Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byEdwina Andrews Modified over 9 years ago
2
Project Planning and Budgeting
3
Recall the four stages Project Definition and Conceptualization Project Planning and Budgeting Project Execution and Control Project Termination and Closeout
4
Ch 17 - 2 Elements Of Project Management Project team –individuals from different departments within company Matrix organization –team structure with members from different functional areas depending on skills needed Project manager –leader of project team
5
Ch 17 - 3 Project Planning Statement of work –written description of goals, work & time frame of project Activities require labor, resources & time Precedence relationship shows sequential relationship of project activities
6
WORK BREAKDOWN 1
7
WORK BREAKDOWN 2
8
GANTT CHART
9
Ch 17 - 4 © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Simplified Project Network 132 Construct formsPour concrete
10
NETWORK CHART 1
11
NETWORK CHART 2
12
Ch 17 - 5 Elements Of Project Planning Define project objective(s) Identify activities Establish precedence relationships Make time estimates Determine project completion time Compare project schedule objectives Determine resource requirements to meet objective
13
Ch 17 - 6 © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Work breakdown structure (WBS) –determine subcomponents, activities & tasks
14
Ch 17 - 7 © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Gantt Chart Popular tool for project scheduling Graph with bar for representing the time for each task Provides visual display of project schedule Also shows slack for activities –(amount of time activity can be delayed without delaying project)
15
Ch 17 - 8 2 0 41068 31579 Month Activity Design house and obtain financing Lay foundation Order and receive materials Build house Select paint Select carpet Finish work A Gantt Chart
16
Ch 17 - 9 CPM/PERT Critical Path Method (CPM) –DuPont & Remington-Rand (1956) –deterministic task times –activity-on-node network construction Project Eval. & Review Technique (PERT) –US Navy, Booz, Allen & Hamilton –multiple task time estimates –activity-on-arrow network construction
17
Ch 17 - 10 The Project Network Network consists of branches & nodes 132 Branch Node
18
Ch 17 - 11 Network Construction In AON, nodes represent activities & arrows show precedence relationships In AOA, arrows represent activities & nodes are events for points in time An event is the completion or beginning of an activity A dummy shows precedence for two activities with same start & end nodes
19
Ch 17 - 12 © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Project Network For A House 124 6 7 3 5 3 2 0 1 3 1 1 1 Lay foundation Design house and obtain financing Order and receive materials Dummy Finish work Select carpet Select paint Build house
20
Ch 17 - 13 Critical Path A path is a sequence of connected activities running from start to end node in network The critical path is the path with the longest duration in the network Project cannot be completed in less than the time of the critical path
21
Ch 17 - 14 All Possible Paths A: 1-2-3-4-6-7 3 + 2 + 0 + 3 + 1 = 9 months; the critical path B: 1-2-3-4-5-6-7 3 + 2 + 0 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 8 months C: 1-2-4-6-7 3 + 1 + 3 + 1 = 8 months D: 1-2-4-5-6-7 3 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 7 months
22
Ch 17 - 15 © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Concurrent Activities 4 3 2 Dummy Lay foundation 2 3 Lay foundation Order material Incorrect precedence relationship Correct precedence relationship
23
Ch 17 - 16 © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Early Times (House-building example) ES - earliest time activity can start Forward pass starts at beginning of CPM/PERT network to determine ES times EF = ES + activity time –ES ij = maximum (EF i ) –EF ij = ES ij + t ij –ES 12 = 0 –EF 12 = ES 12 + t 12 = 0 + 3 = 3 months
24
Ch 17 - 17 © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Computing Early Times –ES 23 = max (EF 2 ) = 3 months –ES 46 = max (EF 4 ) = max (5,4) = 5 months –EF 46 = ES 46 + t 46 = 5 + 3 = 8 months –EF 67 =9 months, the project duration
25
Ch 17 - 18 © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Late Times LS - latest time activity can start & not delay project Backward pass starts at end of CPM/PERT network to determine LS times LF = LS + activity time –LS ij = LF ij - t ij –LF ij = minimum (LS j )
26
Ch 17 - 19 © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Computing Late Times –LF 67 = 9 months –LS 67 = LF 67 - t 67 = 9 - 1 = 8 months –LF 56 = minimum (LS 6 ) = 8 months –LS 56 = LF 56 - t 56 = 8 - 1 = 7 months –LF 24 = minimum (LS 4 ) = min(5, 6) = 5 months –LS 24 = LF 24 - t 24 = 5 - 1 = 4 months
27
Ch 17 - 20 © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Early And Late Times 124 6 7 3 5 3 2 0 1 3 1 1 1 ( ) ES=0, EF=3 LS=0, LF=3 ( ) ES=3, EF=5 LS=3, LF=5 ( ) ES=5, EF=5 LS=5, LF=5 ( ) ES=5, EF=8 LS=5, LF=8 ( ) ES=6, EF=7 LS=7, LF=8 ( ) ES=8, EF=9 LS=8, LF=9 ( ) ES=3, EF=4 LS=4, LF=5 ( ) ES=5, EF=6 LS=6, LF=7
28
Ch 17 - 21 © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Activity Slack Activities on critical path have ES=LS & EF=LF Activities not on critical path have slack –S ij = LS ij - ES ij –S ij = LF ij - EF ij –S 24 = LS 24 - ES 24 = 4 - 3 = 1 month
29
Ch 17 - 22 © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Activity Slack Data ActivityLSESLFEFSlack (S) 1-2*00330 2-333550 2-443541 3-4*55550 4-565761 4-6*55880 5-676871 6-7*88990 * Critical path
