1. The future of Transfer Alison Mitchell, co-Chair, Transfer

2. Unpleasant surprises… “Where’s the journal I paid for?”

3. Common complaints… 91.4% of librarians surveyed* feel that the transfer of journals between publishers causes them “very” or “fairly” significant problems Almost 50% of respondents spend a lot of time amending serials management systems and internal records as the result of a transfer The area where the highest percentage of respondents said they have often experienced problems was “subscription information” (delays in data being transferred to the new publishers, intermediaries not being informed) When asked to list the two most significant transfer issues that cause them problems, librarians mainly cited access to current content and the time required to amend their systems. Access to archives/backfiles, big deals, and pricing were also cited *ICOLC/Transfer survey, May 2011 164 respondents 65% North America, 14% Europe, 14.5% Asia-Pacific

4. Problems for publishers too Publishers were surveyed* in their roles as both ‘Transferring’ and ‘Receiving’ Publishers The area where the highest percentage of Transferring Publishers had often experienced problems was in the transfer of subscriber information. Over 70% of respondents sometimes or often had problems in this area Many Transferring Publishers did not know whether there had been communication with a large number of third-party organisations, including A&I services and link resolver companies The areas where the highest percentage of Receiving Publishers had often experienced problems were the receipt of subscriber information and content files 55% of Receiving publishers grace online access to existing subscribers for one month or more 60% of respondents did not have a central coordinator responsible for overseeing the transfer of journal publishing arrangements *Transfer survey, June 2011 151 respondents 34 commercial publishers; 8 NFPs; 16 societies; 7 university presses

5. We prescribe… A voluntary Code containing best practice guidelines for both Transferring and Receiving Publishers Established in 2006, Version 2.0 launched in September 2008 Endorsed by 36 publishers, including Elsevier, Wiley, Springer, T&F, OUP, T&F, Wolters Kluwer, Sage Transfer alerting service – 378 registrants (mainly librarians), 215 transfers announced to date www.uksg.org/transfer

6. Key areas treated For the Transferring Publisher and the Receiving Publisher: Access to the title: Includes ensuring continued access to customers where the Transferring Publisher has granted perpetual access rights Digital content files — current (born digital) and archive (digitized from print), if available: Covers transfer of digital files Subscription lists: Covers early transfer of the subscription lists and an outline of subscriber data types Journal URL: Covers transfer of journal-related domain name(s) and provision of a link or redirect to the new journal home page Communication: Covers communication to customers (including electronic table of contents alert recipients) and relevant intermediaries DOI name ownership: Covers changes to Digital Object Identifier (DOI) name ownership

7. Does it work? By registering as Transfer compliant, publishers agree to abide – where commercially possible – by the terms of the Transfer Code Librarians and societies are increasingly asking for Transfer compliance in their licensing and contractual arrangements with publishers Various other reports and initiatives are citing Transfer’s work and recommending compliance (JISC Collections, RIN) But… It’s hard to give the Code more ‘teeth’, as we must be careful to avoid anticompetitive practices A recent informal list serv poll identified ongoing issues, some involving Transfer-compliant publishers

8. So, what’s next? Transfer Working Group – 8 publishers, 5 librarians and 6 others – meets every 2 months New co-Chairs for 2011, Elizabeth Winter (Georgia Institute of Technology) and Alison Mitchell (Nature Publishing Group) 2011 priorities: –Revision: Revise and update the Code –Education: Educate the main constituencies (librarians, publishers and societies) about the problems and priorities of the others –Database: Update the Transfer Alerting service and use the data to populate a searchable database of transfer information

9. Revision of the Code Some of the areas that are under consideration (not explicitly covered in Version 2.0, or in need of updating): Recommend use of the Transfer alerting service and new database? Suggest changes that publishers can make in the event of a transfer to ensure that the articles are still discoverable by search engines? Consider including guidelines about redirecting apps and social media sites (eg Facebook, podcast archive)? Transfer of email alerts – there may be data protection issues, but at a minimum the Transferring Publisher might contact the registrants and give a link for future sign-up at the Receiving Publisher’s site? Transferring Publisher to identify and pass on information about existing discovery services and link resolvers? Preservation-related registries - Transferring Publisher to make it clear whether content will stay as part of an existing arrangement?

10. Education – who needs to know what? Publishers –Need to understand the effects of transfers on librarians, and the steps that they can take to mitigate or remove these effects –Central coordination of transfer activities helps with communication –Better understanding of what links resolvers are and how they are used –Encouragement to endorse Transfer actively Societies: –Need to understand the above, and also to ensure that the terms of their contracts with the Transferring and Receiving Publishers are consistent and workable Librarians: –Briefing on the complexities of data transfer –Briefing on the transfer process – why do transfers happen mid year? Why is there often so little time? Where can they look for information?

11. Database and enhanced alerting JISC funding has been approved for the ETAS (Enhanced Transfer Alerting Service) MIMAS will host and run the service as part of JUSP (Journal Usage Statistics Portal) Initial design work is under way, and the project is expected to be completed by the end of October 2011 Transfer-compliant publishers complete a simple form, which is circulated by e-mail and the details are automatically entered in to the database In the mean time, librarians or publishers can sign up for the Transfer alerting service at: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/TRANSFER

12. Our publishers ALPSP American Diabetes Association American Institution of Physics American Psychological Association Berg Publishers Biomed Central Brill Publishers Cambridge University Press Co-Action Publishing Earthscan Publishers Edinburgh University Press Elsevier Emerald European Respiratory Society Future Science GUD Publishing IOP IOS Press Liverpool University Press Manchester University Press Nature Publishing Group Oxford University Press Palgrave Macmillan Pier Professional Portland Press Royal Society of Chemistry Rural Sociological Society Rockefeller University Press Sage Publications Society for General Microbiology Springer Symposium Journals Taylor & Francis Walter de Gruyter Wiley Blackwell Wolters Kluwer Health

13. Please join us! Please help us! www.uksg.org/transfer a.mitchell@nature.com www.uksg.org/transfer a.mitchell@nature.com