1. Jan 16, 2004Tom Gaisser 1.3 Cost & schedule review The IceTop component of IceCube Area--solid-angle ~ 1/3 km 2 sr (including angular dependence of EAS trigger)

2. Jan 16, 2004Tom Gaisser 1.3 Cost & schedule review Outline Scientific goals Pictures of test-tanks & Doms, 03/04 Cost & schedule review –WBS structure & definitions –Schedule –Budget

3. Jan 16, 2004Tom Gaisser 1.3 Cost & schedule review IceTop: the surface component of IceCube A 3-dimensional air shower array for – Veto (i.e. tagging downward events) – Calibration – Primary composition from PeV to EeV – Calibration, composition analyses similar to SPASE-AMANDA but 5000 x larger acceptance wider energy range, better resolution IceTop at high altitude (700 g/cm 2 ) –125 m spacing between IceTop stations –E threshold ~ 300 TeV for > 4 stations in coincidence –Useful rate to EeV

4. Jan 16, 2004Tom Gaisser 1.3 Cost & schedule review Small showers (2-10 TeV) associated with the dominant  background in the deep detector are detected as 2-tank coincidences at a station. Detection efficiency ~ 5% provides large sample to study this background. Showers triggering 4 stations give ~300 TeV threshold for EAS array Large showers with E ~ 100-1000 PeV will clarify transition from galactic to extra-galactic cosmic rays.

5. Jan 16, 2004Tom Gaisser 1.3 Cost & schedule review IceTop station schematic Two Ice Tanks 3.1 m 2 x 1 m deep (a la Haverah, Auger) Coincidence between tanks = potential air shower Signal in single tank = potential muon Significant area for horizontal muons Low Gain/High Gain operation to achieve dynamic range Tank simulation with GEANT-4

6. Jan 16, 2004Tom Gaisser 1.3 Cost & schedule review Fill tanks Tank10 –Successful fill Nov 22 20 minutes to fill < 10 RPSC man hours for transport and filling Tank09 –Filled Nov 26

7. Jan 16, 2004Tom Gaisser 1.3 Cost & schedule review Cable runs looking toward MAPO away from SPASE Tank10 is on the right, Tank09 on the left. Power cable is on the left. There are 5 cables on the right: 2 freeze-control cables, two twisted quads for DOMS, and Stoyan’s cable to read temperatures during the winter. The latter is somewhat thicker than the other four.

8. Jan 16, 2004Tom Gaisser 1.3 Cost & schedule review 4 IceCube DOMs running From: SMTP%"john.kelley@usap.gov" 15-JAN-2004 15:56:19.45 To: icecube-c@ssec.wisc.edu Subj: First Four IceCube DOMs Deployed I'm pleased to report that the first four IceCube digital optical modules have been successfully deployed at the pole. They are currently frozen into two IceTop surface tanks, located near the SPASE building. The DOMs are operating normally, and we are looking forward to dark-adapting the tanks and taking real data. John Kelley, UW-Madison

9. Jan 16, 2004Tom Gaisser 1.3 Cost & schedule review WBS structure 1.3.2 IceTop –1.3.2.1 Tanks –1.3.2.2 Cables –1.3.2.3 DOMs –1.3.2.4 IceTop specific engineering 1.3.2.4.1 system design 1.3.2.4.2 detector simulations 1.3.2.4.3 Data acquisition –Integration of SPASE –IceTop management IceTop is the surface component of IceCube. By detecting cosmic-ray showers in coincidence with the deep detector it provides certain unique calibration and veto functions for neutrino astronomy in addition to permitting IceCube to function as a three-dimensional air shower array for study of cosmic-ray astrophysics up to PeV energies.

10. Jan 16, 2004Tom Gaisser 1.3 Cost & schedule review Tanks, DOMs, Cables 1.3.2.1 Tanks 1.3.2.2Cables 1.3.2.3 DOMs Design and build tanks; design and test freezing procedures to provide working ice-Cherenkov detectors for the surface array component of IceCube. Exclusion: Provision of water to fill the tanks is excluded because it will be an integral part of deployment (see 1.2.3.3.4 under 1.2.3.3 Field Season Operations). There is also a need for coordination with drilling (1.2.2) in connection with water supply. Tank deployment is under 1.2. Specification of cabling to power and monitor freezing, testing and operation of tanks. Exclusion: Cabling for tank DOMs should be included in the main surface cables (1.3.1.2). We assume the surface cable will include conductors suitable for monitoring the tanks and for providing power during deployment. (1.3.1.2) Connections from the DOMs to the surface cables must be Provided, as well as cables connecting the DOMs to each other.(1.3.1.2) Integration of optical modules into tanks. Exclusion: Construction of DOMs is excluded because the DOMs for IceTop will be part of DOM production runs (1.3.1.1). Design of modifications that may be needed for IceTop will be carried out in collaboration with 1.3.3 and 1.3.4 as part of IceTop specific engineering (1.3.2.4). Develop FAT & verification test for IceTop DOMs deployment and