30
Ch 17 - 23 © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Probabilistic Time Estimates Reflect uncertainty of activity times Beta distribution is used in PERT b - a 6 ( ) Variance: 2 = a = optimistic estimate m = most likely time estimate b = pessimistic time estimate Where, 2 Mean (expected time): a + 4m + b 6 t =
31
Ch 17 - 24 © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Example Beta Distributions m = t ba P (time) ba tm b mta
32
Ch 17 - 25 © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e PERT Example 1 2 4 6 7359 8 Manual Testing Dummy System Training Dummy System Testing Orientation Position recruiting System development Equipment installation Equipment testing and modification Final debugging System changeover Job training
33
Ch 17 - 26 © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Activity Information 1 - 268108.44 1 - 336961.00 1 - 41353.44 2 - 50000.00 2 - 6 241252.78 3 - 5 2343.11 4 - 53454.11 4 - 82222.00 5 - 7371171.78 5 - 82464.44 7 - 80000.00 6 - 914741.00 7 - 91101394.00 Time estimates (wks)Mean Time Variance Activityabct 2
34
Ch 17 - 27 © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Early And Late Times 1 - 280.4408191 1 - 361.0006060 1 - 430.4403252 2 - 500.0088991 2 - 6 52.7881316218 3 - 5 30.1169690 4 - 540.1137592 4 - 820.0035141611 5 - 771.789169160 5 - 840.4491312163 7 - 800.00131316163 6 - 941.00131721258 7 - 994.00162516250 Activityt 2 ESEFLSLFS
35
Ch 17 - 28 © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Network With Times 1 2 4 6 7359 8 ( ) ES=8, EF=8 LS=9, LF=9 ( ) ES=6, EF=9 LS=6, LF=9 ( ) ES=3, EF=5 LS=14, LF=16 ( ) ES=0, EF=3 LS=2, LF=5 ( ) ES=0, EF=6 LS=0, LF=6 ( ) ES=0, EF=8 LS=1, LF=9 3 8 0 5 4 4 7 0 2 93 6 ( ) ES=3, EF=7 LS=5, LF=9 4 ( ) ES=9, EF=13 LS=12, LF=16 ( ) ES=9, EF=13 LS=9, LF=16 ( ) ES=13, EF=13 LS=16 LF=16 ( ) ES=13, EF=25 LS=16 LF=25 ( ) ES=13, EF=25 LS=16 LF=25 ( ) ES=8, EF=13 LS=16 LF=21
36
Ch 17 - 29 © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Project Variance Project variance is the sum of variances on the critical path
37
Ch 17 - 30 © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Probabilistic Network Analysis Determine probability that project is completed within specified time where = t p = project mean time = project standard deviation x = proposed project time Z = number of standard deviations x is from mean Z = x -
38
Ch 17 - 31 © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Normal Distribution Of Project Time = t p Timex ZZ Probability
39
Ch 17 - 32 © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Probabilistic Analysis Example What is the probability that the project is completed within 30 weeks?
40
Ch 17 - 33 © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Determining Probability From Z Value Z0.000.01...0.09 1.90.47130.4719…0.4767............ = 25 Time (weeks) x = 30 P( x<= 30 weeks) = 0.9719
41
Ch 17 - 34 © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e What is the probability that the project is completed within 22 weeks? = 25 Time (weeks) x = 22 P( x<= 22 weeks) =0.1271
42
Ch 17 - 35 © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Project Crashing Crashing is reducing project time by expending additional resources Crash time is an amount of time an activity is reduced Crash cost is the cost of reducing the activity time Goal is to reduce project duration at minimum cost
43
Ch 17 - 36 © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e House-building Network Activity times in weeks 124 6 7 3 5 1212 8 0 4 1212 4 4 4
44
Ch 17 - 37 © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Normal Activity And Crash Data 1-2127$3,000$5,0005$400 2-3852,0003,5003500 2-4434,0007,00013,000 3-4000000 4-5415001,1003200 4-612950,00071,00037,000 5-6415001,1003200 6-74315,00022,00017,000 $75,000$110,700 Total NormalCrashAllowableCrash TimeTimeNormalCrashCrash TimeCost per Activity(wks)(wks)CostCost(wks)Week
45
Ch 17 - 38 © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Network With Crashing Costs 124 6 7 3 5 12 8 0 4 4 4 4 $7,000 $500 $3,000 $400 $200 Activity 1-2 can be crashed a total of 5 weeks for $2000 Crash cost per week = Total crash cost/Total crash time = $2,000/5 = $400 per week
46
Ch 17 - 39 © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Normal And Crash Relationships 12426810140 1,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 7,000 2,000 6,000 $ Weeks Crashed activity Normal activity Crash cost Normal cost Crash timeNormal time Slope = crash cost per week
47
Ch 17 - 40 © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Crashing Solution 1-21275$400$2,000 2-38535001,500 2-44303,0000 3-400000 4-54102000 4-612937,00021,000 5-64102000 6-74317,0007,000 12$31,500 NormalCrash Crash Crash Crashing TimeTimeTimeCost perCost Activity(wks)(wks)UsedWeekIncurred
48
Ch 17 - 41 © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Crashed Project 124 6 7 3 5 12 7 8 5 0 4 3 12 9 4 4 4 3 Original time Crashed times
49
Ch 17 - 42 © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Time-Cost Relationship Crashing costs increase as project duration decreases Indirect costs increase as project duration increases Reduce project length as long as crashing costs are less than indirect costs
50
Ch 17 - 43 © 2000 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 3/e Time-Cost Tradeoff Cost ($) Project Duration Crashing Total cost Indirect cost Direct cost Time Minimum cost = optimal project time
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.