Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1/31 E. S. Hori, Self-optimizing control… Self-optimizing control configurations for two-product distillation columns Eduardo Shigueo Hori, Sigurd Skogestad.

Published byKristian Smith Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "1/31 E. S. Hori, Self-optimizing control… Self-optimizing control configurations for two-product distillation columns Eduardo Shigueo Hori, Sigurd Skogestad."— Presentation transcript:

1 1/31 E. S. Hori, Self-optimizing control… Self-optimizing control configurations for two-product distillation columns Eduardo Shigueo Hori, Sigurd Skogestad Norwegian University of Science and Technology – NTNU N-7491 Trondheim, Norway Muhammad Al-Arfaj King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals - KFUPM

2 2/31 E. S. Hori, Self-optimizing control… Outline 1.Introduction. Indirect composition control 2.Alternative approaches for selecting controlled variables 3.Temperature profile heuristic 4. Self-optimizing control: Exact local method 4.1 Results for binary distillation columns 4.2 Results for multicomponent distillation columns 5. Conclusions

3 3/31 E. S. Hori, Self-optimizing control… 1. Introduction Distillation column with given feed and pressure: Two steady- state degrees of freedom Issue: What should we control (”fix”) to achieve indirect composition control? Disturbances: - feed flow (F), - feed composition (z F ) - feed enthalpy (q F ) Notation Stages: - top and bottom (both 0%) - feed (100%)

4 4/31 E. S. Hori, Self-optimizing control… Variables available for control: - temperatures - flows (including flow ratios L/D, L/F, etc) -15 different binary columns -4 multicomponent columns No single ”best” structure for all columns Find reasonable structure for most columns

5 5/31 E. S. Hori, Self-optimizing control… 2. Alternative approaches 1.Heuristic 1: Steep temperature profile 2.Heuristic 2: Small optimal variation for disturbances (Luyben, 1975) 3.Heuristic 3: Large sensitivity, or more generally, large gain in terms of the minimum singular value (Moore, 1992) 4.Self-optimizing control (Skogestad et al.) a. “Maximum scaled gain rule”: Combines heuristic 2 and 3 b. “Exact” local method (main method used in this work) c. Brute-force evaluation of loss What should we control (”fix”) to achieve indirect composition control?

6 6/31 E. S. Hori, Self-optimizing control… 3. Temperature profile (Heuristic method 1) Control a temperature where the temperature slope is large Slope rule makes sense from a dynamic point of view Initial gain → proportional to temperature difference BUT for Indirect composition control: steady state gain (sensitivity) is more important (maximum gain rule)

7 7/31 E. S. Hori, Self-optimizing control… Binary column slope closely correlated with steady state gain STAGE TEMPERATURE PROFILE

8 8/31 E. S. Hori, Self-optimizing control… Multicomponent column Slope NOT correlated with steady-state gain TEMPERATURE PROFILE Conclusion: Temperature slope OK only for binary columns

9 9/31 E. S. Hori, Self-optimizing control… 4. Self-optimizing control: Exact local method Evaluate ”local” steady-state composition deviation: e c includes: - disturbances (F, z F, q F ) - implementation measurement error (0.5 for T)

10 10/31 E. S. Hori, Self-optimizing control… Outline 1.Introduction. Indirect composition control 2.Alternative approaches for selecting controlled variables 3.Temperature profile heuristic 4. Self-optimizing control: Exact local method 4.1 Results for binary distillation columns 4.2 Results for multicomponent distillation columns 5. Conclusion

11 11/31 E. S. Hori, Self-optimizing control… Have looked at 15 binary columns Main focus on “column A” –40 theoretical stages –Feed in middle –1% impurity in each product –Relative volatility: 1.5 –Boiling point difference: 10K

12 12/31 E. S. Hori, Self-optimizing control… Table: Binary mixture - Steady-state relative composition deviations ( )for binary column A Fixed variables T b,55% – T t,55% *0.530 T b,70% – L/F*0.916 T b,50% – L/F0.975 T b,75% - V/F*1.148 T b,90% – L*1.223 T b,70% – L/D*1.321 T b,50% – L1.386 T t,95% – V*1.470 L/D – V/B15.84 L/F – V/B18.59 L – B21.06 D – V21.22 L – V63.42 D – Binfeasible * Temperature optimally located ** Optimal temperature in opposite section.

