Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBarrie Brice Richardson Modified over 9 years ago
1
Flatford Swamp Hydrologic Restoration Feasibility Study (H089)
4
How much excess water? How to remove it from the swamp? What to do with it once the flow is removed?
8
To Mosaic To Manatee County
9
To Mosaic
10
Supply Timing and Delivery Storage Options Water Quality and Treatment Options
11
Site B Site A Flatford Swamp
12
Simplified Reservoir Routing Model Daily Inflows, Rainfall and PET o Provided by Interflow, LLC, 2011 o Existing Landuse Conditions o Used Extended Period of Record (16 years) Model Currently Includes All Parameters Except Seepage o May Include It Later with Refined Siting Information Outputs are Daily, Monthly and Annual
14
Variability of Inflows and Delivery Limits Water Quality and Treatment Requirements Storage Type and Design Criteria Operational Considerations
15
Alternative 1: No Storage Alternative 2: Excavated Storage Alternative 3: Elevated Storage All Accomplish Flatford Swamp Diversion Objectives per MRWI Conceptual Plan All Evaluations Use 20 cfs Limit on Flows Delivered to Mosaic
20
Water Quality and Treatment
21
Surface Water Sources Coker Creek Ogleby Creek Maple Creek Myakka River
22
Period of Record (1990s to 2011) Recent SWFWMD Data (2009 to 2011) Samples collected quarterly Seasonal Variability Evaluation (2008, FDEP Data) Tributaries to Myakka River Samples collected monthly
25
Myakka River Has Better Overall Water Quality Than Tributaries 2008 FDEP Water Quality Data Sulfates, conductivity readings– higher in dry season TOC concentration – lower in dry season May Develop Water Quality Indicator Based on USGS Conductivity Values Treatment Technology Exists to Accommodate Seasonal Water Quality Variability
26
Phosphate Beneficiation Process is Affected by Elevated Levels of Calcium and Magnesium
27
Alternative Refinements and Costs Regulatory Review Final Report Due December 2012
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.