1. INTERTANKO LATIN AMERICAN PANEL MARITIME SECURITY: LATEST DEVELOPMENTS LATEST DEVELOPMENTS AT IMO JOSEPH J. ANGELO DIRECTOR, REGULATORY AFFAIRS AND THE AMERICAS 25 APRIL 2006

2. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS TRAINING/CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR SHIP SECURITY OFFICERTRAINING/CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR SHIP SECURITY OFFICER TRAINING/CERTIFICATION GUIDELINES FOR COMPANY SECURITY OFFICERTRAINING/CERTIFICATION GUIDELINES FOR COMPANY SECURITY OFFICER TRAINING/CERTIFICATION GUIDELINES FOR PORT FACILITY SECURITY OFFICERSTRAINING/CERTIFICATION GUIDELINES FOR PORT FACILITY SECURITY OFFICERS GUIDANCE ON ACCESS OF AUTHORITIESGUIDANCE ON ACCESS OF AUTHORITIES GUIDANCE ON TONNAGE MEASUREMENTGUIDANCE ON TONNAGE MEASUREMENT LONG RANGE IDENTIFICATION & TRACKINGLONG RANGE IDENTIFICATION & TRACKING

3. SHIP SECURITY OFFICER MANDATORY TRAINING AND CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTSMANDATORY TRAINING AND CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS MSC 80 APPROVED AMENDMENTS TO STCW CONVENTIONMSC 80 APPROVED AMENDMENTS TO STCW CONVENTION AMENDMENTS TO BE ADOPTED AT MSC 81 IN MAY 2006AMENDMENTS TO BE ADOPTED AT MSC 81 IN MAY 2006 SCHEDULED TO ENTER INTO FORCE 1 JANUARY 2008SCHEDULED TO ENTER INTO FORCE 1 JANUARY 2008

4. SHIP SECURITY OFFICER STCW AMENDMENTS – -INTRODUCE NEW REGULATIONS VI/5 -REQUIRE STANDARDS OF COMPETENCE -ALLOWS PARTIES TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL TRAINING IS NEEDED FOR CURRENT SHIP SECURITY OFFICERS -ALLOWS FOR 1YEAR INTERIM PERIOD (1 JANUARY 2009)

5. SHIP SECURITY OFFICER COMPETENCIES (IN STCW CODE) ARE – -MAINTAINING A SHIP SECURITY PLAN -ASSESSING SECURITY RISK/THREAT -INSPECTIONS TO ENSURE SECURITY MEASURES ARE IMPLEMENTED -ENSURING THAT SECURITY EQUIPMENT OPERATES PROPERLY -ENCOURAGING SECURITY AWARENESS

6. COMPANY SECURITY OFFICER GUIDELINES ADOPTED FOR TRAINING AND CERTIFICATION (NOT MANDATORY)GUIDELINES ADOPTED FOR TRAINING AND CERTIFICATION (NOT MANDATORY) STCW CONVENTION NOT APPROPRIATE INSTRUMENT FOR SHORE-BASEDSTCW CONVENTION NOT APPROPRIATE INSTRUMENT FOR SHORE-BASED RECOMMENDS STANDARDS OF COMPETENCERECOMMENDS STANDARDS OF COMPETENCE RECOMMENDS DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE FOR THOSE COMPLETING TRAININGRECOMMENDS DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE FOR THOSE COMPLETING TRAINING

7. COMPANY SECURITY OFFICER RECOMMENDED COMPETENCIES – - MAINTAINING A SHIP SECURITY PLAN -ASSESSING SECURITY RISK/THREAT -INSPECTIONS TO ENSURE SECURITY MEASURES ARE IMPLEMENTED -ENSURING THAT SECURITY EQUIPMENT OPERATES PROPERLY -ENCOURAGING SECURITY AWARENESS

8. PORT FACILITY SECURITY OFFICER STW SUBCOMMITTEE INSTRUCTED TO DEVELOPED GUIDELINES FOR TRAINING AND CERTIFICATIONSTW SUBCOMMITTEE INSTRUCTED TO DEVELOPED GUIDELINES FOR TRAINING AND CERTIFICATION BASED ON TRAINING, DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES IN ISPS CODEBASED ON TRAINING, DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES IN ISPS CODE GUIDELINES SHOULD ADDRESS COMPETENCE, KNOWLEDGE, PROFICIENCIES AND CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING COMPETENCEGUIDELINES SHOULD ADDRESS COMPETENCE, KNOWLEDGE, PROFICIENCIES AND CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING COMPETENCE

9. PORT FACILITY SECURITY OFFICER US HAS SUBMITTED PROPOSAL TO STW 37US HAS SUBMITTED PROPOSAL TO STW 37 RECOMMENDED COMPETENCIES:RECOMMENDED COMPETENCIES: - MAINTAINING A FACILITY SECURITY PLAN - ASSESSING SECURITY RISK/THREAT - INSPECTIONS TO ENSURE SECURITY MEASURES ARE IMPLEMENTED - ENSURING THAT SECURITY EQUIPMENT OPERATES PROPERLY - ENCOURAGING SECURITY AWARENESS

