1. 1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Experimental Facilities John Hill EFAC review October 19 th, 2006

2. 2 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Contributors to XFD Portion of CDR James Ablett Marc Allaire Dieter Schneider Wuxian Shi Vivian Stojanoff Robert Sweet Mark Chance Mike Dudley Paul Northrup Peter Stephens Joe Woicik Sushil Sharma Steve Hulbert Toshi Tanabe Sam Krinsky George Rakowsky Anatoly Snigirev* Jorg Maser* Ken Evans-Lutterodt Deming Shu Alfred Baron* Yuri Shvyd’ko* Clement Burns Alec Sandy* Simon Mochrie* Ian Robinson* Dario Arena Cecilia Sanchez-Hanke Lonny Berman Peter Takacs Peter Siddons Christie Nelson Zhong Harald Reichart Chris Jacobsen* Chris Homes Wayne Betts Barrett Clay Bob Delasio Tony Kuczewski Jeff Landgraf Jerome Lauret Dennis Poshka Ivan So Zhijian Yin Roger Dejus Nick Simos Elaine DiMasi Mohan Ramanathan* Thomas Gog* Larry Carr Lisa Miller Elio Vescovo Peter Johnson Lin Yang Qun Shen PK Job Qiong Wu Paul Dumas Scott Coburn Ruben Reininger* Natasha Bozovic Ivan Bozovic Paul O’Connor Sal Pjerov Oliver Hignette* Marc Tricard* Christian Schroer* * NSLS-II Visitor

3. 3 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Design Specifications Ultra-high brightness -Drives emittance, energy spread, stability. High flux -Drives current, top-up, length of straight sections. Wide spectral range: 0.1 meV to 100 keV -Drives user devices (BM, undulators, SCW), storage ring energy. Experimental View:

4. 4 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Importance of Electron Emittance Fraction of flux into focused spot = So, as  el 0,  tot Horizontal emittance Vertical emittance =1A Where and..and fraction of flux delivered in spot 1

5. 5 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Effect of Energy Spread

6. 6 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Effect of Insertion Device Length E=8.33 keV, 5 th harmonic of U19

7. 7 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Effect of  BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES =L/2=L/2 Maximum brightness L=3m  =0.5 nm To a zeroth approximation, users want the most photons in the smallest spot, with the smallest divergence: Brightness For L=3m then optimum  =0.5m

8. 8 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Current Parameters SizeDivergenceSizeDivergenceSizeDivergence Vert.5.9  m12  rad5.9  m12  rad6.3  m11.9  rad Horiz.14  m44  rad39  m18.6  rad100  m13  rad  x =18.1m,  y =3.1m 8m  x =2.7m,  y =0.95m 5m Angular acceptance of C(111)  vertical Has minimal impact on photon beam.  horiz Allows some tuning of photon divergence and beam size Photon Beam 1 st harmonic, 3m U19 5m*  x =0.3 m,  y =0.95m * Possible low-beta option

9. 9 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Insertion Devices

10. 10 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Brightness Curves

11. 11 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Flux Curves

12. 12 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES IR from Bending Magnets Extraction of IR from BM appears feasible with good performance down to 1 cm -1 Currently looking into impact on accelerator and cost.

13. 13 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Far-IR performance NSLS-II std gap dipoles NSLS-II large gap dipoles (60 mm) NSLS-II v. large gap dipoles (90 mm)

14. 14 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Beamlines BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES For the purposes of obtaining a detailed cost estimate and to explore the technical issues for state-of-the-art beamlines at NSLS-II, Five insertion device beamlines were explored in some detail: 1)Inelastic X-ray Scattering (Hill, Shvyd’ko and Baron) 2)Hard X-ray Nanoprobe (Gog, Evans-Lutterodt) 3)Hard X-ray Coherent Scattering (Sandy, Mochrie, Robinson) 4)Soft x-ray Imaging and Coherent scattering (Sanchez-Hanke, Hulbert, Reinginer) 5)Soft x-ray resonant scattering and inelastic scattering (Arena, Hulbert, Reinginer)

