Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byTobias Stafford Modified over 9 years ago
1
Target group: 40 parents, who took part in the two training courses in the project
2
Sex: □ Male: 10 persons □ Female: 30 persons Area: Urban area: 30 Rural area: 10
3
Age: □ < 35 - 2 persons (2 f) □ 35-40 - 11 persons (3m and 8 f) □ 41-45 - 14 persons (1 m and 13 f) □ 46-50 – 5 persons (2 m and 3 f) □ 51-55 - 7 persons (3 m and 4 f) □ > 56 -1 persons (1 m) f = female m = male
5
Professional school – 9 persons High school – 17 University – 5 Master degree – 8 Ph.D. - 1
6
Teacher – 7 persons Schoolmasters - 8 persons Weaver - 1 person Typographer - 1 person Administrator - 3 persons Auto electrician - 1 person Social assistant - 1 person Cashier - 1 person Nurses - 3 persons Manufacturer - 1 person
7
Storekeeper – 1 person Manager - 1 person Economist – 2 persons Priest - 1 person Constructor - 1 person Physician - 1 person Lecturer - 1 person Secretary - 1 person Caster - 1 person Not specified - 3 persons
8
23 parents / 1 child 8 parents / 2 children 5 parents / 3 children 4 parents / more than 3 children
10
If yes, do you have an Internet connection? □ Yes – 39 persons (10 m and 29 f) □ No – 1 person (f)
11
1- 3 persons 1=very low 2 – 8 persons 2=low 3 – 14 persons 3=medium 4 – 11 persons 4=good 5 – 4 persons 5=very good 29 have medium/good/very good level
12
Seminars – specialized courses 1(9 pers.) 2 (2 pers.) 3 (5 pers.) 4 (5 pers.) 5 (5 pers) Didn’t answer (14 pers.) Personal use of the Internet 1(2 pers.) 2 (5 pers.) 3(15 pers.) 4 (5 pers.) 5 (6 pers.) Didn’t answer (7 pers.) Specialized readings 1(11 pers.) 2(3 pers.) 3 (4 pers.) 4 (3 pers.) 5 (1 pers.) Didn’t answer (18 pers.) From my children 1(7 pers.) 2(6 pers.) 3 (12 pers.) 4 (2 pers.) 5 (1 pers.) Didn’t answer (12 pers.) From friends 1(7 pers.) 2 (8 pers.) 3 (4 pers.) 4 (1 pers.) 5 (1 pers.) Didn’t answer (19 pers) Other sources (mention them) - 33 parents – from the personal use 33 parents – from the personal use 28 parents – from their children
13
Internet search 90,5% Yes (38 persons) No (2 persons) Yes (38 persons) No (2 persons) E-mail use 70,5% Yes(30 persons) No (10 persons) Yes(30 persons) No (10 persons) Music download 60,6% Yes(26 persons) No (14 persons) Yes(26 persons) No (14 persons)
14
1 - 2 persons 2 – 1 persons 3 – 12 persons 4 – 9 persons 5 – 14 persons Didn’t answer – 2 persons Most of them are aware of the risks
15
Access on sites with illegal, immoral, violent, racist content etc.: 5 (34 pers.) 80,5% Spam messages (threat, sexual harassment etc.) 5 (30 pers.) 70,5% Participation in Internet frauds 5 (30 pers.) 70,5 % Unsecured financial transactions 5 (28 pers.) 70,0% Internet addiction 5 (28 pers.) 70,0% Direct communication with unknown persons (in chat rooms, blogs, msn etc.) 5 (28 pers.) 70,0%
17
Age groups 9 years – 4 persons 10 years – 2 persons 11 years – 2 persons 12 years – 5 persons 13 years – 3 persons 14 years – 5 persons 15 years – 3 persons 16 years – 4 persons 17 years – 2 persons 18 years – 5 persons 19 years – 4 persons 21 years – o persons
18
Less than 3 hours per day – 16 persons Over 3 hours per day – 12 persons Once or twice per week – 8 persons Once or twice per month – 1 person Once or twice per year – 0 persons Do not know / Not certain – 1 person Other (please specify) – during free time – 2 persons
20
Throughout comparison of the way parents see the intensity of the Internet use, we must show that they consider the Internet use of their children is more frequent than their own use
21
In respect to the location from which the children access the Internet, the parents show that the great majority of children access the Internet from home: 21 persons indicate level 5 of home access 3 pers. indicate level 4 9 pers. indicate level 3 5 pers. level 2 2 pers. indicate level 1
22
Time of day In the morning Yes (2 pers.) No (17 pers.) Do not know / Not sure (21pers.) Noon Yes (3 pers.) No (14 pers.) Do not know / Not sure (23 pers.) In the afternoon Yes (28 pers.) No (2 pers.) Do not know / Not sure (10 pers.) In the evening Yes (26 pers.) No (4 pers.) Do not know / Not sure (10pers.) After midnight Yes (0 pers.) No (16 pers.) Do not know / Not sure (24pers.) The great majority of children access the Internet in the afternoon and in the evening.