11. Jan 16, 2004Tom Gaisser 1.3 Cost & schedule review 1.3.2.4 IceTop Specific Engineering 1.3.2.4.1 System design Engineering resources 1.3.2.4.2 Detector simulations 1.3.2.4.3 Data acquisition add.4.4 and.4.5 Design, Maintenance, calibration and operation of the surface component of IceCube to the extent that these require special procedures. IceTop is an integral component of the IceCube detector. To a large extent, both its hardware and software components are similar, if not identical, to those of the deep detector. This element includes integration of air shower detector calibration, DAQ, trigger, reconstruction and simulation into the corresponding IceCube processes. Develop engineering resources necessary for the design, verification, calibration and operation of IceTop components. This includes an IceTop instrumentation and development facility and a tank test station on campus at U of Delaware, a tank test station at UW River Falls, mobile test tanks and a tank test station at the SPASE. Develop simulations needed for IceTop design, verification, calibration and operation. Develop air shower simulations of common interest for IceTop and for simulation of backgrounds in the deep detector (in coordination with WBS 1.4.3). Design, specify and produce IceTop-specific DAQ firmware and software components, including triggering and feature extraction algorithms in the on-board FPGA and software for data handling, triggering and reconstruction. Specify requirements For IceTop mainboards, including any variations from mainboards to be used in ice. Coordinate with related activities in WBS elements 1.3.4, 1.4 and 1.5. e.g. simulation of tank response, simulations for triggering are in this WBS; simulations for background In IceCube are under 1.4.3.1

12. Jan 16, 2004Tom Gaisser 1.3 Cost & schedule review SPASE 1.3.2.5 Integration of SPASE 1.3.2.6 IceTop management Maintenance and operation of the existing SPASE air shower detector to the extent it remains useful as a calibration device for IceCube. Lower threshold subsample of coincidences; tank calibration Local project monitoring and reporting to project office.

13. Jan 16, 2004Tom Gaisser 1.3 Cost & schedule review Schedule PY3PY4PY5PY6PY7PY8PY9 Strings deployed 4 12 16 18 18 12 Tanks deployed 8 24 32 36 36 24 manufctd 8 24 32 96 (accel) Freeze units (*) 8 (+2?) 16 (+2?) 12 0 manufctd (accel) Assumes each freeze unit reused up to 5 times. Probably should add some extras

14. Jan 16, 2004Tom Gaisser 1.3 Cost & schedule review Hardware costs Capital –Tanks: 160 @ $6037=$965,920 –Frz units: 36 @ $6002= 216,072 –O’flow units 36 @ $ 561= 20,196 –Sunshade 36 @ $1922= 69,129 –Misc Tank Equip 38,550 –Test station Equip (inc. $45K at UWRF) 75,000 –4 test station tanks + ancillary equip 60,000 –Computer cluster180,000 Total capital$1,564,867 (+$60K)

15. Jan 16, 2004Tom Gaisser 1.3 Cost & schedule review Materials & supplies (inc shipping) + travel (both unburdened) 1.3.2.1 Tanks$ 18,850 –(not enough for shipping) 1.3.2.4.1 (Test stations) 31,000 1.3.2.4.3 –DAQ computers 27,000 reduce to $15K, move to.4.1 –Misc hardware 100,750 move to.4.1 1.3.2.5 -000- 1.3.2.6 48,000 (replacement work stns) Total M & S$225,600 Travel$549,000

16. Jan 16, 2004Tom Gaisser 1.3 Cost & schedule review Labor breakdown By institution person months (total project) – UD: 572, UW: 87, LBNL: 8, UWRF: 7 Individuals involved part-time Scientists: 13 1 0 1 Engrs, techs: 5 1 2 Labor cost by Project year (burdened) PY345678910 1.231.231.141.000.810.700.320.16 Total: $6.64 M