Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Assessing alternative energy sources to fossil fuels NS4053 Week 6.2.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Assessing alternative energy sources to fossil fuels NS4053 Week 6.2."— Presentation transcript:

1 Assessing alternative energy sources to fossil fuels NS4053 Week 6.2

2 Agenda Review forecasts for alternatives to fossil fuel energy Discuss renewable energy alternatives. Considering the other alternative (nuclear). Implications of technology development patterns for future energy return on investment. Consequences

3 US EIA Outlook 2012

4

5

6

7 Renewable alternatives Solar, wind, hydro, tidal, geothermal, etc. – Generally focus is on non-combustible sources. Pros: – Low emissions (in operation) – Renewable – Cost competitive in high energy cost scenario – Domestic/regional sources Cons: – Site sensitive/limited. – Time and weather sensitive/limited. – Life cycle analysis incorporating cost of manufacturing not as favorable. – Large foot print (NIMBY).

8 Up front costs for alternatives

9 LCOE for alternatives

10 Nuclear Regulatory environment Economics Waste Safety Proliferation issues

11

12

13 Nuclear industry demands subsidies to reduce risk and finance construction. Other energy producers lobby against special treatment for nuclear

14

15 What to do about aspiring nuclear states?

16 Implications for global governance Consequences of nuclear accident or proliferation are transnational. Main transnational nuclear issues areas: – Safety – Security – Nonproliferation Existing safety regimes have gaps: – Participation – Enforcement Role of IAEA: vital but frequently hamstrung

17 Nonproliferation Nonproliferation treaty and additional protocols (AP) – Periodic controversy between nuclear and non- nuclear states over disarmament. – Inspection regime has issues, controversy over additional protocols to NPT. – Concerns over vulnerability of fuel cycle to proliferation. Is answer multilateralization of fuel cycle?

18 Patterns in technology development Logic of s-curves: – Initial development: high costs and low efficiency hold down ROI. – Mid-curve: learning, experience, wide adoption, economies of scale bring down costs and increase returns. – Maturing technology: development plateaus, commoditization of product. Governments frequently lobbied for subsidies to push past the beginning of the s-curve. Which energy technologies are at what point in the s- curve?

19

20

21 Case: PV technology S-curve

22 Case: Biofuels s-curve

23 Implications Alternatives do not offer a ‘seamless’ alternative to fossil fuel economy. – Long lead time in terms of investment, experimentation and technology maturity. – Difficulty matching energy produced from fossil fuels. Alternatives do have advantages in easing transition to lower carbon future and higher cost of fossil fuels. Security implications? Alternatives accentuate shift towards domestic/regional energy markets. – Energy would be less of a global security problem.

24 Back up slides

25


Download ppt "Assessing alternative energy sources to fossil fuels NS4053 Week 6.2."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google