10. ACCESS OF AUTHORITIES MSC AGREED THAT STRICT APPLICATION OF ACCESS CONTROL MEASURES MIGHT NOT BE CONDUCIVE TO SAFETY OF SHIPMSC AGREED THAT STRICT APPLICATION OF ACCESS CONTROL MEASURES MIGHT NOT BE CONDUCIVE TO SAFETY OF SHIP GUIDANCE FOR ACCESS OF PUBLIC AUTHORITIES, EMERGENCY RESPONSE SERVICES AND PILOTSGUIDANCE FOR ACCESS OF PUBLIC AUTHORITIES, EMERGENCY RESPONSE SERVICES AND PILOTS FOCUSES ON IDENTIFICATION, SEARCHES, ESCORTS, RESTRICTED ACCESS AND CARRIAGE OF FIREARMSFOCUSES ON IDENTIFICATION, SEARCHES, ESCORTS, RESTRICTED ACCESS AND CARRIAGE OF FIREARMS

11. ACCESS OF AUTHORITIES PRESENT AN IDENTITY DOCUMENTPRESENT AN IDENTITY DOCUMENT NOT SUBJECT TO SEARCHESNOT SUBJECT TO SEARCHES ESCORT, IF NECESSARY AND POSSIBLEESCORT, IF NECESSARY AND POSSIBLE ACCESS TO RESTRICTED AREAS ONCE REASON HAS BEEN ESTABLISHEDACCESS TO RESTRICTED AREAS ONCE REASON HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED NOT BE ASKED TO SURRENDER THEIR FIREARMSNOT BE ASKED TO SURRENDER THEIR FIREARMS

12. ACCESS OF AUTHORITIES GUIDELINES FOR SHIPS PERSONNEL – - REQUEST ID DOCUMENTS AND PURPOSE OF VISIT - RECORD DETAILS OF ID DOCUMENT - ESCORT VISITOR WITHOUT DELAY - ADVISE MASTER AND SSO OF ARRIVAL OF VISITORS - IF THERE IS REASON TO DOUBT, VERIFY AUTHENTICITY OF ID

13. TONNAGE MEASUREMENT SOME CARGO SHIPS OVER 500 GRT NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH ISPS CODESOME CARGO SHIPS OVER 500 GRT NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH ISPS CODE SOME ADMINISTRATIONS APPLIED INTERIM TONNAGE SCHEME AND USED NATIONAL TONNAGE MEASUREMENTSOME ADMINISTRATIONS APPLIED INTERIM TONNAGE SCHEME AND USED NATIONAL TONNAGE MEASUREMENT MSC 80 AGREED THAT TONNAGE FOR APPLICABILITY OF ISPS CODE SHALL BE 1969 TONNAGE CONVENTIONMSC 80 AGREED THAT TONNAGE FOR APPLICABILITY OF ISPS CODE SHALL BE 1969 TONNAGE CONVENTION MUST COMPLY BY 1 JULY 2008MUST COMPLY BY 1 JULY 2008

14. LRIT PART OF INITIAL US JANUARY 2002 MARITIME SECURITY PROPOSALSPART OF INITIAL US JANUARY 2002 MARITIME SECURITY PROPOSALS AIM IS TO ENHANCE MARITIME DOMAIN AWARENESSAIM IS TO ENHANCE MARITIME DOMAIN AWARENESS HAS MET RESISTANCE AT IMO –HAS MET RESISTANCE AT IMO – - OTHERS MONITOR SHIP LOCATIONS - OTHERS MONITOR SHIP CARGOES - MONITOR FOR SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL REASONS

15. LRIT MSC LRIT WORKING GROUP MET IN OCT 2005 TO ADDRESS POLICY ISSUESMSC LRIT WORKING GROUP MET IN OCT 2005 TO ADDRESS POLICY ISSUES COMSAR SUBCOMMITTEE MET IN MARCH 2006 TO ADDRESS TECHNICAL ISSUESCOMSAR SUBCOMMITTEE MET IN MARCH 2006 TO ADDRESS TECHNICAL ISSUES MSC 81 (MAY 2006) WILL CONSIDER AMENDMENTS TO SOLASMSC 81 (MAY 2006) WILL CONSIDER AMENDMENTS TO SOLAS ENTRY INTO FORCE DATE –ENTRY INTO FORCE DATE – 1 JANUARY 2008 ??? 1 JANUARY 2008 ???

16. LRIT COMSAR SUBCOMMITTEE HAS DEVELOPED PERFORMANCE STANDARD TO ADDRESS: - SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE - FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS - DATA SECURITY - COORDINATOR ROLE & OVERSIGHT

17. LRIT MAJOR OUTSTANDING POLICY ISSUES – -APPLICATION TO COASTAL STATES (SHIPS IN INNOCENT PASSAGE) -HOW FAR OUT (2000 MILES??) -PORT STATE CAPACITY WHEN SHIP IN WATERS OF ANOTHER PORT STATE

18. LRIT INDUSTRY CONCERNS NO COST TO SHIPOWNER TO SEND A POSITION MESSAGENO COST TO SHIPOWNER TO SEND A POSITION MESSAGE NO ADDITIONAL SHIP CARRIAGE REQUIREMENTNO ADDITIONAL SHIP CARRIAGE REQUIREMENT MESSAGE LIMITED TO IDENTITY OF SHIP, POSITION AND DATE/TIMEMESSAGE LIMITED TO IDENTITY OF SHIP, POSITION AND DATE/TIME