1. The Customers Perspective of Port Authorities IAPH Seminar, March 2005 1 Capt. Howard N. Snaith (Master Mariner M.N.I.) Director Marine, Chemical, Ports, Terminals, Environmental INTERTANKO

2. The Customers Perspective of Port Authorities IAPH Seminar, March 2005 2 The International Association of Independent Tanker Owners INTERTANKO Safe Transport Cleaner Seas Free Competition

3. The Customers Perspective of Port Authorities IAPH Seminar, March 2005 3 The International Association of Independent Tanker Owners INTERTANKO 230 Members230 Members 2,030 tankers 157 million dwt Average age: 11.8 years 72 % of the Worlds Independent Tanker Fleet 81% of the Worlds Chemical Fleet 290 Associate Members290 Associate Members 23 Staff / 8 Consultants23 Staff / 8 Consultants Joint Secretariat with INTERCARGOJoint Secretariat with INTERCARGO Oslo London Washington Singapore

4. The Customers Perspective of Port Authorities IAPH Seminar, March 2005 4 1.Under Keel Clearance 2.Communications 3.Port Congestion 4.Security 5.Reception Facilities 6.Pilotage 7.Terminal Safety 8.Port Tariffs 9.Chain of Responsibility

5. The Customers Perspective of Port Authorities IAPH Seminar, March 2005 5 1.Under Keel Clearance Our members still report that some ports/terminals have less water than reported and shown on the charts or advised to the local Pilot. Ship owners comply with strict Under Keel Clearance policies, but these policies are based upon the known water depth. The next generation of Very Large Ore Carriers are under construction for restricted routes but will entail deeper ports. Its imperative that charted water depths are as up to date as possible to ensure the environment remains protected

6. The Customers Perspective of Port Authorities IAPH Seminar, March 2005 6 2. Communications Waste reception - International standardisation of Advance Notification form (ANF). Increased use and harmonisation of ANF within the shipping community will greatly facilitate communication between ship/shore & streamline procedures for alerting waste reception companies of the ships requirements.

7. The Customers Perspective of Port Authorities IAPH Seminar, March 2005 7 2. Communications Port waste management Plans - Increased availability of port waste management plans. Dissemination of these details and cost structure needs to be made available direct to the ship operators, for ease of comparison and arrangements in advance of arrival.

8. The Customers Perspective of Port Authorities IAPH Seminar, March 2005 8 2.Communications BLU code The development of and wider promulgation of the BLU (Bulk Loading & Unloading Code) is appreciated by the dry bulk sector, but more work is required. The ships need the terminals to agree before hand how the ship will be handled in port, mechanisms in place for in port communications, phone links, designated contact staff, training for terminal staff is important, INTERCARGO is addressing this aspect via IMO (Dry Bulk Terminals Working Group), but assistance in facilitating this is requested from the Port Authorities.

9. The Customers Perspective of Port Authorities IAPH Seminar, March 2005 9 2.Communications Communication between the Master & the Pilot. We still receive many reports within European waters that pilots are not communicating in a common language understood by the bridge team. Master Pilot exchange of information pertaining to the pilotage not undertaken in advance.

10. The Customers Perspective of Port Authorities IAPH Seminar, March 2005 10 3. Port Congestion Our sister association (INTERCARGO) advises that one Australian port currently has 40 bulk carriers backed up waiting to load. Problems with port congestion in general are related to sporadic inland infrastructure, railways, road transport that are inadequate for the customers need, investment and long term plans required.

