1. Indiana’s Prescription Monitoring Program RFP 10-9 (Solicitation For: INSPECT)

2. What is INSPECT?  INSPECT is a state-managed data repository  INSPECT improves patient care and combats drug abuse and diversion  INSPECT oversees an 24/7-accessible web application that fills on average 1,900 report requests daily.  INSPECT currently has 8,282 users. However, we anticipate exponential growth.

3. General End User Breakdown (8,282)

4. How does INSPECT work?  Users registers for INSPECT Account  Users request prescription data uploaded by dispensing pharmacies  Disclaimer: The State of Indiana does not warrant the information on the INSPECT Patient RX History Reports to be accurate or complete.

5. Usage Guidelines All Users  All info via the web – internet required  No info by phone, fax, or personal inquiry  No info provided without an account  Password sent only to the user’s email

6. What are we looking for?  We are in search of a vendor who can provide a customizable off-the-shelf comprehensive solution.  The “ideal” off-the-shelf product must contain and provide the following:

7. Comprehensive Solution  24/7 Web Access  User Account Management Module  Password Management Module  Search Logic Module  Uploading of Data Module  Security and Auditing Module  Analytic Capabilities  Interoperability Capabilities

8. Search Logic (Common Problems Incurred) See page 30 (3.3 Search Features e and f)  In many cases, patients will purposely alter their personal information in order to avoid detection from the Prescription Monitoring Program. As a result, it is imperative that the PMP system have some type of search mechanism that will accurately group related data (such as, first and last name variations, date- of-births, and addresses) and exclude irrelevant data, improving overall search returns.  There are cases when patients share identical or similar information, (e.g. father and son, twins, etc). As a result, it is important that the system have the capability to accurately make a distinction between similar, albeit still unique patients, and ensure these inquires are processed accurately.

9. Search Logic Examples  Individuals with the same name and date-of-birth with multiple addresses.  First and last name variations including the date-of-birth: Robert Smith DOB: 04/21/1972 vs. Bob Smith DOB: 04/12/1972 nm Danny Rhoden, Sr. DOB: 02/10/1950 vs. Dan Rodem DOB: 06/21/1945 Shawn William vs. Sean William vs. Shawyn William  Twin scenario: Andrea Smith vs. Andrew Smith, DOB: 07/19/1984 with only two addresses being the same.  Individuals who share the same patient keys, maybe the same date-of-birth and all or some of the addresses are the same. Michael & Shelly Smith or Luann & Linda Smith

10. Key RFP Dates (2009)  RFP Issued On  Pre-Proposal Conference  Deadline to Submit Written Questions  Response to Written Questions/RFP Amendments  Submission of Proposals  August 20 th  September 1 st  September 3 rd  September 11 th  September 25th

11. Contact Information  Questions/Inquiries may be submitted via fax (317) 234-1281 or email rfp@idoa.IN.gov.rfp@idoa.IN.gov  An electronic copy of the RFP can be found on IDOA website http://www.IN.gov/idoa. A nominal fee will be charged for providing hard copies.http://www.IN.gov/idoa  NASPER Q&A Website: http://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/faq/rx_monitor.htm http://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/faq/rx_monitor.htm  Harold Rogers Q&A Website: http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/BJA/grant/prescripdrugs.html http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/BJA/grant/prescripdrugs.html

12. Questions???