Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byElfrieda Little Modified over 9 years ago
2
“Step” “Step” n2 M-STAR! Strategic Tools for Educator Preparation This training was designed to support the training effort of all Mississippi educators to learn the M-STAR process. M-STAR is a tool for you to use as a road map to success in your classroom. Today, learn the basics of this process and prepare to use it for your professional growth. More training is coming your way, and we are excited to bring it to you.
3
Objectives of This Training To introduce the Mississippi Statewide Teacher Appraisal Rubric (M-STAR) to Mississippi teachers To help teachers acquire knowledge and understanding of M-STAR To increase teacher effectiveness To promote higher levels of achievement for all students
4
The research and data are clear! “ Teacher quality is the single most important variable impacting student achievement.” (Rivkin, Hanushek & Kain, 2005; Rockoff, 2004)
5
What do teachers want to know?
6
Why an appraisal system now? Under previous systems of evaluating teachers’ work, the scores teachers have received have become separated from the key output – student learning. Teachers have received considerably higher ratings than test results suggest should be the case. Meaningful evaluations start with a well-designed system. But ultimately the system’s success depends on strong implementation with good communication at its core.
7
What have your previous evaluations been like? Were they Consistent throughout your school and district? Completed each semester? Informative to you? Helpful in your professional growth? Grounded in best practices and research?
8
Most Important Reason for Effective Appraisals Student Achievement U.S. ranks 17th in industrialized nations in education In Mississippi, almost 50% of children in 3rd-8th grade are below grade level in language arts and math. Low graduation rates! Students not equipped with 21st-century skills! Whose job is it to improve these outcomes? All Mississippi educators!
9
Federal and State Theory of Action Improved Evaluation System Improved Educator Quality Improved Student Outcomes
10
How is M-STAR different?
11
MS Teacher Evaluation M-STAR
12
M-Star Timeline M-Star Timeline 2011-2012Pilot implemented with 20 schools in Mississippi January – July 2012Focus group review and feedback July 2012 – July 2013Statewide training on use of the system 2013-2014 Field test the M-STAR process 2014-2015 Full implementation
13
More Questions from Teachers Is my pay going to decrease? Do I have to do this? What is in it for me?
14
Observation Cycle Pre-Obs. Conf. Within 1-2 days prior to obs Obs. Post-Obs. Conference Within 1 week after ob. Follow-up Walkthrough Within 2 weeks after post-obs. conference Effective, concrete feedback + next steps are key! Observe feedback in action Key Questions: What are students learning? What is the evidence for this learning? Review lesson plan, understand context, + ask clarifying questions
15
Five Components of the Teacher Observation Cycle 1.Teacher self-assessment 2.Professional Growth Goals (PGG) and Student Learning Objectives (SLO) - MDE will have additional training in the future on these items. 3.Walk-through visits 4.Formal observations and conferences 5. Student surveys (optional)
16
M-STAR Ratings A teacher’s performance on each standard will be appraised in accordance with a four-level rating scale: Level 4 Distinguished: Indicates that the teacher’s performance consistently exceeds expectations – exemplary; cream of the crop! Level 3 Effective: Indicates that the teacher’s performance meets expectations. Learning is evident! Level 2 Emerging: Indicates that the teacher’s performance inconsistently meets expectations. PD is needed as teacher continues to learn more about the science of teaching and learning. Level 1 Unsatisfactory: Indicates that the teacher’s performance does not meet expectations. An immediate plan of improvement should be designed by the administrator and teacher.
17
Example: Summative Observation Rating DomainDomain Score WeightWeighted Rating I: Planning2.75x.20.55 II: Assessment4x.20.80 III: Instruction2.5x.20.50 IV: Learning Environment3.5x.20.70 V: Professional Responsibilities2.5x.20.50 Summative Classroom Observation Rating3.05 17 (2.75 + 4 + 2.5 + 3.5 + 2.5) = 3.05 5 SPRING SCORING
19
What does the rubric mean? The M-STAR rubric can be difficult to understand. What can I do to simplify it? It is important to fully understand the rubric!
20
M-STAR Rubric Overview Five domains (weighted equally) 1. Planning (4 standards) 2. Assessment (2 standards) 3. Instruction (5 standards) 4. Learning Environment (5 standards) 5. Professional Responsibilities (4 standards) 20 standards (placed among the 5 domains)
21
A Closer Look A Closer Look Look at your copy of the M-STAR appraisal rubric. Find Domains Locate Standards Identify the Indicators Examine Domains III and IV
22
What do best practices look like? Don’t get lost in what the standards are saying... Instead, focus on what behaviors will be seen when an effective teacher and his/her students are observed.
23
Actively engages students in the learning process Teachers will be: Using a variety of teaching strategies and resources Teaching appropriate for skill levels and different learning styles Linking content with student interests Probing and incorporating students’ questions As a facilitator, he/she is able to grasp and hold students’ attention. Using a wide range of learning skills and technology to enhance learning Within close proximity to students Exhibiting excitement and interest in lesson and students Leading a student-centered classroom Can you think of other evidence of engaging students in learning? Standard 8
24
Actively engages students in the learning process Students will be: Asking and answering questions Their questions reflect applicable understanding of content Responding to formative assessments Using technology to access, interpret, and apply information Demonstrating interest in lesson/activity Learning on their level; engaged What else will they be doing if they are truly engaged? Standard 8
25
What are artifacts? Real working documents that provide evidence of the standards Administrators will talk with you further about what artifacts are important Artifacts are not “portfolios” or decorated boxes that are time consuming to organize!!
26
Are we reaching our students? What is a 21st- century educator?
27
M-STAR Key Points Student-centered vs. teacher-centered Rubric is not a checklist but used to evaluate where a “preponderance of evidence” points on the rating scale. Conversations and FACE-TO-FACE feedback are key pieces in improving teacher practice. Stay focused on clear communication, which is transparent and professional.
28
Will it be some work? Yes... but you work hard everyday.
29
Develop Your M-STAR Cruise Plan
30
Any Questions?
31
Exit Slips
32
For More Information Contact: m-star@mde.k12.ms.us MDE Quality Professionals and Special Schools 601.359.3631
33
For More Information Check out the RCU website: www.rcu.msstate.edu Under the MDE tab, go to the M-STAR tab and find great reference items put there for you.
34
Contact Information Lois Kappler, M-STAR Coach lois.kappler@rcu.msstate.edu 662.325.3764 (w) 662.546.0066 (c) Call or text – leave a message with your information and your call will be returned.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.