Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
T-6B CRM Recurrency Training
2
Training Requirements
CRM History OPNAVINST C Seven (7) Critical Skills A T/M Specific Case Study or Scenario Flight Evaluation
3
Flight Evaluation Conducted by a CRM Instructor (CRM-I) or CRM Facilitator (CRM-F) for the T/M. Flight or simulator Evaluation valid for 12 months from the last day of the month. Renewal flight may be accomplished within 60 days preceding expiration of current evaluation and is good for 12 months from the last day of the month in which the current evaluation expires. Note: Ground training is required once a year is and is only valid for 12 months.
4
VV2E123, cleared to Navy North Whiting as filed, after takeoff fly heading 030, climb and maintain 4,000’, departure frequency button 5, squawk 4321.
5
VV2E123, cleared to Navy North Whiting as filed, after takeoff fly heading 030, climb and maintain 4,000’, departure frequency button 5, squawk 4321.
6
CRM History What is CRM? What is the goal of CRM?
To improve mission effectiveness by minimizing crew preventable errors, maximizing crew coordination, and optimizing risk management. Events leading to CRM development - Tenerife
7
Tenerife Background A runway collision involving two 747s
583 fatal injuries, the most ever in any single aviation related mishap A major accident that segued CRM development
8
Tenerife
9
Safety Response Greater emphasis on English as international language of aviation Establishment of standard phraseology ICAO: “line up and wait.” Requirement for precise read-back instructions (no “OK” or “roger”) Phrase "take-off" is only spoken when the actual take-off clearance is given (e.g. “departure”) Crew Resource Management
10
Naval Aviation Mishap Rate
Program & Technology Introductions & Education Angled decks Aviation Safety Center Naval Aviation Maintenance Program (NAMP), 1959 RAG concept initiated NATOPS Program, 1961 Squadron Safety program System Safety Designated Aircraft HFC’s ACT / CRM MFOQA ORM ASAP
11
Human Error!!! CFIT Midair OCF Maintenance
12
Human Error Today Human Error No. of Class A Mishaps USN/USMC, FY05-09
4/25/2017 USN/USMC, FY05-09 Human Error No. of Class A Mishaps USN Aviation 52 of 61 HE 85% USMC Aviation 32 of 33 HE 97% As you can see, human error is a major contributing factor in all mishaps. There is also a high proportion of human errors in PMV mishaps. Any mishap that is caused by human error can and must be prevented. Updated human error statistics slide. The updated slide indicates that human error declined some in the Navy from 94% to 85%. This is largely due to some of the class "A" mishaps that we have had being caused by mechanical defects, T-34 and E-2C come to mind, though the overall rate still hovers around 90%. Leading Causal Factors Human Error (89%) Aircrew (breakdown in Crew Resource Management, poor decision making, failure to properly perform emergency procedures) Supervisory (failure to provide adequate guidance and training) Material/Systems Malfunction (11%) Material/component catastrophic failure (no human error involved) NSC Data: 05 Oct 2010 NHA Symposium. April 12 12
13
The “Swiss Cheese” Model of Accident Causation (Reason, 1990)
Excessive cost cutting Reduction in flight hours resulting from inability to control cost of spare parts Organizational Factors Deficient training program Improper crew pairing Unsafe Supervision Failures in the System Loss of Situational Awareness Poor CRM Preconditions for Unsafe Acts Failed to Scan Instruments Penetrated IMC when VMC only Unsafe Acts Mishap & Injury Crashed into side of mountain Mishaps are most often the end result of a chain of events, not solely the failure of aircrew.
14
Navy and Marine CRM 1993 – ACT program formed via Tiger Team
1994 – ACT school house 1995 – OPNAVINST A 1998 – OPNAVINST B 2001 – OPNAVINST C 2002 – Fleet integration complete ? - OPNAVINST D Go Over OPNAVINST
15
CRM Situational Awareness Assertiveness Decision Making Communication
Leadership Adaptability/Flexibility Mission Analysis NAVY (NAVAIR) A1-T6BAA-NFM-100 FLIGHT CREW COORDINATION (8-2-1)
16
Situational Awareness
The degree of accuracy by which one’s perception of the current environment mirrors reality. Maintaining a high level of situational awareness will better prepare crews to respond to unexpected situations. What factors can reduce SA?
17
Factors that reduce S/A
Insufficient communication Fatigue/Stress Task overload/underload Group mindset Press on regardless philosophy Degraded operating conditions
18
Assertiveness Willingness to actively participate, state, and maintain a position, until convinced by the facts (not the authority or personality of another) that other options are better. Assertiveness is respectful and professional, and used to resolve problems appropriately. How can you create an assertive statement?
19
Creating an Assertive Statement
Typically use active verbs or recommend an action get the attention of the receiver state your concern offer a solution ask for feedback
20
Decision Making Ability to choose a course of action using logical and sound judgment based on the available information. What factors promote good decision making?
21
Factors which promote good Decision Making
Teamwork Extra time to make decision Alert crew members Decision strategies and experience
22
Communication Ability to clearly and accurately send and acknowledge information, instructions, or commands, and provide useful feedback. Effective communication is vital to ensure that all crewmembers understand aircraft and mission status. How do we attempt to overcome some barriers to communications?
23
Overcoming Barriers Use active listening techniques Require feedback
Use appropriate mode of communication and decibel level Use standard terminology
24
Leadership Ability to direct and coordinate the activities of other crewmembers or wingmen, and to encourage the crew to work together as a team. What are your responsibilities as a leader?
25
Responsibilities of Leaders
Direct and coordinate the crew’s activities Delegate tasks Ensure crew understands what is expected of them Focus attention on crucial aspects of the situation Keep crew informed of mission information Ask crew for mission relevant information Provide feedback to the crew on their performance Create and maintain a professional atmosphere
26
Adaptability/Flexibility
Ability to alter a course of action based on new information to meet situational demands. Maintain constructive behavior under pressure, and adapt to internal and external environmental changes. How do you maintain adaptability?
27
Maintaining Adaptability
Decision not irrevocable - continue to evaluate Anticipate problems Recognize and acknowledge any change Take alternative actions, if necessary Interact constructively with entire crew - provide and ask for assistance - gain crew support for decisions made
28
Mission Analysis Ability to develop short term, long term, and contingency plans, and to coordinate, allocate, and monitor crew and aircraft resources.
29
T/M Specific Case Study
30
Questions?
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.