13 13/31 E. S. Hori, Self-optimizing control… Table: Binary mixture - Steady-state relative composition deviations ( )for binary column A Fixed variables T b,55% – T t,55% *0.530 T b,70% – L/F*0.916 T b,50% – L/F0.975 T b,75% - V/F*1.148 T b,90% – L*1.223 T b,70% – L/D*1.321 T b,50% – L1.386 T t,95% – V*1.470 L/D – V/B15.84 L/F – V/B18.59 L – B21.06 D – V21.22 L – V63.42 D – Binfeasible * Temperature optimally located ** Optimal temperature in opposite section.

14 14/31 E. S. Hori, Self-optimizing control… Table: Binary mixture - Steady-state relative composition deviations ( )for binary column A Fixed variables T b,55% – T t,55% *0.530 T b,70% – L/F*0.916 T b,50% – L/F0.975 T b,75% - V/F*1.148 T b,90% – L*1.223 T b,70% – L/D*1.321 T b,50% – L1.386 T t,95% – V*1.470 L/D – V/B15.84 L/F – V/B18.59 L – B21.06 D – V21.22 L – V63.42 D – Binfeasible * Temperature optimally located ** Optimal temperature in opposite section.

15 15/31 E. S. Hori, Self-optimizing control… Table: Binary mixture - Steady-state relative composition deviations ( )for binary column A Fixed variables T b,55% – T t,55% *0.530 T b,70% – L/F*0.916 T b,50% – L/F0.975 T b,75% - V/F*1.148 T b,90% – L*1.223 T b,70% – L/D*1.321 T b,50% – L1.386 T t,95% – V*1.470 L/D – V/B15.84 L/F – V/B18.59 L – B21.06 D – V21.22 L – V63.42 D – Binfeasible * Temperature optimally located ** Optimal temperature in opposite section.

16 16/31 E. S. Hori, Self-optimizing control… Table: Binary mixture - Steady-state relative composition deviations ( )for binary column A Fixed variables T b,55% – T t,55% *0.530 T b,70% – L/F*0.916 T b,50% – L/F0.975 T b,75% - V/F*1.148 T b,90% – L*1.223 T b,70% – L/D*1.321 T b,50% – L1.386 T t,95% – V*1.470 L/D – V/B15.84 L/F – V/B18.59 L – B21.06 D – V21.22 L – V63.42 D – Binfeasible * Temperature optimally located ** Optimal temperature in opposite section.

17 17/31 E. S. Hori, Self-optimizing control… Table: Binary mixture - Steady-state relative composition deviations ( )for binary column A Fixed variables T b,55% – T t,55% *0.530 T b,70% – L/F*0.916 T b,50% – L/F0.975 T b,75% - V/F*1.148 T b,90% – L*1.223 T b,70% – L/D*1.321 T b,50% – L1.386 T t,95% – V*1.470 L/D – V/B15.84 L/F – V/B18.59 L – B21.06 D – V21.22 L – V63.42 D – Binfeasible * Temperature optimally located ** Optimal temperature in opposite section.

18 18/31 E. S. Hori, Self-optimizing control… Composition deviation: 1- L/F and one temperature 2- V/F and one temperature 3- Two temperatures symmetrically located Effect of T-location on column A Conclusion: Avoid temperature at the ends

19 19/31 E. S. Hori, Self-optimizing control… Dynamic simulation – Column A F qFqF zFzF F qFqF zFzF Conclusion: z F is the main disturbance

20 20/31 E. S. Hori, Self-optimizing control… Add composition layer on top Fixed variables T b,55% – T t,55% *0.53010.61.18 T b,70% – L/F*0.91615.22.18 T b,75% - V/F*1.14820.16.92 T b,90% – L*1.22340.12.33 T t,50% – L/F1.2561013.82 T b,70% – L/D*1.32123.11.35 T t,95% – V*1.47067.34.78 L/D – V/B15.8494.20.73 L – V63.423093.35 column A Dynamic-ISE Conclusion: For large measurement delays self- optimizing variables are best