23
□ in his/ her room – 21 persons □ in parent’s room – 7 persons □ in common rooms (ex. living room) – 12 persons The great majority of children placed the computer in their own room That is why some of the parents cannot be around their children when they use the Internet
24
20 persons state that they can be around their children when using the Internet. 15 persons state that they cannot be around their children when using the Internet. □ Didn’t answer - 5 persons
25
Access of sites with illegal, immoral, violent, racist content etc. 5(36 pers.) 5(36 pers.)90,0%
26
Direct communication with unknown persons (in chat rooms, blog, msn etc.) 5(35 pers.) 80,7% Participation in Internet frauds 5(35 pers.) 80,7% Unsecured financial transactions 5(31 pers.) 70,7% Danger for health 5(31 pers 70,7% Spam messages (threats, sexual harassment etc.) 5(31 pers.) 70,7%
27
28 persons state that the children have never been in any danger during the Internet use 12 persons state that they have been notified by their children about this kind of dangers □ Yes – 12 persons □ No – 28 persons
28
Communication with unknown persons – 3 persons Personal data theft trial – 3 persons You access a site and you find porn – 3 persons Violent sites– 1 person Viruses messages – 2 persons Games addiction – 1 person
29
Installation of antivirus programs 5(30 pers.) Parents’ surveillance in the case when children access chat rooms, bloggs, msn etc. 5(32 pers.) Regular verification of the computer by parents in order to identify the documents with suspect content 5(31 pers.) Installation of some software and e-mail filters (by parents) 5(31 pers.) 5(31 pers.) Internet activity reports provided by certain services (ex. MSN Premium) 5(29 pers.) Children’s information in school about the dangers of Internet 5(35 pers.) Interdiction for children to access the Internet 5(22 pers.) Other methods (please specify): Making children aware of the right use of computers 1(2 pers.)
30
Child education – 1 person Selection of option together with the parents - 1 person Internet access only in the afternoon - 1 person Discussions on the dangers with the child – 2 persons Limitation of children’s access time – 7 persons Personal example of parents – 1 person Introduction of computer password – 1 person Introduction of filters/firewalls for illegal and immoral sites – 3 persons Surveillance/ monitoring/ verification of child’s activities – 15 persons Permanent communication with the child – 18 persons Making children aware of the risks – 3 persons Restrictions in accessing some Internet sites – 1 person Do not know - 2 persons Didn’t take any measure - 4 persons I trust my child - 1 person
31
1 - 1 person 2 - 4 persons 3 - 10 persons 4 - 13 persons 5 - 12 persons 35 parents considered that they have a medium/good/very good level of children protection
32
The data obtained from this study lead to the conclusion that the publication of a guide is necessary; the guide will facilitate the understanding of each child’s personality, in order to avoid any kind of danger which could show up in the children’s lives. This study was achieved by prof. Maricica Buzescu prof. Ileana Savinescu
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.