1. Réunion de présentation des besoins 10 Nov. 2006 1 Joël MICHAUD French expertise in SiC for large telescopes

2. Réunion de présentation des besoins 10 Nov. 2006 2 Joël MICHAUD SiC technology Technology promoted and developped by French industry for more than 10 years for space applications. Technology renowned in the whole world. All developments in europe including a large telescope are currently manufactured with SiC technology. –Herschel telescope, diameter 3.5 m, mass 300 kg –Aladin lidar (wind), diameter 1.5 m, mass 72 kg –Primary GAIA mirror, off axis aspherical, 1.45 x 0.55 m, 36 kg

3. Réunion de présentation des besoins 10 Nov. 2006 3 Joël MICHAUD Key advantages of SiC technology Very high weight reduction thanks to an exceptional stiffness of the material (~5 times higher than aluminium or Zerodur) Optical material, very good specularity of SiC CVD (Chemical Vapor Deposition) Homogeneous material with a cristalline structure, low CTE (Coefficient of Thermal Expansion) and high thermal conductivity, usable on a large thermal range (0K – 1800K) High mechanical stiffness permitting to manufacture the structure in SiC The material is insensitive to radiation and humidity Existing industrial facilities and mature technology to manufacture large parts. Assembling technology controled –  high eigen frequencies possible, robust thermal control, stability, robustness of manufacturing and modelisation, all SiC telescope performance preserved at cryogenic temperatures

4. Réunion de présentation des besoins 10 Nov. 2006 4 Joël MICHAUD Achievements examples, all SiC design ROCSAT2 Telescope, launched in 2004 600 mm diameter Telescope mass 70 kg Osiris telescope (Rosetta mission launched in 2004) 150 mm diameter Operational temperature -100/+70°C Herschel telescope (ESA program) 3.5 m diameter, 80 µm to 670 µm, no CVD) Cryogenic temperature (~80 K) Primary mirror mass 210 kg (22 kg/m²)

5. Réunion de présentation des besoins 10 Nov. 2006 5 Joël MICHAUD Achievements examples AEOLUS/ALADIN (ESA program, Wind Lidar 360 nm) Telescope delivery 2005, launch 2008 1.5 m diameter, no CVD Primary mirror mass 50 kg (28 kg/m²) GAIA (ESA program) M1 mirror delivery 2005 1.45 x 0.55 mirror off axis CVD Primary mirror mass 36 kg

6. Réunion de présentation des besoins 10 Nov. 2006 6 Joël MICHAUD Proposal for a SNAP PASO Study

7. Réunion de présentation des besoins 10 Nov. 2006 7 Joël MICHAUD Plannification of PASO Studies PASO Studies are decided on an annual basis A preselection of studies have been proposed, including SNAP Study Resources for preselected studies are being evaluated (human CNES resources and/or cost) A final choice will be done before end of year considering availability of CNES technical services and financial allocations Next slides describe a proposition for this SNAP study

8. Réunion de présentation des besoins 10 Nov. 2006 8 Joël MICHAUD Purpose of the SNAP PASO Study Assess a possible french participation to SNAP mission –Spectrometer supply –Optical Telescope Assembly (OTA) supply –Other supply –ROM cost Better understand Weak Lensing (WL) problematic through an iteration between scientific requirements and induced outcomes on second level requirements and telescope design –Work has still to be done to clearly establish relations between Weak Lensing requirements and design features at all levels (mission, system, spacecraft, instrument, optics, etc …), as it is not straighforward –To make a good proposal means to clearly understand the requirements.

9. Réunion de présentation des besoins 10 Nov. 2006 9 Joël MICHAUD Expectations A possible proposal for a french participation to SNAP mission –Technical outline –Technical solution –ROM cost A french expertise on Weak Lensing problematic An enhance french scientific contribution to SNAP team A PASO report including –Proposal for enhanced Weak Lensing requirements –A scenario for a telescope design consistent with Weal Lensing and Supernovae requirements –PSF models to allow iterations between technicians and scientists –A detailed cost estimate for the telescope supply. An expertise for the spectrometer development in LAM

