Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Örebro-Stanford Cross-Cultural Rhetoric Workshop Rhetoric A meets Rhetorics of Art and Commerce Led by Anders Eriksson & John Peterson April 12, 2007 WGLN.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Örebro-Stanford Cross-Cultural Rhetoric Workshop Rhetoric A meets Rhetorics of Art and Commerce Led by Anders Eriksson & John Peterson April 12, 2007 WGLN."— Presentation transcript:

1 Örebro-Stanford Cross-Cultural Rhetoric Workshop Rhetoric A meets Rhetorics of Art and Commerce Led by Anders Eriksson & John Peterson April 12, 2007 WGLN Workshop

2 Carl Larsson (Swedish) 1853-1919 Norman Rockwell (American) 1894-1978

3 Instructions for Globally-Distributed Team Analysis and Presentation Group 1 (Green): Analyze “Santa Lucia” & “Freedom from Want”; present “Santa Lucia” Group 2 (Yellow): Analyze “Santa Lucia” & “Freedom from Want”; present “Freedom from Want” Group 3 (Red): Analyze “Girls in Mamma’s Room” & “Breaking Home Ties”; present “Girls in Mamma’s Room” Group 4 (Blue): Analyze “Girls in Mamma’s Room” & “Breaking Home Ties”; present “Breaking Home Ties”

4 Painting A – “Santa Lucia” by Carl Larsson

5 Painting B – “Freedom from Want”/ “Thanksgiving Dinner” by Norman Rockwell

6 Painting C – “Girls in Mamma’s Room” by Carl Larsson

7 Painting D – “Breaking Home Ties” by Norman Rockwell

8 Focusing questions for each painting: What is the argument of the painting? Evaluate the persuasiveness of the argument. How does the painting convey its argument? Consider perspective, likeness to reality, color, angle, choice of subject, portrayal of subjects, background, style. What can you tell about the audience and artist of this painting? How did you arrive at these conclusions? What is the dominant appeal of the painting? An appeal to emotion (pathos)? To authority (ethos)? To logic and reason (logos)? How does the use of appeals contribute to the effectiveness of the argument? How does an understanding of the kairos of the argument affect its persuasiveness? What cultural assumptions or expectations do you find present in the painting? Could you argue that this painting is culturally specific? How does it work for certain cultural audiences, or not? If you are done early with this activity, feel free to choose another painting of your own to analyze with your group using the additional paintings provided on WebCT. Afterwards. work together as a group to create a brief (5 min), informal presentation about your analysis of one of the paintings: each group will be assigned which painting to present by the instructors. Everyone in the group should have a speaking role; presentation responsibilities (topics, content, order of speakers) should be clearly assigned.


Download ppt "Örebro-Stanford Cross-Cultural Rhetoric Workshop Rhetoric A meets Rhetorics of Art and Commerce Led by Anders Eriksson & John Peterson April 12, 2007 WGLN."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google