Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byTracy Burke Modified over 9 years ago
1
Regulation of Superoxide Radicals in Escherichia coli Sara H. Schilling 2007
2
University of St. Thomas
3
To learn more about the regulatory systems that protect E. coli bacteria cells from harmful superoxide radicals Overall Goal www.science.howstuffworks.com
4
Why? Information about protective systems in E. coli can be applied to understand similar systems in humans
5
Superoxide Radicals in E. coli Fe 2+ + O 2
6
Superoxide Radicals in E. coli Fe 2+ + O 2 Fe 3+ + O 2 Radicals damage DNA, creating mutations
7
Breakdown of Superoxide Radicals SOD 2O 2 + 2H +
8
Breakdown of Superoxide Radicals SOD 2O 2 + 2H + H 2 O 2 + O 2
9
Gene Expression DNA sodA
10
Gene Expression DNA mRNA Transcription sodA
11
Gene Expression DNA Protein mRNA TranscriptionTranslation sodASOD
12
Protein Regulation sodA gene SOD protein
13
Protein Regulation Fur sodA gene SOD protein
14
Previous Research Fur activates sodA transcription (Schaeffer, 2006)
15
Previous Research Fur activates sodA transcription (Schaeffer, 2006) Fur sodA gene MORE SOD protein
16
Previous Research Fur activates sodA transcription (Schaeffer, 2006) Fur sodA gene MORE SOD protein Fur regulates sodA transcription when there are Fe +2 and many superoxide radicals present (Rollefson, et al. 2004)
17
Forms of Fur Description Zn 2 FurFur with zinc ions at each binding site Zn 1 FurFur with one zinc ion and one open binding site Fe 3+ FurFur with a zinc ion and a ferric ion at the binding sites Fe 2+ FurFur with a zinc ion and a ferrous ion at the binding sites
18
Forms of Fur Description Zn 2 FurFur with zinc ions at each binding site Zn 1 FurFur with one zinc ion and one open binding site Fe 3+ FurFur with a zinc ion and a ferric ion at the binding sites Fe 2+ FurFur with a zinc ion and a ferrous ion at the binding sites
19
Forms of Fur Description Zn 2 FurFur with zinc ions at each binding site Zn 1 FurFur with one zinc ion and one open binding site Fe 3+ FurFur with a zinc ion and a ferric ion at the binding sites Fe 2+ FurFur with a zinc ion and a ferrous ion at the binding sites
20
Forms of Fur Description Zn 2 FurFur with zinc ions at each binding site Zn 1 FurFur with one zinc ion and one open binding site Fe 3+ FurFur with a zinc ion and a ferric ion at the binding sites Fe 2+ FurFur with a zinc ion and a ferrous ion at the binding sites
21
Forms of Fur Description Zn 2 FurFur with zinc ions at each binding site Zn 1 FurFur with one zinc ion and one open binding site Fe 3+ FurFur with a zinc ion and a ferric ion at the binding sites Fe 2+ FurFur with a zinc ion and a ferrous ion at the binding sites
22
First Goal To compare activation of sodA transcription in the presence of the three metal-ion complexes of Fur: Zn 1 Fur Zn 2 Fur Fe 3+ Fur
23
First Hypothesis Based on the research by Rollefson, et al. (2004), I hypothesized that Zn 2 Fur would be the metal-ion complex of Fur that most activates sodA transcription
24
Second Goal To determine the effect of Fur concentration on activation of sodA transcription: 0 nM 50 nM 100 nM 150 nM 200 nM
25
Second Hypothesis Based on research by Shaeffer (2006), I hypothesized that increased Fur concentration would increase activation of sodA transcription
26
Third Goal To determine the root of and eliminate the negative control signaling that was present in the Schaeffer study
27
Third Goal To determine the root of and eliminate the negative control signaling that was present in the Schaeffer study Fourth Goal To optimize DNA band signaling by modifying the Schaeffer Protocols
28
Methods—PCR Polymerase Chain Reaction Diagramed used by permission from K. Shaeffer
