1. DZero Run IIb PMG January 28, 2003 1 Agenda Run IIb D-Zero PMG January 28, 2003  Overview, issues (Kotcher)  Project status (O’Dell)  Trigger technical status (Wood)  AOB Jon Kotcher DZero Run IIb PMG January 28, 2003

2. DZero Run IIb PMG January 28, 2003 2 Run IIb Project Organization D0 Run IIb Project J. Kotcher, Project Manager R. Partridge, Deputy; V. O’Dell, Associate; W. Freeman, Assistant M. Johnson, Technical Coordinator C. Yoshikawa, Budget Officer; T. Erickson, Administration WBS 1.1 Silicon M. Demarteau TBD 1.1.1 Sensors R. Demina, F. Lehner 1.1.2 Readout System A. Nomerotski, E. von Toerne 1.1.4 QA, Testing, & Burn-in C. Gerber, TBD 1.1.3, 1.1.5 Mechanics & Assembly W. Cooper, K. Krempetz 1.1.6 Monitoring M. Corcoran, S. de Jong 1.1.4 Production J. Fast, TBD 1.1.7 Software & Simulation F. Rizatdinova, L Shabalina WBS 1.2 Trigger H. Evans D. Wood 1.2.3 L1 Track Trigger M. Narain 1.2.1 L1 Cal Upgrade M. Abolins, (H. Evans), P. LeDu 1.2.4 L2  Upgrade R. Hirosky 1.2.5 Silicon Track Trigger U. Heintz WBS 1.3 DAQ/Online S. Fuess P. Slattery 1.2.2 L1 Cal/Track Match K. Johns 1.2.6 Simulation M. Hildreth, E. Perez WBS 1.5 Installation R. Smith 1.5.1 Silicon Installation Mechanical: H. Lubatti Electronics: L. Bagby, R. Sidwell 1.5.2 Trigger Installation D. Edmunds WBS 1.4 Project Administration 1.2.7 Administration (D. Wood) 1.1.8 Administration (M. Demarteau) 1.3.3 Control Systems F. Bartlett, G. Savage, V. Sirotenko 1.3.1 Level 3 Systems D. Chapin, G. Watts 1.3.4 DAQ/Online Management (P. Slattery) 1.3.2 Network & Host Systems J. Fitzmaurice, S. Krzywdzinski Red: Today’s speakers Blue: New silicon co-leader will be in place Mar 1 Agreement with Alice Bean was one year, ended Aug ’02 Two silicon Level 3 subsystems need co-leaders

3. DZero Run IIb PMG January 28, 2003 3 Overview of Status  Schedule “statussed” for Dec 1-31 time period (talk by O’Dell) u Second full shot since Nov 4-8 EIR  Monthly effort reports being handled in straightforward manner u Work package assignments to individuals’ effort made by WBS Level 3 personnel in hour or two u Returned to Project Office, double-checked before sending to PPD  Lunar report cycle: u Wk –1: Effort reports finalized u Wk 1-2: Status schedule, collect monthly report information u Wk 3: Integrate information, edit reports, identify change control, discuss with project u Wk 4: Report Laboratory, hand in to DOE  First monthly report drafted (bootstrapped from NuMI report) u Overview of project status u Milestone status & summary (includes Gantt) u Narrative highlights to WBS Level 3 u Variance analysis u Cost reports s Tables to WBS Level 3, plots to WBS Level 2 s Pending final approval, only BCWS available

4. DZero Run IIb PMG January 28, 2003 4 Overview of Status  Have suggested COBRA/reporting meeting with all principals u Want to have final machinery in place in anticipation of FY03 spending approval; many details to consider, commonality: s Inclusion (or not) of R&D s Handling of pass-through s COBRA report output s Change control/variance thresholds s Timing of consultant visit s Finalize form of monthly reports s Tracking university costs s Integration of actuals s … u OPMO on board, setting it up s “Office of Project Management Oversight”  First Production Readiness Review will take place Jan 30 u “Purple Card” for silicon readout during testing, production u Does not go in final detector, used for stand-alone testing at SiDet u Was useful test bed for PRR process, worked quite smoothly

5. DZero Run IIb PMG January 28, 2003 5 Purple Card PRR  Review Committee: u C. Gerber (UIC) u J. Green (Fermilab) u K. Hanagaki (Fermilab) u S. Lager (Stockholm) u R. Lipton (Fermilab, Chair) u R. Sidwell (KSU)

