Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLawrence Berry Modified over 9 years ago
1
2009 NPS 319 Project Review Arkansas Forestry Commission U of A Cooperative Extension Service September 16-17, 2009
2
Arkansas Forestry Commission Project # 08-700 Arkansas Silvicultural NPS Project Arkansas Forestry Commission Project # 08-700 Arkansas Silvicultural NPS Project Major Tasks AFC Silviculture BMP Assessment Technical BMP Assistance & Training Non Technical BMP Education Courtesy Exams Logger/Forestry Conference AFC BMP Guideline Books and Materials
3
BMP Implementation Assessments Statewide BMP Implementation Averages 2010 - 2011: Next Monitor Historical Averages –2007-2008: 86% –2005-2006: 88% –2002-2003: 88% –2000-2001: 83% –1998-1999: 80% –1996-1997: 85%
4
AFC Districts
5
Aerial Assessment of Sites
8
2007-2008 BMP Assessment Total Logging Operations = 3,339 Total Sites Assessed = 274 8.21% of True Population
9
2007-2008 BMP Assessment Federal = 11 Industry = 138 PNIFLO = 123 State = 2 Total Sites Assessed = 274
10
2007-2008 BMP Assessment Ownership Class No. of SitesImplementation Percent Margin of Error Statistical Difference* PNIFLO 12381.422.64 c Industry 13889.241.82 b Federal 1199.101.32 a State 292.727.66 ab * Implementation percents having a different significance letter are significantly different at the 5 percent probability level. Ownership BMP Implementation Averages
11
2007-2008 BMP Assessment Major BMP Category No. of SitesImplementation Percent Margin of Error Statistical Difference* Roads 17281.652.89 c Harvesting 27492.461.36 a Regeneration 9587.124.86 b Streamside Management Zones 17980.433.72 c Overall Implementation 27486.151.60 * Implementation percents having a different significance letter are significantly different at the 5 percent probability level. Statewide and Categorical BMP Implementation Averages
12
2007-2008 BMP Assessment AFC District BMP Implementation Averages District Number of Tracts Acres Implementation Percent Margin of Error Statistical Difference* District 1 574,56290.732.60 a District 2 293,06287.754.66 a District 3 181,89287.905.52 a District 4 484,27579.874.89 bc District 5 433,18087.293.74 a District 6 201,21390.554.37 a District 7 221,54587.694.99 a District 8 132,68386.594.60 ab District 9 241,85477.235.94 c * Implementation percents having a different significance letter are significantly different at the 5 percent probability level.
13
District 9 Industry by BMP Category BMP Category Number of Tracts Acres Implementation Percent Margin of Error Statistical Significance Roads 121,42183.366.04 a Harvesting 131,50190.646.83 a Regeneration 998295.568.89 a SMZ 882278.2124.51 a District 9 PNIFLO by BMP Category BMP Category Number of Tracts Acres Implementation Percent Margin of Error Statistical Significance Roads 517564.8918.74 ab Harvesting 1135378.7012.70 a Regeneration 1350-- c SMZ 926942.4320.37 bc 2007-2008 BMP Assessment
14
Arkansas Forestry Commission Education and Training Technical BMP Training – Forester, Timber Buyer, and Logger ATPA Logger Training
15
Arkansas Forestry Commission Education and Training Non-Technical Landowner Education
16
Arkansas Forestry Commission Logger/Landowner Forestry Expo
17
Arkansas Forestry Commission Education and Training Courtesy Exams
18
Obstacles Encountered Courtesy Exams Public Perception Public Perception Economic Recession Economic Recession Weather Weather
19
Acknowledgements Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6 Arkansas Natural Resource Commission Arkansas Forestry Association Arkansas Timber Producers Association School of Forest Resources
20
Arkansas Forestry Commission Questions?www.arkansasforestry.org Arnold Hameister Adam Eades AFC BMP Coordinator AFC BMP Specialist
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.