21 21/31 E. S. Hori, Self-optimizing control… Table: Steady state data for binary distillation column examples (Skogestad et al., 1990) Column  NNFNF D/FL/F A0.51.541210.01 0.5002.70610 B0.11.541210.01 0.0922.32910 C0.51.541210.010.0020.5552.73710 D0.651.12111390.0050.100.61411.8622.9 E0.251650.00010.050.1580.22640.9 F0.5151150.0001 0.5000.22768.7 G0.51.581400.0001 0.5002.63510 H0.11.541210.010.00110.1093.31410 I0.91.541210.00110.010.8913.30510 M1*0.1-42300.001 0.0990.408- M2*0.2-37240.001 0.1990.404- M3*0.4-32170.001 0.4000.404- M4*0.6-32140.001 0.6000.386- M5*0.8-37130.001 0.8010.366- M6*0.9-32120.001 0.9010.357- * Luyben’s columns (Luyben, 2005b). These columns are simulated using ASPEN PLUS© MORE BINARY COLUMNS...

22 22/31 E. S. Hori, Self-optimizing control… Table: Binary mixtures - steady-state composition deviations. Column B Column C Column D Column E T b,55% -T t,65% 0.78T t,25% – L/F0.70T b,58% – L/D1.10T b,0% -T t,45% 0.75 T t,65% – L/F0.90T t,45% – V/F0.70T b,50% – L/F1.29T t,45% – L/F1.03 T t,65% – V/F1.04T b,75% – T t,35% 0.82T b,50% – V/F1.32T t,36% - L1.36 T t,75% - L1.12T t,50% - L0.88T b,53% - L1.45T t,36% – V/F1.58 T t,75% - V1.24T b,85% – L/D0.91T b,53% - V1.50T t,36% – V/B1.67 T t,70% – V/B1.38T t,55% - V0.93T t,78% – V/B2.04T t,36% - V1.83 T b,50% – L/F2.88T t,5% – V/B1.20T b,29% -T t,72% 2.44T b,75% – L/D4.86 T b,50% – L3.00T b,80% – L/F1.53L/D – V/B3.85T b,50% – L/F7.15 T b,25% – L/D5.48L/D – V/B2.19L/F – V/B4.48T b,50% – L8.77 L/D – V/B19.1T b,50% – L3.13L – B4.85L/D – V/B10.7 D – V19.1D – V3.41D – V5.23D – V12.4 L – B44.7L – B8.94L/D – V5.85L – V19.4 L – V71.1L – V8.94L – V56.0L – B31.9 Conclusion: L/F, L and two-point control are the best choices

23 23/31 E. S. Hori, Self-optimizing control… Table: Binary mixtures - steady-state composition deviations. Column F Column G Column H Column I T b,0% –T t,67% 0.76T b,64% -T,68% 1.24T t,35% – L/F0.87T b,30% – L/F0.93 T t,83% - L0.89T b,79% – L/F1.90T t,35% – V/F0.99T b,35% – V/F0.96 T b,75% – L/F1.03T t,93% – V/F2.07T t,40% - L1.12T b,50% – L/F0.99 T b,50% – L/F1.50T b,97% - L2.52T t,40% - V1.22T b,35% - L1.13 T b,50% – L1.64T b,77% – L/D2.60T t,30% – V/B1.43T b,50% – L1.16 T t,83% – V/F4.44T t,98% - V2.95T t,50% – L/D3.91T b,40% – V1.26 T t,83% – V5.01T b,51% – L/F3.01T b,80% -T t,5% 3.91T b,25% – L/D1.34 T t,83% – V/B7.22T b,51% – L3.39L/D – V/B10.4T b,0% –T t,75% 3.62 L/D – V/B1600T t,88% – V/B3.69D – V10.5T b,40% – V/B4.72 L/F – V/B1667L/D – V/B1593L/F – V/B17.1L/D – V/B10.3 L – B2127L – B2140L – B21.0L – B10.5 D – V2127D – V2141T b,50% – L34.9D – V21.0 L – V2683L – V6344L – V46.2L – V53.8 Conclusion: L/F, L and two-point control are the best choices

