalSpace

9 Remote Sensing Group TNO SFS analysis © 2010 RalSpace

10 Remote Sensing Group Change in SFS from diff order © 2010 RalSpace

11 Remote Sensing Group Check ghosts? Values from 2004 © 2010 RalSpace

12 Remote Sensing Group SFS note from MO-TR-TPD-GO-0114 © 2010 RalSpace

13 Remote Sensing Group Example retrieval results

14 Remote Sensing Group © 2010 RalSpace FM202-2 Initial retrievals and test (PM1): FM202_2_0_5 FPA2 (band 2) pix 304-328

15 Remote Sensing Group © 2010 RalSpace FM202-2 Updated parameters (PM2): FM202_2_0_5 FPA2 (band 2) pix 304-328

16 Remote Sensing Group © 2010 RalSpace FM202-2 Updated parameters (PM), Gauss SFS: FM202_2_0_5 FPA2 (band 2) pix 304-328

17 Remote Sensing Group Retrieval as 633nm (laser wls) © 2010 RalSpace


Download ppt "Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Remote Sensing Group GOME-202-2 slit function analysis PM2 Part 2: Changes – theta_d_0 & SFS shape R. Siddans, B. Latter,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google