2. I ndia-Support for Teacher Education Program 2013 Presenter: Rajni Jha State/Group: Madhya Pradesh Title: Improve Pedagogy in Mathematics

3. INTRODUCTION The training program was focused on mainly these areas:- 1.Academic support 2. USA schools visits 3.Cultural visits

4. ACADEMIC SUPPORT  Reflection on NCF- 2005,NCFTE-2009  Research on “Good teacher” by Prof. C.M. Clark  Gender Equity and Inclusion  Classroom instruction by B J Stone  Evaluation methods of NIET- USA  Hippocratic Oath  Seminar on early childhood  Democracy  Leadership  Behavioral managements, writing skills, sustainability, science teaching, poverty etc.  Technology classes with all new skills and technical support  Library support with books and online e-books.

5. USA Schools Visits  Power Ranch elementary school (highly high school)  Adam elementary school (mesa high school)  Photini’s class at ASU campus  Pre school at ASU campus  William C. J. elementary school(Glendale high school)  Smart board class training

6. Cultural visits  Welcome by Indo -American society  Navratri Festival  Canyon Lake  Gold town visit  Sonora dessert Museum visit  Kartchner Caverns Caves  Tucson excursion  Grand canyon visit

7. Pumpkins Festival Celebration

8. Washington D.C. Visit

9. Core Group of Madhya Pradesh  We are 5 members from Madhya Pradesh:-  Mr. Atul danayak  Mr.B.B.gupta  Mrs. Ranjeeta Joshi  Km. Anjum Ara  Mrs. Rajni Jha

10. Topics Of Reform Proposal  Our topics of reform proposals are as follows:-  Atul Danayak- Try outs of new concepts of proposed D.Ed. Curriculum  B.B.P.Gupta- Improvement Mathematics teaching practices through Support at elementary Level  Ranjeeta Joshi- Internship as a partnership model  Anjum Ara- Strengthening of classroom practice teaching in Science Methodology of student teacher  Rajni Jha-Improve Pedagogy in Mathematics

11. My Reform Proposal Topic  Improve Pedagogy in Mathematics

12. Rationale  N.C.E.R.T., New Delhi conducted Base line in 2001-02  Mid-term Achievement Surveys in 2005-06 and  Terminal Achievement Survey in 2009-10.  The abilities Madhya Pradesh students found difficult in Mathematics are as follows: S.No. Ability% correct in MP 1 To identify number of triangles in a figure 27 2 To calculate perimeter of squares & information about area 36

13. Action Plan IMPLEMENTATIONEVALUATION What needs to be done? By whom and when? What resources? What evidence indicates progress? How and when will evidence be gathered? 1.Meeing with Principal Myself, January 1/1/2014 No resource required Principal will know about the plan N.A. 2.Core group formation Principal, January 2/1/2014 DIET faculty- Principal O. P. Dixit Meeting Agenda N.A.

14. Continued….. 3.Core group orientation Myself,January 3/1/2014 Laptop, Projector, Reform project, notebook, pen, chart, marker Core group will be able to improve their professional development N.A. 4.School Observation Teacher opinion (Questionnair e) Pre Test Core group 4/1/2013 6/1/2013 Questionnaire Pre test Analysis of questionnaire & Pre test Analysis of Questionnaire and Pre-test On 6/1/2014

15. Continued……. 5. Mathematics pool formation Myself and core group, January 07/01/2014 Head masters and 2 teachers of Thatipur Gaon PS Mahalgaon PS 2 trainees Mathematics pool formedN.A. 6..Mathematics pool orientation 08/01/2014Laptop, projector, notebook Orientation of Mathematics Pool N.A.

16. Continued….. 7.Teaching Learning Material development workshop Myself and core group, January 13/01/2014 to 17/01/2014 Notebook, flowchart pen, chart, pencil, marker, scissor, etc. Teaching Learning Material T.L.M. are ready to use 8.Teaching Learning Material testing at DIET Level(Micro teaching) Myself and core group 20/01/2014 Teaching Learning Material stationery Primary teachers will know the proper use of T.L.M. T.L.M. are ready to use

17. Continued…. 9.Try out of Teaching learning material in selected 2 primary schools Selected school’s Math teachers, Jan 21/01/2014 Teaching Learning Material Student’s feedback With the help of assessment tool in Jan 2014 10.Day by day feed back Myself and core group Teachers, Student teachers, school students Exercise analysis Feedback checklist

18. Continued…. 11.Improveme nt in Teaching Learning Material Myself and core group 21/01/2014 to March 2014 Teaching Learning Material According to feedback observation Feedback Checklist 12. Questionnaire + Post test Myself, core group February 2014, March 2014. Assessment tools and Post test Feedback of assessment tools & post test With the help of assessment tool in Feb & March 2014

19. Continued…… 13.Analysis of data Myself and core group, April 2014. Assessment tools and Post test Assessment tools, observation and post test With the help of assessment tool in July 2014 14.Reports & Recommendat ions Core Group May 2014 Analysis of Data and Documentation Sending DataMay 2014 15. Future strategies / planning long term objectives Myself, core group, resource pool and other primary schools Math teachers. Long term planAcademic Performance of students N.A.

20. Potential Benefits  pedagogy in Mathematics at primary level as per proposed curriculum of D.Ed. will be easier.  It will help the teachers to understand pedagogy of Mathematics.  Teachers will improve their professional development and professional competencies.  It will helpful for students in future.

21. Final Evaluation Outcomes  April 2014  Based on Tap Rubric outcomes.  On the basis of written assessment test  Observation of classrooms practices  All datas will be documented, analyse and will use for future strategies.

22. Long term planning  A meeting will be conduct on May, 2014 in DIET.  In this meeting core group members, pool members, and selected 2 school’s teachers will participate.  During this meeting an implementation plan will be developed to achieve long term objectives.

23. Thank You