Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Lance Fortnow Northwestern University.  Markets as Computational Devices Aggregate large amount of disparate information by massively parallel devices.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Lance Fortnow Northwestern University.  Markets as Computational Devices Aggregate large amount of disparate information by massively parallel devices."— Presentation transcript:

1 Lance Fortnow Northwestern University

2  Markets as Computational Devices Aggregate large amount of disparate information by massively parallel devices into a small number of security prices.  Computationally-Bounded Agents Agents may not be able to compute the consequences of their actions.  Modeling Phenomenon Computational explanations for economic puzzles.

3 CD C(3,3)(0,4) D(4,0)(1,1)

4 CD C(3,3)(0,4) D(4,0)(1,1) Can get cooperation if we have more rounds than states.

5  Turing Machine  Advantages Captures Computation (Church-Turing Thesis) Universal Simulation  Can take very long time, maybe never halt.

6  Hartmanis-Stearns, Edmonds, Cobham Running time bounded by a polynomial in the length of the input. The “P” in P versus NP.  Problems in Applying to Economic Models No clear notion of input length. Race condition: Whichever player has the larger polynomial can simulate the other but not vice versa. Hard to predict.

7 HT H(2,1)(1,2) T (2,1) s states After s 3 rounds the Turing machine will always win

8  Ben-Sasson, Kalai, Kalai m, r are integers at least 2 If r is a prime factor of m then  Bob’s payoff is 2 and Alice’s payoff is 1 Otherwise  Alice’s payoff is 2 and Bob’s payoff is 1 m r

9  Computation time in a Turing machine is measure by the number of unit operations.  Discount payoff of Alice of a game by  A t A where t A is the number of steps used by Alice.  Similarly for Bob.  For today’s technology:   1-10 -12 A few million computation steps will have a negligible effect on the payoff.

10  The following are roughly equivalent Factoring cannot be solved efficiently on average over an easily samplable distribution. For every c,  >0, there is a  >0   A = (1-  )  B = (1-  c )  In  -equilibrium, Alice receives at least 2-  m r

11  Program Equilibria Each player is program that has the program code of the other player. One Shot Game Folk Theorems  Forecast Testing Forecasters may require large computational power to fool testers.  Prediction Markets  Preference Revelation  Loopholes in Laws and Contracts  Computational Awareness

12  Apply discounted-time idea to computational complexity.  Explain Chess-like games Create model that where bounded-search followed by evaluation is close to an equilibrium.  Efficient Market Hypothesis Do markets efficiently aggregate information? Are market prices “indistinguishable” from aggregate value? Can a slightly smarter agent consistently “beat the market”?


Download ppt "Lance Fortnow Northwestern University.  Markets as Computational Devices Aggregate large amount of disparate information by massively parallel devices."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google