Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAbraham Anderson Modified over 9 years ago
1
Compliance with Lau v. Nichols u Why is this an issue? u What has been done? u What needs to be done? u Where do we go from here?
2
THE ISSUE: US V. THEM “Language can thus emerge as an important rallying point in boundary maintenance, as a way of defining ‘us’ in comparison to ‘them’.” (Valdes)
3
Numbers u Increasing enrollment of limited English proficient students. (1990-95: 17 states reported ELL enrollment jumps of 10%, 7 states reported increases of more than 25%.) u Retention and dropout rates for LEP students higher than for English speakers. (1992, 42% of students aged 16-24 who reported difficulty with English had dropped out of high school.)
4
Add to the mix: accountability through testing u One size fits all testing and accountability u Accreditation of schools based on number of children passing high stakes tests. u Standards rising. New York English Regents Exam. Virginia SOL requirements for graduation.
5
Hey! But they don’t speak English! Can’t we just let them sit and forget about them?
6
Legal guarantees and guidelines u Civil Rights legislation – Bilingual Education Act (1968) – Equal Educational Opportunity Act (1974) u Supreme Court Decisions – Lau v. Nichols (1974) – Castaneda v. Pickard (1981)
7
Programs u Bilingual education – Transitional – Dual language, immersion – # ESL alone – ESL in combination with bilingual education
8
What needs to be done? The legislation is in place but the commitment is not there on the part of states, school districts and schools.
9
WHY??? u Economics u Logistics u POLITICS
10
Political Issue u Majority v. minority language power play u Misunderstanding of the goals of bilingual education u Allocation of resources within schools and school districts u Silent constituency
11
Research agenda u Education – Of the public – Of educators – Of parents of language minority students u Educational practices – For changing demographics – For non-literate students – For U.S. born non-language dominant students
12
Conclusion u Vision = Keyword – As instructional leaders we need to have a vision of how we see the student immigrant population in our society. – Research – Action
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.