15. 15 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Beamlines Superconducting Magnet NSLS II Experimental floor In addition, we have considered a number of other beamlines at a less detailed level: High magnetic field (Nelson) High Energy (Zhong) SAXS (Yang) IR (Carr) Imaging (Shen) Damping Wigglers (Berman) PX (Berman) ARPES (Johnson/Vescovo) Bending Magnet (Berman/Arena)

16. 16 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Beamline Development Beamline Access Teams (BATs) Facility receives funding to design, construct, and operate beamlines. Beamline Development Teams (BDTs) User group receives funding to design, construct, and operate beamline. Two principal modes : User groups would form and work with the facility to define the scientific mission and technical requirements for the beamline

17. 17 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Usage of Facility Type IDsBMsTotalIDsBMsTotal A IR/UV/soft x-ray spectroscopy111123710 B X-ray spectroscopy639099 C soft-matter/biophysics scattering404088 D hard matter/strongly correlated9110358 E powder/single Xtal/high-P/optics73103811 F Imaging/micro-probe459279 G Macromolecular crystallography7072810 Totals382361135265 NSLSNSLS-II A strawman beamline distribution was constructed for one possible scenario for a mature facility : Note: This process took into account the expected demand, the existing community and the enhanced NSLS-II capabilities. In this scenario a few IDs and a few BMs remain open.

18. 18 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Canting ConfigurationCanting angle (half)  x Bare - 2.04 nm 5 x 7m00.55 nm 5 x (3.5m + 3.5m)1.5 mrad0.71 nm 5 x (3.5m + 3.5m)2.5 mrad0.80 nm 5 x (2.33m+2.33m+2.33m)1 mrad0.57 nm 5 x (2.33m+2.33m+2.33m)3 mrad0.80 nm 8 x 7m00.48 nm 8 x (3.5m +3.5m)1.5 mrad0.54 nm 35m DW +1 x(1m +1m)1 mrad0.54 nm The effects of canting have been studied as far as the impact on dispersion and hence emittance (Bengtsson): Wigglers Undulators Device

19. 19 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES R+D Overview Four areas of proposed focus: 1) 1nm Spatial Resolution - Multi-layer Laue approach - Kinoform approach 2) 0.1 meV Energy Resolution - Asymmetric optics 3) Reflective Optics Metrology - Optical metrology - At wavelength testing 4) Detectors –Large area pixelated detectors –Integrated electronics

20. 20 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Tentative Process & Schedule 200720082009201120102012201320142015 1 st beamBO Ring bldg Construction Commiss- ioning LOI: Select BATs TDR Project BATs Initial BDTs Possible MIEs CDRTDR LOI: Select BDTs Full proposal CDRTDR Construction Commiss- ioning Possible MIEs ?

21. 21 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Remainder of the Talks Today Conventional Facilities- Marty Fallier Beamline Development – Hill Tomorrow Beamlines Hard x-ray undulator beamlines – Hill Soft x-ray undulator beamlines – Steve Hulbert Damping Wiggler and BM beamlines – Lonny Berman IR beamlines – Larry Carr Cost Estimate/Trust Fund - Hill R+D 1nm – Evans-Lutterodt 0.1 meV – Yuri Shvyd’ko Detectors – Paul O’Connor Insertion Devices – Toshi Tanabe Metrology – Peter Takacs

22. 22 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Summary XFD portion of CDR is nearing completion. User requirements generated by this have driven accelerator and conventional facilities design. Conceptual designs have been carried out for a number of beamlines to inform a detailed cost estimate, and a number of others at a pre- conceptual level. Some beamlines will be built as part of the construction project utilizing a trust fund approach. These will begin commissioning in 2013. Remaining beamlines will be built with other funds (e.g. will pursue potential MIEs and other non-BES funds) and brought online in the following years. Items requiring R+D have been identified and a plan outlined. User Access modes and facility build-out issues have begun to be addressed.