Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Esther Spanjer, M-Systems. Competing Technologies: HDD vs Flash Flash Advantages Volume/GB Mass/GB Shock resistance Power Consumption HDD Advantages Total.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Esther Spanjer, M-Systems. Competing Technologies: HDD vs Flash Flash Advantages Volume/GB Mass/GB Shock resistance Power Consumption HDD Advantages Total."— Presentation transcript:

1 Esther Spanjer, M-Systems

2 Competing Technologies: HDD vs Flash Flash Advantages Volume/GB Mass/GB Shock resistance Power Consumption HDD Advantages Total Capacity $/GB Read/Write Speed No re-writing limits John Buttress,IDC

3 Key Specs: How Good is ‘Good Enough?’ Example: MP3 Players with HDD –Read ahead into DRAM for 20~32MB (~6sec), then power turned off. –= Non-op shock ruggedness, and power consumption minimized. 1.0” HDD avg. usage specs are in-class. 1.0” HDDFlash Memory Performance Read avg (MB/s)5.04.0 Write avg (MB/s)5.25.0 Power (mW) Idle602.9 Read (256K blocks )57782 Write (256K blocks) 575217 Ruggedness Non-Operating Shock 2000g Operating Shock200g2000g RewritesUnlimited 2 Limited: 100~300K cycles Notes: 1)Source: JP Morgan, Oct-04. 2)HDD manufacturers do not specify a limit to the number of times bits can be re-written. 3)Above are industry average specifications – individual performance by manufacturer/product may vary. Andy Higginbotham, Western Digital

4 Charles Lee, INTEL Visibility for scaling of floating gate clear to 32 nm Forms high “hurdle” for new technologies to leap 1986/1.5µm 1988/1.0µm 1991/0.8µm 1993/0.6µm 1996/0.4µm 1998/0.25µm 2000/0.18µm 2002/0.13µm 2004/90nm Moore’s Law” Continues with Floating Gate NVM 2006/65nm 2008/45nm 90 nm cell is 1/476 th of 1.5 µm cell

5 Flash Can Make HDDs Better Too Hybrid Drive for Longhorn chipset Digital Consumer Ideas for HDD/Flash Synergies Microsoft, WinHEC 2004 Don Barnetson, Samsung

6 System Cost vs. # of MB 10x 100x Jim Handy, SEMICO

7 Format Miniaturization Smaller, sub-Pico sliders –Challenging flyheight parameters –Refined flexure designs, capabilities –Improved processing, robustness Smaller disks and actuator system –Higher effective stiffnesses –Secondary focus on windage, resonance Jeffry Bennin, Hutchinson

8 Maximized Box Capacity… High areal density heads –ESD robustness Anti-static coatings Low resistance slider/preamp grounds –Transmission line performance Impedance matched lead designs Low loss materials and designs Active system components –High lead counts for dynamic fly- height actuators Jeffry Bennin, Hutchinson

9 Summary and Conclusions Today, 1 Inch HDD Offer Best $/GB, 1/3 X Flash NAND Flash: Rapid Technology Progress, AD Exceeds Moore’s Law Future $/GB Flash Has Potential Toward Lower $/GB But Continued Rapid Technology Progress In Flash Doubtful HDD Must Accelerate AD Growth, Flash Must Increase Rewrite Cyles >1.0 Inch FF HDD, High Risk Competitive With Flash, But Mobile Phone Volumes Worth The Risk Same Component Technology (Heads and Media) High Volumes Equals Low Cost In The Mobile/Consumer Market, Flash and SFF HDD Will Continue To Coexist Ed Grochowski


Download ppt "Esther Spanjer, M-Systems. Competing Technologies: HDD vs Flash Flash Advantages Volume/GB Mass/GB Shock resistance Power Consumption HDD Advantages Total."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google