Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Academic Jobs in a Nutshell Borrows heavily from Tom Wenisch’s “Job Talk” Talk Nate Derbinsky 10 January 2012.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Academic Jobs in a Nutshell Borrows heavily from Tom Wenisch’s “Job Talk” Talk Nate Derbinsky 10 January 2012."— Presentation transcript:

1 Academic Jobs in a Nutshell Borrows heavily from Tom Wenisch’s “Job Talk” Talk Nate Derbinsky 10 January 2012

2 Outline 1.Factors for Consideration 2.Types of Institutions 3.Types of Jobs 4.Application Materials

3 1. Factors Autonomy Salary Resources Responsibilities Performance Evaluation Timeline/Process Prospects Comparison to Industry/Gov’t

4 Autonomy Degree of supervision – Do you have a boss? Tenure – Freedom to pursue your curiosities (subject to grants/centers, departmental initiatives, …)

5 Salary Sponsored/Soft money – Ongoing: you need to secure moneys to pay your salary Non-Sponsored/General fund – Your salary is “reliable” and guaranteed through some process/fund external to your fund-raising efforts Absolute amount + potential for growth 9-month vs. 12-month

6 Resources Graduate students – Think about your life right now: these are the folks who do all the work Collaborators – Intra/Inter-departmental Administrative staff – Everyday, special projects (e.g. conferences), admissions, budgeting, etc. Teaching assistance – Lecturers, GSI/IA, feedback (e.g. CRLT) Institutional funding opportunities Computational/equipment (e.g. cluster computing)

7 Responsibilities Teaching – Comfort zone vs. not, new vs. old, service Research – Grad vs. undergrad, self-promotion, raising $$ Service – Committees, advising, research community (e.g. run a conference, review), leadership Mentoring – Grad vs. undergrad, placement Workload – Does the work ever end?

8 Performance Evaluation Research – Publications (venues), “impact” (e.g. h-index), student progress/placement, letters (student, research community), bringing in $$, career award Teaching – Student evaluations, student letters, innovation/publications Service – “Take one for the team,” outreach, balancing T/R

9 Timeline/Process Typical – 3 + 3 (+1) – Startup package various colors of $$ (equipment, students, summer salary) teaching Variables/Issues – Retention rate – Clarity of expectations Who is deciding (esp. relevant for co-appointment) What are the baselines

10 Prospects Basics – Title: assistant, associate, full, endowed chair – Base-salary increase – Tenure (usually with associate) – Sabbatical (4/7 years, ½ + ½ pay) Tech transfer/spinoff Administration Program manager

11 Comparison to Industry/Gov’t Autonomy: > (e.g. 6.1 vs. 6.2-3) Salary: < Resources: <> (e.g. students, equipment/data) Responsibilities: <> (e.g. teaching, funding) – Hours: worse (e.g. >80 hours/week), never-ending But you are in “control”

12 2. Types of Institutions Teaching/Liberal Arts (T1) – Oberlin, Harvey Mudd, Swarthmore Comprehensive – Eastern/Western * Research (R1) – Stanford, Berkeley, MIT, CMU – Brown, Yale, Princeton, Harvard

13 Institutional Factors Degree offerings (BS, MS, PhD) – Location of program (e.g. Math, Engineering, Business), own department? Student population – Balance of undergrad vs. grad School location Professional schools (e.g. Med) Teaching load

14 Rough Categorization T1 BS (maybe MS) Small student pop. (1000’s) More rural No professional degrees 3-4 courses per semester R1 BS, MS, PhD Large student pop. (10k’s) More urban Mix of professional degrees 0-2 courses per semester – Buyout!

15 3. Types of Jobs Post Doc Research Scientist/Professor Lecturer/Teaching-Professor Tenure-Track Professor

16 Post Doc Temporary employment (1-3 years) – Usually research, maybe teaching Typically working for a faculty member – Possibly independent funding (e.g. fellowship) – Common to get position via “who you know” Sources: academic, gov’t labs (e.g. AFRL, NRL) Goals – Avoid the real world (travel!) – Better preparation for the job search Letters, experience/CV, job-market conditions Make progress, distinguish from thesis/advisor

17 Research Scientist/Professor Research only, soft money Variable autonomy Rarely tenure track

18 Lecturer/Teaching Professor Teaching only (renewable appointments) – Some intermittent hires ~ enrollment Evaluated on teaching – High loads, lots of intro/service courses Rarely tenure-track

19 Tenure-Track Professor Autonomous from day-1 – Must become a… R1: World-class researcher & competent teacher – Bring in $$, produce high-impact research, and place students T1: Innovative teacher & competent researcher – Teach lots of courses very well, and place students

20 Transitions Post Doc -> * Academia -> Industry – Harder in reverse R1 -> T1 (not easy) – Harder in reverse Industry -> T1 (not easy) – Maybe via Community College

21 4. Application Materials Cover Letter CV Teaching Statement Research Statement Letters (3-5)

22 Cover Letter (~1 day, 1 page) Intended position Summary of packet, relative to position Opportunity to specialize to post

23 CV (~1 day) Arbitrarily long – Honors/awards – Publications – Service – Teaching Should be maintained incrementally – Have an easy-to-navigate website with links to your papers and presentations

24 Teaching Stmt. (~1-2 wks, 1-2 pgs) Experience Philosophy Interests/Qualifications – Research seminar – T1: show flexibility, more detail

25 Research Stmt (~1-4 wks, 1-4 pgs) Broad vision Dissertation work – Cite own papers Plan (5-years) – Build on strengths, expand, take some risk – T1: incorporation of undergrads

26 Letters In-depth, extensive, “coded” From… – Committee – Better: internal collaborators – Better: external collaborators (academia > industry) – Best: academic leaders in the field How… – Collaborate – Visibility: good work, good talks, good questions Conferences, invited talks, service Provide application materials at least – Keep up with deadlines, coordinate with writers

27 Process Read posts (do not be dissuaded by fields) – Fall ‘X for Fall ‘X+1 Submit materials (web, e-mail, snail) – Provide letter info (usually immediate request) Make sure recommenders submit letters Wait… – Possibly phone interview (T1?) – Onsite: 1-hour job talk, many 30-60-minute individual meetings, student meetings, dinner – Offer scheduling

28 Misc Apply widely – But not where you wouldn’t want to take the job The goal of the application packet is to get an interview Two-body problems (& solutions)


Download ppt "Academic Jobs in a Nutshell Borrows heavily from Tom Wenisch’s “Job Talk” Talk Nate Derbinsky 10 January 2012."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google