11. The Customers Perspective of Port Authorities IAPH Seminar, March 2005 11 4.Security The implementation of the ISPS & MTSA code was relatively painless, however we are now seeing more and more difficulties associated with security related issues as time goes by. Conflicts with SOLAS – Lifeboat testing not allowed under security measures in place. Ship operational delays – officers not allowed ashore to read the ships draft.currently addressed via MSC Circ. 1132

12. The Customers Perspective of Port Authorities IAPH Seminar, March 2005 12 4.Security Environmental protestors still appear to be able to gain port access with relative ease. Stowaways still persist. Crew members not allowed shore leave Spares/stores not allowed onboard the vessels

13. The Customers Perspective of Port Authorities IAPH Seminar, March 2005 13 5. Reception Facilities “Transportation by ship is vital for the integral business function and supply chain redistribution network of a refinery, ship generated waste needs to be included as an integral component of the waste management stream and business function of the refinery”. “Independent waste disposal businesses often operate without being part of the refining business. The inflated cost penalizes the ship and encourages ships to dump their waste. In some cases refinery terminals have further profited from disposal of ships generated waste by significant charges for receipt of waste from the independent waste disposal businesses”. (Transport Canada 2002)

14. The Customers Perspective of Port Authorities IAPH Seminar, March 2005 14 Adequacy MARPOL - “the reception facilities shall be capable of receiving the types and quantities of ship-generated waste and cargo residues from ships normally using the port” States must meet their obligations, but ship operators, ports and terminals must assist… 5. Reception Facilities Availability MARPOL - “Member States shall ensure the availability of port reception facilities adequate to meet the needs of ships normally using the port without causing undue delay to ships” States must meet their obligations!

15. The Customers Perspective of Port Authorities IAPH Seminar, March 2005 15 5. Reception Facilities Harmonization Waste Segregation Variations (Garbage) Standard segregation of waste Standard labelling and terminology requirements Fee system structure Standardised system of cost mechanism Compulsory Discharge Standardise the current variation in compulsory discharge application, when such a system is applied.

16. The Customers Perspective of Port Authorities IAPH Seminar, March 2005 16 5. Reception Facilities MEPC 52/9 – Industry submission to IMO (October 2004) The Chairman stressed that the issue of the provision of adequate port reception facilities is of paramount importance for the successful implementation of the MARPOL Convention. Having considered document MEPC 52/9 and the comments made in plenary, the Committee: Strongly encouraged Member States, particularly those Parties to the MARPOL Convention as port States, to fulfil their treaty obligations in providing adequate reception facilities. INTERTANKO is working closely with its industry colleagues including IAPH on this important issue.

17. The Customers Perspective of Port Authorities IAPH Seminar, March 2005 17 6. Pilotage Liability; The Master takes the Pilots advise in good faith regarding local knowledge, but if the advice is poor advice the owner pays the bill and the Master takes the blame. Is this right? ……………… What’s the answer? ……….. Closer cooperation between Owners/Pilots? Establishment of a “User Group” ? Confidential feedback systems? Other………?

18. The Customers Perspective of Port Authorities IAPH Seminar, March 2005 18 7. Terminal Safety INTERTANKO Terminal Vetting Database The ship/shore interface takes place at the terminal – this is a critical stage of the load/discharge operation, safety is paramount. We continue to build our Terminal Vetting Database system where our members report on terminals visited. Feedback is excellent. Terminals respond well to the approach for improvements Safety is being enhanced

19. The Customers Perspective of Port Authorities IAPH Seminar, March 2005 19 8. Port Tariffs Simplification and harmonisation of Port tariffs.. We appreciate the need for a commercial world and to ensure ports are maintained to a high standard but… At one port in Europe owners pay USD 1.81 per GT if the quantity of Crude or Crude Product discharged is equal to or more than 172.9% of the GT, and a USD 0.81 if it is less) Why ?...

20. The Customers Perspective of Port Authorities IAPH Seminar, March 2005 20 The Safety Chain: We all Play a Part SHIPOWNER SHIPYARDS INSURERS BANKS & INVESTORS CARGO OWNER CHARTERER PORTS & TERMINALS CLASS SOCIETIES FLAG STATES PORT STATES

21. The Customers Perspective of Port Authorities IAPH Seminar, March 2005 21 INTERTANKO is always open to dialogue, exploring areas of mutual cooperation and willing to work together with, Regulators, Politicians, Flag States, Classification Societies, Port State Control, and all its industry partners in order to promote the tanker industry, enhance safety and protect the environment. Thank You for Your Time