Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

A Study on Junior High Students ’ English Learning Achievement in Taiwan CamilaShelly January, 15, 2010.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "A Study on Junior High Students ’ English Learning Achievement in Taiwan CamilaShelly January, 15, 2010."— Presentation transcript:

1 A Study on Junior High Students ’ English Learning Achievement in Taiwan CamilaShelly January, 15, 2010

2 Things to Talk About: English Learning Achievement Test English Learning Achievement Test Item Analysis---IF, ID, DI, and BI Item Analysis---IF, ID, DI, and BI Research Questions Research Questions Statistics for Each RQ Statistics for Each RQ Q and A Q and A

3 English Learning Achievement Achievement Take a look at the test and its results of the statistics Take a look at the test and its results of the statistics Take a look at the test its results of the statistics Take a look at the test its results of the statistics Take a look at the revised test and doing the statistics analysis Take a look at the revised test and doing the statistics analysisat the revised test at the revised test

4 CRT OR NRT? Norm-Referenced Test---IF and ID Norm-Referenced Test---IF and ID If =Item facility: the proportion of students who answered a particular item correctly. If =Item facility: the proportion of students who answered a particular item correctly. ID= Item discrimination: ID= Item discrimination: ID= IF (upper1/3) – IF (lower1/3) ID= IF (upper1/3) – IF (lower1/3) Look at the excel: Look at the excel: Look at the excel: Look at the excel:

5 Criterion-Referenced Test Criterion-Referenced Test DI=Difference index: The item facility on the particular item for the posttest minus the item facility for that same item on the pretest. DI=Difference index: The item facility on the particular item for the posttest minus the item facility for that same item on the pretest. BI=B-index: the item facility on the particular item for the students who passed the test minus the item facility for the students who failed. BI=B-index: the item facility on the particular item for the students who passed the test minus the item facility for the students who failed.

6 Research Questions Are there any difference in English achievement between different genders? Are there any difference in English achievement between different genders? Does SES have a strong correlation with students ’ English grades in two classes? Does SES have a strong correlation with students ’ English grades in two classes? Does learning at cram school after school have a positive relationship with students ’ English grades in both classes? Does learning at cram school after school have a positive relationship with students ’ English grades in both classes?

7 Statistics for each RQ1: Are there any difference in English achievement between different genders? Are there any difference in English achievement between different genders?

8 Analyze->Descriptive-> Descriptives

9

10

11 Graphs->Legacy Dialogs-> Boxplot->simple->define

12

13 Box-plot-01

14 Graphs->Legacy Dialogs- > Boxplot->cluster

15

16 Boxplot-02

17 The mean of girls ’ English grades (85.42) is higher than boys ’ (79.76). The mean of girls ’ English grades (85.42) is higher than boys ’ (79.76). The standard deviation of girls ’ English grades (11.042)is lower than boys ’ (19.447). The standard deviation of girls ’ English grades (11.042)is lower than boys ’ (19.447).

18 Statistics for each RQ Does SES have a strong correlation with students ’ English grades in both classes? Does SES have a strong correlation with students ’ English grades in both classes?

19 Analyze->Descriptive Stat-> Descriptives

20

21 Results: **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). *. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). R=.1 ( 低相關 ) R=.3 ( 中相關 ) R=.5 ( 高相關 )

22

23

24 Scatterplot — class 306 (effect size=.461 高相關 ) Effect size=.01(samll).09(Median).25(Large)

25 Scatterplot — class 311 (effect size=.154 中相關 )

26 Statistics for each RQ Does learning at cram school after school have a positive relationship with students ’ English grades in both classes? Does learning at cram school after school have a positive relationship with students ’ English grades in both classes?

27

28

29 Statistics for each RQ3:

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37


Download ppt "A Study on Junior High Students ’ English Learning Achievement in Taiwan CamilaShelly January, 15, 2010."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google