6. DZero Run IIb PMG January 28, 2003 6 Some Near-Term Silicon Milestones Six Major Upcoming Silicon Milestones Project Target Date Current Forecast Baseline Date Comments Silicon Prototype Mechanical Stave Built 12/16/0312/18/031/6/03Major integration milestone – was met L2-L5 Sensors Released for Production 2/11/032/18/033/24/03Further delays expected; characterizing sensors. Should not extend to baseline date. SVX4 Released for Production7/10/038/19/0310/20/03Excellent performance of initial prototype Successful Fabrication of Electrical-Grade Pre- Production Silicon Stave* 7/17/037/24/0310/10/03Major integration milestone Successful Readout of Full Silicon Stave 10/10/0310/17/031/29/04Major integration milestone Silicon Module Production Begun 2/16/04 5/17/04Remains on track * Not a DOE L2/Director’s Milestone Forecasts remain well ahead of baseline dates

7. DZero Run IIb PMG January 28, 2003 7 Some Near-Term Level 1 Trigger Milestones Five Major Upcoming Silicon Milestones Project Target Date Current Forecast Baseline Date Comments L1 ADF shipped to Fermilab5/2/036/23/037/11/03Saclay designing, fabricating L1 cal front-end L1 Calorimeter Trigger TAB/GAB Prototype Complete 7/16/037/15/039/29/03Columbia/Nevis ADF+TAB Prototype Integration7/17/037/16/039/30/03Major integration milestone: in-situ integration summer ’03 L1 CTT Algorithm Firmware Coded & Simulated with FPGA Simulation Tools 7/17/037/11/039/15/03First major L1 CTT milestone Fabrication & assembly of L1 Trigger Cal-TRK Match MTCM complete 10/20/03 11/10/03Completion of production; based on current muon trigger cards Forecasts remain well ahead of baseline dates Level 2 trigger, online begin later

8. DZero Run IIb PMG January 28, 2003 8 Run IIb Labor  Request for full-time electronics technician for silicon made at last PMG (Dec 10) u Commissioning and maintenance of existing testing, burn-in stands u Cecil Needles joining us, first introductory tour scheduled for this week  Other technical needs covered at the moment  Project Office continually asking project to anticipate their manpower requirements u Collaboration help as well as FNAL technical staff u Lead times can be unwieldy

9. DZero Run IIb PMG January 28, 2003 9 Labor Cost Extracted from Schedule vs. Actuals (R&D) Actuals: Oct = $168.5k, Nov = $132.8k (FY03 k$) No contingency or G&A in schedule prediction Agreement quite good, but earned value is real measure (actuals, COBRA) Actuals in FY02 k$ Scheduled labor in FY02 k$ Updated for Dec/Jan as soon as information from PPD is available

10. DZero Run IIb PMG January 28, 2003 10 Comments  Significant Lab-wide parallel efforts (shutdown) never come for free, but impact on Run IIb not as serious as initially thought u Loss of IIb SiDet personnel to Beams Division ameliorated by extra effort from other project principals u Experts within DZero redirected to Collision Hall work, but for reasonably short amount of time u Inter-cryostat gaps photographed, mapped out – required for further Run IIb design work u We have no argument whatsoever with the priorities!!!  I am going to begin assuming that accelerator will run only at 396 nsec u Studies & document outlining utility of SIFT upgrade for physics at 396 nsec being completed (Bross, Hildreth, et al.) u In event SIFT is deemed to be unnecessary, personnel on SIFT project should be redirected within DZero u Have particular interest in integrating P. Rubinov into group of Run II(b) electronics experts – sore and obvious need u Formal statement on 132 from Lab would be useful u Will discuss privately with Mont, et al.

11. DZero Run IIb PMG January 28, 2003 11 Comments  Jan 18-23 trip to France to discuss terms of Saclay involvement in Level 1 Calorimeter Trigger very productive u Responsible for front-end (ADF) trigger boards – ADC/Digital Filtering u LHC commitments might compete with proper Run IIb completion u Saclay has agreed to seek extension of their involvement beyond initially proposed 2005 time scale  Things like: u Delays in obtaining FY03 spending approval u Further bottoms-up evaluations of Run IIb project  …send very powerful message. Make it increasingly difficult to maintain committed core of upgrade groups and personnel.

12. DZero Run IIb PMG January 28, 2003 12 Conclusions  Project making steady, solid technical progress  No change control thresholds yet encountered, but SVX4 is on (schedule) cusp  Project tracking machinery being continually developed & shaken out  COBRA and its implementation an important ingredient to nail down now  Lead time associated with labor requests might grow into a concern as project heats up  Will try on our end to make our requests as early on, and as well-defined, as possible  Cultural stasis exhibited by all entities poses a continuous difficulty – schedule drives these projects!