24 24/31 E. S. Hori, Self-optimizing control… Table: Binary mixtures (Luyben 2005): steady-state composition deviations. 87.5T b,48% – L434T b,59% – L/D $ 105T t,53 – L/D76.2T b,48% – L/F186T b,48% – L 15.3T b,81% – V/B*75.1T b,65% – L/F**150T b,48% – L/F 14.1T b,69% - V*24.2T t,15% – V/B*33.2T t,50% – L/D* $ 9.72T b,50 – L/D*23.3T t,85% – L/D*11.4T t,8% – V/B* 8.99T b,69% – V/F*20.4T t,54% - V*9.74T t,8% - V* 7.16T b,50% - L*18.0T t,23% – V/F*8.41T t,8% – V/F* 4.85T b,50% – L/F $ 9.25T t,23% - L*4.84T t,17% - L* 4.67T b,19% – L/F*8.67T t,46% – L/F $ 4.55T t,50% – L/F $ 2.94T b,50% -T t,53% $ 8.61T t,23% – L/F*4.07T t,17% – L/F* 1.45T b,19% -T t,27% *1.36T b,39% –T t,23% *2.29T b,10% -T t,17% * Column M3Column M2Column M1 Conclusion: L/F, L and two-point control are the best choices

25 25/31 E. S. Hori, Self-optimizing control… Table: Binary mixtures (Luyben 2005): steady-state composition deviations. 182T t,50% – L/F32.8T b,38% – V/B 216T t,50% - L88.0T 100% – V/B19.4T b,77% - V 117T b,0% – V/B21.8T b,25% – V13.5T b,38% – V/F 8.54T b,18% - V15.4T b,25% – V/F7.72T b,8% – L/D 8.03T b,0% - V/F5.62T b,50% – L6.76T b,46% – L 3.35T b,45% – L5.62T b,33% - L6.76T b,23% - L 3.27T b,9% – L/D5.13T b,8% – L/D4.71T b,46% – L/F $ 3.21T b,9% - L3.85T b,50% – L/F $ 4.67T b,15% – L/F 2.12T b,45% – L/F $ 3.85T b,25% – L/F1.54T b,46% –T t,56% $ 1.62T b,18% -T t,30% 0.96T b,25% -T t,29% 1.19T b,23% –T t,22% Column M6Column M5Column M4 Conclusion: L/F, L and two-point control are the best choices

26 26/31 E. S. Hori, Self-optimizing control… Outline 1.Introduction. Indirect composition control 2.Alternative approaches for selecting controlled variables 3.Temperature profile heuristic 4. Self-optimizing control: Exact local method 4.1 Results for binary distillation columns 4.2 Results for multicomponent distillation columns 5. Conclusion

27 27/31 E. S. Hori, Self-optimizing control… Multicomponent columns Four components: A (lightest), B, C, and D (heaviest) Equal relative volatilities (  AB =  BC =  CD =1.5) The temperatures are adjusted to be compatible with relative volatility Feed composition: 25% of each component

28 28/31 E. S. Hori, Self-optimizing control… Multicomponent columns Table: Multicomponent column data. Key components (L/H)NNFNF D/FL/F A/B41210.010.00330.2502.767 B/C41210.005 0.5001.659 C/D41210.00330.010.7502.543 “Real” B/C split: C5/nC6*45150.005 0.3441.185 *Feed composition: nC4/nC5/nC6/nC7 (25% each)

29 29/31 E. S. Hori, Self-optimizing control… Table: Multicomponent Column: steady-state composition deviations. Conclusion: L/F and L are the best choices

30 30/31 E. S. Hori, Self-optimizing control… 5. Conclusions Optimal temperature location: most sensitive stage (maximize scaled steady-state gain) Avoid temperature close to column end (especially for high purity) due to implementation errors and low sensitivity Avoid stage with small temperature slope: For dynamic reasons Binary and multicomponent separations: good control structure is L and a single temperature (usually in bottom section) Two-point temperature control: good for cases with ”binary” separations and no pinch

Download ppt "1/31 E. S. Hori, Self-optimizing control… Self-optimizing control configurations for two-product distillation columns Eduardo Shigueo Hori, Sigurd Skogestad."

Similar presentations

Implementation of MPC in a deethanizer at the Kårstø Gas plant

Implementation of MPC in a deethanizer at the Kårstø Gas plant
Distillation: So simple and yet so complex... and vice versa Sigurd Skogestad Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) Trondheim, Norway.

