Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byEvelyn Fletcher Modified over 9 years ago
1
ECONOMICAL VIABILITY OF THE NUCLEAR OPTION IN MEXICO Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Nucleares
2
45,576 MW Installed Capacity Fossil Fuel 66.8% Gas 32% CFE-2005
3
Electricity Generation 215.63 TWh Nuclear contributes with about 5% since 1996 CFE-2005 Gas 52%
4
Forecast for Electricity Gross Consumption An increase of about 60% from 2005 to 2014 2000-2014
5
Required Capacity There should be an addition of 22,126 MW 6,184 MW already Committed 15,942 MW Non Committed 9,764 Technology already specified 6,178 Free Technology
6
The Case for Nuclear High Volatility of Gas Prices Concern for CO2 Emissions Balanced Fuel Mix Economical Competitiveness
7
Levelized Cost Methodology Quantifies the unitary cost of electricity (the kWh) during the lifetime of a power plant The methodology considers the total electrical energy that the power plant will deliver in its lifetime
8
Levelized Cost Methodology Levelized cost is the sum of: Investment cost: which is the one generated during construction Production cost: is the one generated during the life of the plant, it includes Fuel cost and Operation and maintenance costs
9
OECD-2005 Levelized Total Generation Cost Benchmarking Plant Type DR % OECD USD/MWh ININ USD/MWh Min.Max.Min.Max. Gas5376038.7356.36 Nuclear5213123.0331.39 Gas10406341.7959.42 Nuclear10305032.7545.76
10
Scenarios DR % 5 10 Gas Price$/MBTU 4.44 5.20 7.00 Nuclear Construction Cost (Output 1350 MWe) $/kWe 1200 1400 1600
11
Assumptions Plant TypeGasCoalNuclear Lifetime (Years)2540 Capacity Factor (%)80 90 Proper Uses (%)3.17.33.1 Power Output (MWe)5607001350 Thermal Efficiency (%)5237.2434 Construction Time (Years)245 Overnigth Cost (USD/kWe)4501000 1200 1400 1600 Fuel Cost * USD/mmBTU + USD/MWh 4.44 * 5.20 * 7.00 * 1.78 * 6.80 + O&M cost (USD/MWh)2.774.757.83
12
Generation Cost (DR)
13
Capital Cost (DR)
14
Nuclear Generation Cost Assuming Delays
15
Levelized electricity generating cost assuming different capacity factors
16
Cash Flow* Type of Plant Investment Cost USD/kWe Power MWe Annual Gross Energy MWe 0&M Cost x10 6 USD/yr Gas4505603,802,82110 Nuclear Medium 1400135010,359,29276 *Without fuel costs
17
Present Value of the Cash Flow (DR 8%) Gas1 4.44 $/mmBTU; Gas2 5.20 $/mmBTU; Gas3 7.00 $/mmBTU
18
Generating Cost variability Due to Fuel Price Gas price at 0% is 4.44 USD/MBTU and Nuclear Fuel Cost is 6.80 USD/MWh –40% it is about 2.50 USD/mmBTU for the Gas price
19
Summary Even with delays of up to 3 years nuclear is competitive with the gas option, and it is still cheaper when gas price is greater or equal to 7 USD/mmBTU. Considering an 80% capacity factor, instead of 90% results in an increase of 4 USD/MW in the levelized cost.
20
Summary (cont.) When the price of gas is not less than 5.20 USD/mmBTU, the levelized cost of nuclear generated electricity is lower than the cost resulting from using natural gas, as long as construction time is not longer than 7 years.
21
Conclusion Nuclear power is competitive in all the scenarios considered, and it should be given serious consideration in the definition of Mexico’s additional electrical capacity program.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.