29
Methods—Transcription DNA PCR Purification Transcription in Presence of the Three forms of Fur at Increasing Concentration Negative Controls Constructed mRNA
30
Methods—Reverse Transcription mRNA Reverse Transcription Negative Controls Constructed cDNA PCR Amplified cDNA
31
Methods—Gel Electrophoresis Photo by Author
32
Methods—Visualization VersaDoc Camera Photo by K. Shaeffer used with permission
33
Results — sodA transcription of Zn 1 Fur Lane 1-2: sodA transcribed in absence of Zn 1 Fur, Lane 3-4: sodA transcribed in presence of 50 nM Zn 1 Fur; Lane 5-6: sodA transcribed in presence of 100 nM Zn 1 Fur, Lane 7-8: sodA transcribed in presence of 150 nM Zn 1 Fur, Lane 9-10: sodA transcribed in presence of 0 nM Zn 1 Fur
34
Results — sodA transcription of Zn 1 Fur Lane 1-2: sodA transcribed in absence of Zn 1 Fur, Lane 3-4: sodA transcribed in presence of 50 nM Zn 1 Fur; Lane 5-6: sodA transcribed in presence of 100 nM Zn 1 Fur, Lane 7-8: sodA transcribed in presence of 150 nM Zn 1 Fur, Lane 9-10: sodA transcribed in presence of 0 nM Zn 1 Fur
35
Results—sodA transcription with Fe +3 Fur Lane 1-2: sodA transcribed in absence of Fe 3+ Fur, Lane 3-4: sodA transcribed in presence of 50 nM Fe 3+ Fur; Lane 5-6: sodA transcribed in presence of 100 nM Fe 3+ Fur, Lane 7-8: sodA transcribed in presence of 150 nM Fe 3+ Fur, Lane 9-10: sodA transcribed in presence of 0 nM Fe 3+ Fur
36
Results—sodA transcription with Fe +3 Fur Lane 1-2: sodA transcribed in absence of Fe 3+ Fur, Lane 3-4: sodA transcribed in presence of 50 nM Fe 3+ Fur; Lane 5-6: sodA transcribed in presence of 100 nM Fe 3+ Fur, Lane 7-8: sodA transcribed in presence of 150 nM Fe 3+ Fur, Lane 9-10: sodA transcribed in presence of 0 nM Fe 3+ Fur
37
Results — sodA Transcription with Zn 2 Fur Lane 1-2: sodA transcribed in absence of Zn 2 Fur, Lane 3-4: sodA transcribed in presence of 50 nM Zn 2 Fur; Lane 5-6: sodA transcribed in presence of 100 nM Zn 2 Fur, Lane 7-8: sodA transcribed in presence of 150 nM Zn 2 Fur, Lane 9-10: sodA transcribed in presence of 0 nM Zn 2 Fur
38
Results—Negative Controls Initial Trial Lanes 1-3: positive controls, Lane 4: negative control (without Master Mix), Lane 5: negative control (without RT primers), Lane 6: empty, Lane 7: negative control (without cDNA), Lanes 8-10: positive controls
39
Results—Negative Controls Initial Trial Lanes 1-3: positive controls, Lane 4: negative control (without Master Mix), Lane 5: negative control (without RT primers), Lane 6: empty, Lane 7: negative control (without cDNA), Lanes 8-10: positive controls No cDNA
40
Results—Negative Controls Transcription Assay Components Lane 1: NTP-initiator mixture, Lane 2: RT primer #2, Lane 3: RT primer #3, Lane 4: negative control (without NTP- initiator mixture), Lane 5: negative control (without mRNA), Lane 6: negative control (without DNase), Lane 7: dNTP mixture, Lane 8: positive control Lane 1-2: empty, Lane 3: DNase, Lane 4: RNA polymerase, Lane 5: negative control (without DNA), Lane 6: RNase inhibitor, Lane 7: empty, Lane 8: negative control (without cDNA)
41
Results—Negative Controls Signaling Components Run with DNase Lane 1: positive control, Lane 2: empty, Lane 3: RNase inhibitor incubated with DNase, Lane 4: NTP-initiator mixture incubated with DNase, Lane 5: 0.5 L RNA polymerase incubated with DNase, Lane 6: 2.0 RNA polymerase incubated with DNase, Lane 7: RNase inhibitor, NTP- initiator mixture, and RNA polymerase incubated with DNase, Lane 8: DNA incubated with DNase
42