10. Réunion de présentation des besoins 10 Nov. 2006 10 Joël MICHAUD Study schedule Phase 0.1: Requirements and design options, required interface SNAP data –Study kick off (French scientific group, CNES/partners) –Progress meetings –Phase 0.1 Key Point (French scientific group, CNES/partners, SNAP team invited) Phase 0.2: Telescope design options studies, PSF modelisation, ROM cost –Progress meetings –Phase 0.2 and final Key Point (French scientific group, CNES/partners, SNAP team invited)

11. Réunion de présentation des besoins 10 Nov. 2006 11 Joël MICHAUD Phase 0.1 Tasks –Analyse current SN and WL requirements –Analyse SNAP current design –Analyse current telescope requirements –Confirm or complete WL requirements (with scientists) –Update telescope requirements if necessary –Define or complete SNAP/OTA interface (ICD) –Define relations between WL requirements and design options –Propose telescope design options –Elaborate scenarios for WL requirements versus design options –Define the outline of a PSF modelisation List effects to be taken into account Define PSF modelisation depth Define the SNAP/OTA interface data needed for the PSF modelisation –Define the PSF calibration process outline

12. Réunion de présentation des besoins 10 Nov. 2006 12 Joël MICHAUD Phase 0.1 Outputs –Options for the telescope design –PSF modelisation method –Calibration process outline –Exchange data format between scientists and technical team (for PSF for instance) –Preliminary SNAP/OTA Interface (ICD) –Needed data from SNAP US team (SNAP/OTA interface data), specificaly for PSF modelisation General mission data (scanning laws, orbit simplified model …) Spacecraft simplified general thermal model Focal plane detailed thermal/thermoelastic model Detectors characteristics (charge diffusion, ….) Attitude control characteristics and features (jitter amplitudes, frequencies and orientation, …) Etc… –Phase 0.1 Key Point presentation

13. Réunion de présentation des besoins 10 Nov. 2006 13 Joël MICHAUD Phase 0.2 Tasks –Study telescope design options –Elaborate a PSF modelisation including OTA effects and external effects –Analyse the sensitivity of Weak Lensing performances to telescope design features and PSF shape (iterative process between engineers and scientists) –Define the PSF calibration process –Confirm WL requirements at all levels –Make recommandations on the design (confirmations or alternatives) At system level (scanning, WL/SN observation sequences, etc ….) At spacecraft level (thermal, attitude control, instrument,…) At instrument level (Focal Plane/Optics interface, …) At telescope and spectrometer level (proposed design options) –Define needed Research and Technology anticipating program –Estimate the cost for a french participation to SNAP

14. Réunion de présentation des besoins 10 Nov. 2006 14 Joël MICHAUD Phase 0.2 Outputs –PSF models –A Weak Lensing sensitivity analysis (from french scientific group) –A PASO report including A proposal for a telescope and spectrometer design for SNAP, with the justification of chosen technical options The definition of a calibration process and the associated requirements Telescope and spectrometer performances budgets Risk analysis Costs TRL level for telescope and spectrometer items and needed Research and Technology actions –A phase 0.2 Key Point presentation

15. Réunion de présentation des besoins 10 Nov. 2006 15 Joël MICHAUD Organisation French scientific group CNES team (Statement of work study follow up Interface) Technical team SNAP team Statement of work/Follow up Key point organisation SNAP/OTA interface data supply Study Proposal Needed SNAP/OTA inteface data Progress meetings Final technical report PSF models Telescope design definition Spectrometer expertise Scientific requirements Calibration process design (WL) WL sensitivity analysis Scientific requirements Calibration process design (WL) Final PASO report Scientific requirements SNAP/OTA interface data supply SNAP/OTA interface data CNES Program and strategy department (study client) Final PASO report SNAP study request Proposal for a french participation to SNAP

16. Réunion de présentation des besoins 10 Nov. 2006 16 Joël MICHAUD Tentative Schedule FebAugJulJunMayAprMarSeptOct Phase 0.1 Phase 0.2 CENA Ph01 KP PASO Report Ph02 KP KO Ph0.1 2007 CENA : Commission d’Engagement des Nouvelles Affaires KO : Kick-Off KP : Key Point DecJanNov Instruction/Statement of work Présentation 2006

17. Réunion de présentation des besoins 10 Nov. 2006 17 Joël MICHAUD About this proposal Activities, organisation, schedule in these slides are only suggestions for a statement of work preparation They are subject to changes due to –SNAP team comments –LAM and French scientific group comments –PASO activities and funding –Availability of CNES technical teams