Distillation: So simple and yet so complex... and vice versa Sigurd Skogestad Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) Trondheim, Norway.
Ramprasad Yelchuru, Optimal controlled variable selection for Individual process units, 1 Optimal controlled variable selection for individual process.

Ramprasad Yelchuru, Optimal controlled variable selection for Individual process units, 1 Optimal controlled variable selection for individual process.
1 Name, title of the presentation Master project: Control structure design for a sequence of distillation columns Tor Anders Marvik Supervisor: Sigurd.

1 Name, title of the presentation Master project: Control structure design for a sequence of distillation columns Tor Anders Marvik Supervisor: Sigurd.
distillation column control

distillation column control
Dynamic modeling, optimization and control of a CO 2 stripper Marie Solvik Supervisors : Sigurd Skogestad and Marius Støre Govatsmark.

Dynamic modeling, optimization and control of a CO 2 stripper Marie Solvik Supervisors : Sigurd Skogestad and Marius Støre Govatsmark.
1 INTERACTION OF PROCESS DESIGN AND CONTROL Ref: Seider, Seader and Lewin (2004), Chapter 20.

1 INTERACTION OF PROCESS DESIGN AND CONTROL Ref: Seider, Seader and Lewin (2004), Chapter 20.
Self-Optimizing Control of the HDA Process Outline of the presentation –Process description. –Self-optimizing control procedure. –Self-optimizing control.

Self-Optimizing Control of the HDA Process Outline of the presentation –Process description. –Self-optimizing control procedure. –Self-optimizing control.
San Francisco Refinery, Rodeo

San Francisco Refinery, Rodeo
Plant-wide Control for Economic Operation of a Recycle Process

Plant-wide Control for Economic Operation of a Recycle Process
1 CONTROLLED VARIABLE AND MEASUREMENT SELECTION Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)

1 CONTROLLED VARIABLE AND MEASUREMENT SELECTION Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)
Multi-component Distillation Prepared by Dr

Multi-component Distillation Prepared by Dr
Concentrator case SIGURD’S RULES FOR CV1-SELECTION 1.Always control active constraints! (almost always) 2.Purity constraint on expensive product always.

Concentrator case SIGURD’S RULES FOR CV1-SELECTION 1.Always control active constraints! (almost always) 2.Purity constraint on expensive product always.
Plantwide process control with focus on selecting economic controlled variables («self- optimizing control») Sigurd Skogestad, NTNU 2014.

Plantwide process control with focus on selecting economic controlled variables («self- optimizing control») Sigurd Skogestad, NTNU 2014.
GHGT-8 Self-Optimizing and Control Structure Design for a CO 2 Capturing Plant Mehdi Panahi, Mehdi Karimi, Sigurd Skogestad, Magne Hillestad, Hallvard.

GHGT-8 Self-Optimizing and Control Structure Design for a CO 2 Capturing Plant Mehdi Panahi, Mehdi Karimi, Sigurd Skogestad, Magne Hillestad, Hallvard.
1 Active constraint regions for optimal operation of a simple LNG process Magnus G. Jacobsen and Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering NTNU.

1 Active constraint regions for optimal operation of a simple LNG process Magnus G. Jacobsen and Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering NTNU.
Optimal operation of distillation columns and link to control Distillation Course Berlin Summer 2005. Sigurd Skogestad. Part 3.

Optimal operation of distillation columns and link to control Distillation Course Berlin Summer Sigurd Skogestad. Part 3.
1 Coordinator MPC for maximization of plant throughput Elvira Marie B. Aske* &, Stig Strand & and Sigurd Skogestad* * Department of Chemical Engineering,

1 Coordinator MPC for maximization of plant throughput Elvira Marie B. Aske* &, Stig Strand & and Sigurd Skogestad* * Department of Chemical Engineering,
Rigorous Simulation of Divided-wall Columns

Rigorous Simulation of Divided-wall Columns
1 Modelling, Operation and Control of an LNG Plant Jens Strandberg & Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering, Norwegian University of Science.

1 Modelling, Operation and Control of an LNG Plant Jens Strandberg & Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering, Norwegian University of Science.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google