Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Quality Improvement in Reducing Infection: An Example from Edinburgh

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Quality Improvement in Reducing Infection: An Example from Edinburgh"— Presentation transcript:

1 Quality Improvement in Reducing Infection: An Example from Edinburgh
Claire L Smith Consultant Neonatologist Neonatal Unit, The Simpson Centre for Reproductive Health, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh

2 Neonatal infection: the significance
Is infection reduction a realistic target? The importance of data The Edinburgh experience Costs Challenges An ongoing journey

3 Late Onset Neonatal Infection

4

5 Is reducing late onset infection a realistic aim?

6 The optimal strategy for LOI reduction is uncertain
The Incidence of LOI varies widely Neonatal unit culture and practices differ The optimal strategy for LOI reduction is uncertain Learn from what other people are doing

7 Good Data Matters

8 How can you be sure you are doing something well if you don’t measure it?
Is anyone doing better- who are they and what are they doing differently? - Definitions Benchmarking Sharing experience

9 Our experience in Edinburgh

10 We thought we were doing OK.
We paid attention to infection control. We measured our infection rates. Hard to compare with literature: definitions The infection rates were fairly static Then we joined VON….. and benchmarked

11 Definitions Late onset infection: infection after day 3 of life
Pathogen or Fungal Coagulase negative staphylococcus: 5 days of antibiotics, accompanying clinical/laboratory signs

12 Rate of late-onset BSI VLBWs in 2010
106 admissions 40 had at least one episode of sepsis 31 had 1 episode 7 had 2 episodes 2 had 3 episodes CLABSI rate 23 per 1000 line days

13 Other = candida x 1 and pneumococcus x 1
Therefore 71% of all late onset infection in our NNU is CONS, again this appears to also be the case in other NNUs

14 Comparison with VON <30 weeks OR < 1500g
SCRH Any late infection 18% 38% Bacterial pathogen 10% 14% Coag Neg Staph 26% Fungal 2% 0%

15 Infection became our priority for improvement.

16 Neonatal QIP 2011-13 Convened MDT Review of QI literature Set targets
CoNS infection rates down to 5% Zero transmission of MRSA Zero MSSA bloodstream infections Zero fungal infection Actions Implementation of practice change Audit

17 Actions Improved hand hygiene
Expand concept of individual patient environment Reduce environmental reservoirs Stop movement of babies around unit Bathing and skin care Insertion and maintenance of peripheral and central lines Promotion of early enteral feeds with human milk Ventilator (nCPAP) associated pneumonia prevention Urinary catheter care Antifungal prophylaxis Insist on closed system for taking cultures Improved antibiotic stewardship Improved staffing levels Staff feedback

18 Hand hygiene and Patient Handling
Hand washing and alcohol gel Gloves for every patient contact in NICU (staff) CoNS skin carriage among NICU staff: likely cause for cross transfer of virulent strains References: V Hira et al. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2010 PC Ng et al. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2004 Pessoa-Silva et al. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2004 Bare below elbows Hair tied back No lanyards Blues No stethoscopes round neck

19

20 Environment: border control
Each baby has their own cot space: only enter if really necessary Hand gel when entering and leaving cotspace Dedicated pens/calculators/stethoscopes No paperwork moved between spaces Washable keyboards References: G French et al. Lancet 1998 Lu P-L et al. BMC Infectious Diseases 2009

21 Lines Line insertion bundle: aseptic checklist, 2 person technique
Line maintenance bundle – aseptic and non touch technique Cannulae – sterile pack, sterile gloves Skin preparation Limit use of central lines References: D Fisher et al. Pediatrics : e1664

22 Feeding Promotion of early enteral feeds Lactation support
Use of donor EBM Early enteral feeds > reduced use of lines and PN

23 Blood culture technique
Closed technique Butterfly needle and syringe Sterile pack and gloves Skin prep

24 Antibiotic policies Automatic stop orders Use of CRP
Revised empirical treatment based on local sensitivities Reduction of use of drugs requiring venepunture for monitoring

25

26 Staff Regular staff feedback Monthly run-chart displayed in NNU

27 Percentage of VLBW infants with LOI

28 Cost Many of measures low/no cost Staff Funding in this area important
Antibiotic bill has reduced significantly Fewer blood tests for antibiotic levels Reduced number of suspected infections

29 Cases of suspected infection

30 Going forward Continued data monitoring
Changing the way we present data In depth case review of all cases of CLABSI Random Safety Audits Periodic staff awareness drive – staff feedback is important

31 Key Challenges Measurement is key Staff awareness and engagement vital
Time Neonatal team dedicated and go the extra mile time and again – individual capacity New ways of working to incorporate patient safety and quality improvement into everyday practice. Share workload and avoid duplication

32 Conclusions QI initiatives can have a large effect size on reducing late onset infection Improved outcomes were accompanied by significant cost savings Our experience with this QI initiative has been invaluable in taking forward other QI initiatives in our NNU Continued measurement important

33 Any Questions?

34


Download ppt "Quality Improvement in Reducing Infection: An Example from Edinburgh"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google