Results—Negative Controls Signaling Components Run with DNase Lane 1: positive control, Lane 2: empty, Lane 3: RNase inhibitor incubated with DNase, Lane 4: NTP-initiator mixture incubated with DNase, Lane 5: 0.5 L RNA polymerase incubated with DNase, Lane 6: 2.0 RNA polymerase incubated with DNase, Lane 7: RNase inhibitor, NTP- initiator mixture, and RNA polymerase incubated with DNase, Lane 8: DNA incubated with DNase Positive Control
43
Results—Negative Controls Constructed during RT-PCR Lane 1: positive control used in the negative controls (originally run in Figure 9, Lane 1), Lane 2: positive control (originally run in Figure 4, Lane 2), Lane 3: negative control (without mRNA, RT primers 2 and 3, reverse transcriptase, and dNTP mixture), Lane 4: negative control (without RT primers 2 and 3), Lane 5: negative control (without reverse transcriptase), Lane 6: negative control (without mRNA), Lane 7: negative control (without dNTP mixture), Lane 8: negative control (without cDNA), Lane 9: negative control (without Master Mix), Lane 10: negative control (without cDNA or RT primers)
44
Results—Protocol Optimization PCR Products with Different Concentrations of Primers Lane 4: PCR product containing 4 L of sodA primers; Lane 6: PCR product containing 1 L of sodA primers; Lane 8: PCR product containing 8 L sodA primers
45
Results—Protocol Optimization PCR Products with Different Concentrations of Primers Lane 4: PCR product containing 4 L of sodA primers; Lane 6: PCR product containing 1 L of sodA primers; Lane 8: PCR product containing 8 L sodA primers 4 L
46
Results—Protocol Optimization PCR Products with Different Concentrations of Primers Lane 4: PCR product containing 4 L of sodA primers; Lane 6: PCR product containing 1 L of sodA primers; Lane 8: PCR product containing 8 L sodA primers 8 L
47
Results—Protocol Optimization PCR Products with Different Concentrations of Primers Lane 4: PCR product containing 4 L of sodA primers; Lane 6: PCR product containing 1 L of sodA primers; Lane 8: PCR product containing 8 L sodA primers 1 L
48
Discussion—First Goal Hypothesis neither supported nor refuted -sodA transcription in presence of Zn 2 Fur unsuccessful Zn 1 Fur most activated sodA transcription To determine what form of Fur most activates sodA transcription
49
Future Work—First Goal Repeat sodA transcription in presence of Zn 2 Fur Perform sodA transcription in the presence of other metal-ion complexes of Fur
50
Discussion—Second Goal Hypothesis correct -Activation of sodA transcription did increase with Fur concentration To determine the effect of Fur concentration on sodA transcription
51
Discussion—Third Goal Partially successful -Negative control signaling present -Cause of signaling determined to originate during process of RT-PCR To eliminate and determine the cause of negative control signaling
52
Future Work—Third Goal Determine what in RT-PCR is causing the signaling - Examine each component of the RT-PCR assay
53
Discussion—Fourth Goal PCR product with 1 L of each sodA primer produced the best signaling –Amplification protocol was modified to reflect the optimization To optimize the Shaeffer PCR Protocol
54
Applications of Research Break down more harmful superoxide radicals
55
Applications of Research Break down more harmful superoxide radicals Fur – sodA interaction may serve as model in human systems
56
Applications of Research Break down more harmful superoxide radicals Fur – sodA interaction may serve as model in human systems May lead to synthesis of drugs that model regulatory proteins and modify expression of genes
57
Acknowledgements Dr. Kathy Olson University of St. Thomas Chemistry and Biology Departments Mrs. Lois Fruen Dr. Jacob Miller Team Research
58
Regulation of Superoxide Radicals in Escherichia coli Sara H. Schilling 2007
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.