1. “Goals”-more broad ideals than specific objectives Liberty Security Equity Efficiency (Note: Stone argues that, by the way it is understood in the market, “efficiency” rises above criticism) Nature of political debate: –Competition among these ideals –Competing interpre- tations of what a particular ideal means in a given situation –All interpretations of each ideal are contestable

2. Analyze alternative “framings” of the global warming issue: 1. Reduce human-made CO 2 omission 2. Reduce environmental vulnerability * How are various goals interpreted in each? *What (if any) goal trade-offs are implicit in either? *How (if at all) do goal interpretations, trade-offs change from Frame 1 to Frame 2? Liberty Security Equity Efficiency Nature of political debate: –Competition among these ideals –Competing interpretations of what a particular ideal means in a given situation –All interpretations of each ideal are contestable

3. [need to focus on the ideology of “market efficiency” as a framing strategy]—resulting in questions like: Can you find evidence of this market efficiency ideology in how the global warming issue is framed? Do market efficiency values clarify or obscure the issue of environmental vulnerability? Do market efficiency values clarify or obscure questions about who is accountable for policy problems?...any evidence in the global warming reading? Compare Stone’s treatment of “market efficiency” as a (politically potent) framing strategy with (most) economists’ rational viewpoints about the role of the market in society.