Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byIsabella Rogers Modified over 9 years ago
1
A multilevel path analysis of social networks and social interaction in the neighbourhood Pauline van den Berg Harry Timmermans
2
Introduction Neighbourhood-based social contacts Social network literature: declining role of neighbourhoods Urban planning literature: increasing attention (urban renewal policies) Empirical findings are scarce and inconclusive
3
Introduction Neighbourhood-based social contacts Socio-demographic characteristics Neighbourhood characteristics
4
Structure Data collection Descriptives Path analysis results
5
Data collection Quality of life questionnaire May 2011 In 70 neighbourhoods in Eindhoven
6
Personal approach 751 completed questionnaires
7
Sample MeanSt. dev. Age 47.1116.86 Full time work: >36 hours (dummy) 0.230.42 No work (dummy) 0.420.49 Low income: < € 1000,- per month after tax (dummy) 0.110.32 High income > € 3000,- per month after tax (dummy) 0.290.46 Low education: primary (dummy) 0.400.49 High education: BSc or higher (dummy) 0.070.26 Child(ren) under 18 in household (dummy) 0.380.49 Club memberships (nr) 0.961.20 Western immigrant (dummy) 0.040.19 Non-western immigrant (dummy) 0.060.24 Years in current address 13.9012.81 Mean household income in neighbourhood (x €1000) 23.915.66 % non-western immigrants in neighbourhood 16.349.02 Urban: >2500 addresses per km 2 (dummy) 0.390.49
8
Network size and share of neighbours Think about the people you feel very close to: - discuss important matters, - regularly keep in touch with, - are there if you need help somewhat close to: - more than just casual acquaintances Network sizemean 24.85st. dev. 25.68 Share of neighboursmean 10.14st. dev. 13.50 # direct relatives …………# other relatives ……….. # colleagues ……………..# club members ……….. # neighbours ………………# other friends ………….
9
Interaction with neighbours Frequency of interaction N % Never (0) 49 6.5 Once a month or less (1) 112 14.9 2 or 3 times per month (2.5) 89 11.9 Once a week (4) 130 17.3 Several times per week (12) 237 31.6 (almost) every day (24) 133 17.7
10
Methods Path analysis −Can capture the relationships between several dependent and independent variables −Special case of structural equation modeling (SEM) −Deals only with measured variables
11
Methods Path analysis −Can capture the relationships between several dependent and independent variables −Special case of structural equation modeling (SEM) −Deals only with measured variables Multilevel path analysis −Captures hierarchical structure of the data
12
Model structure % neighbours in network Age Work Income Children Club memberships Education Non-western immigrant Western immigrant Years in address Neighbourhood income % Non-west. immigrants Urban Social network size Interaction frequency
13
Results single-level model % neighbours in network Age Work Income Children Club memberships Education Non-western immigrant Western immigrant Years in address Neighbourhood income % Non-west. immigrants Urban Social network size Interaction frequency
14
Results single-level model % neighbours in network Age Work Income Children Club memberships Education Non-western immigrant Western immigrant Years in address Neighbourhood income % Non-west. immigrants Urban Social network size Interaction frequency
15
Results single-level model % neighbours in network Age Work Income Children Club memberships Education Non-western immigrant Western immigrant Years in address Neighbourhood income % Non-west. immigrants Urban Social network size Interaction frequency
16
Results single-level model % neighbours in network Age Work Income Children Club memberships Education Non-western immigrant Western immigrant Years in address Neighbourhood income % Non-west. immigrants Urban Social network size Interaction frequency
17
Results single-level model % neighbours in network Age Work Income Children Club memberships Education Non-western immigrant Western immigrant Years in address Neighbourhood income % Non-west. immigrants Urban Social network size Interaction frequency
18
Results single-level model % neighbours in network Age Work Income Children Club memberships Education Non-western immigrant Western immigrant Years in address Neighbourhood income % Non-west. immigrants Urban Social network size Interaction frequency
19
Results single-level model % neighbours in network Age Work Income Children Club memberships Education Non-western immigrant Western immigrant Years in address Neighbourhood income % Non-west. immigrants Urban Social network size Interaction frequency
20
Results single-level model % neighbours in network Age Work Income Children Club memberships Education Non-western immigrant Western immigrant Years in address Neighbourhood income % Non-west. immigrants Urban Social network size Interaction frequency
21
Results single-level model % neighbours in network Age Work Income Children Club memberships Education Non-western immigrant Western immigrant Years in address Neighbourhood income % Non-west. immigrants Urban Social network size Interaction frequency
22
Results single-level model % neighbours in network Age Work Income Children Club memberships Education Non-western immigrant Western immigrant Years in address Neighbourhood income % Non-west. immigrants Urban Social network size Interaction frequency
23
Results single-level model % neighbours in network Age Work Income Children Club memberships Education Non-western immigrant Western immigrant Years in address Neighbourhood income % Non-west. immigrants Urban Social network size Interaction frequency
24
Results single-level model % neighbours in network Age Work Income Children Club memberships Education Non-western immigrant Western immigrant Years in address Neighbourhood income % Non-west. immigrants Urban Social network size Interaction frequency
25
Results multi-level model % neighbours in network Age Work Income Children Club memberships Education Non-western immigrant Western immigrant Years in address Neighbourhood income % Non-west. immigrants Urban Social network size Interaction frequency
26
Conclusions Socio-demographics are more important than neighbourhood characteristics in explaining contacts with neighbours
27
Conclusions Socio-demographics are more important than neighbourhood characteristics in explaining contacts with neighbours Contacts with neighbours higher for people with longer residence and more time at home
28
Conclusions Socio-demographics are more important than neighbourhood characteristics in explaining contacts with neighbours Contacts with neighbours higher for people with longer residence and more time at home Limited effects of neighbourhood characteristics
29
Conclusions Socio-demographics are more important than neighbourhood characteristics in explaining contacts with neighbours Contacts with neighbours higher for people with longer residence and more time at home Limited effects of neighbourhood characteristics Difference between single and multi-level model
30
A multilevel path analysis of social networks and social interaction in the neighbourhood Pauline van den Berg Harry Timmermans
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.