Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byRosamond Grant Modified over 9 years ago
1
Extension and Outreach/Department of Economics Possible Changes to the Renewable Fuels Standard Iowa Farm Bureau Federation Policy Information Conference West Des Moines, Iowa Feb. 21, 2012 Chad Hart Assistant Professor/Grain Markets Specialist chart@iastate.edu 515-294-9911
2
Extension and Outreach/Department of Economics Disclaimer The views expressed in this presentation are strictly the views of Chad Hart
3
Extension and Outreach/Department of Economics H.R. 3097, Renewable Fuel Standard Flexibility Act Tie conventional biofuel standard to the corn stocks- to-use ratio Estimate ratios on Aug. 1 and Nov. 30 Stocks-to-use RatioReduction in Conventional RFS Above 10%No adjustment 7.5 to 10%10% 6 to 7.49%15% 5 to 5.99%25% Below 5%50%
4
Extension and Outreach/Department of Economics H.R. 3097 Timing Two years of possible impacts August value will affect conventional standard for current year November value will affect conventional standard for upcoming year
5
Extension and Outreach/Department of Economics H.R. 3097 Other Features Standard reductions do not apply to advanced biofuels No conventional biofuels can be used to meet the advanced biofuel standard
6
Extension and Outreach/Department of Economics Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS)
7
Extension and Outreach/Department of Economics Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS) Crop Year Billion Bushels 20114.64 20124.86 20135.07 20145.29
8
Extension and Outreach/Department of Economics Historical Corn Stocks-to-Use
9
Extension and Outreach/Department of Economics Historical Corn Stocks-to-Use
10
Extension and Outreach/Department of Economics Historical Triggers YearNovRFS Change JulyRFS Change 19967.41%15%3.73%50% 19989.95%10%16.25%0% 20038.68%10%10.50%0% 200413.46%0%8.69%10% 20077.93%10%10.00%10% 20098.97%10%14.79%0% 20116.16%15%6.61%15% 20126.69%15%???
11
Extension and Outreach/Department of Economics Production vs. Conventional RFS
12
Extension and Outreach/Department of Economics Oil Prices
13
Extension and Outreach/Department of Economics Oil Prices
14
Extension and Outreach/Department of Economics Ag and Energy Markets
15
Extension and Outreach/Department of Economics Ethanol Blending Advantage
16
Extension and Outreach/Department of Economics Iowa Corn Prices vs. Costs
17
Extension and Outreach/Department of Economics H.R. 3097 Effects Historical analysis shows conventional RFS reductions would be triggered roughly 1/3 rd of the time But the more important question is whether is the RFS is binding at the time If it is not, there is no effect from the reduction Since the RFS has been in place, the only time it may have been binding was for a couple of months during the recession when energy, specifically oil, prices were low
18
Extension and Outreach/Department of Economics H.R. 3097 Effects Given the current outlook for oil prices, the future likelihood of the conventional RFS binding is very low Thus, I would expect little to no impact from H.R. 3097 But there are two scenarios where H.R. 3097 does impact the crop markets 1.In combination with a recession, depressing already lower crop prices 2.A combination of low oil and high corn prices, driven by a significant crop production shortfall
19
Extension and Outreach/Department of Economics Thank you for your time! Any questions? My web site: http://www.econ.iastate.edu/~chart/ Iowa Farm Outlook: http://www.econ.iastate.edu/ifo/ Ag Decision Maker: http://www.extension.iastate.edu/agdm/
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.