Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Lecture 09 03/01/2012 Shai Avidan הבהרה: החומר המחייב הוא החומר הנלמד בכיתה ולא זה המופיע / לא מופיע במצגת.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Lecture 09 03/01/2012 Shai Avidan הבהרה: החומר המחייב הוא החומר הנלמד בכיתה ולא זה המופיע / לא מופיע במצגת."— Presentation transcript:

1 Lecture 09 03/01/2012 Shai Avidan הבהרה: החומר המחייב הוא החומר הנלמד בכיתה ולא זה המופיע / לא מופיע במצגת.

2 Today Viola Jones Face Detection: Integral Images. Gentle AdaBoost. Attentional Cascade. Many slides adapted from P. Viola

3 Integral Images

4 Fast computation with integral images The integral image computes a value at each pixel (x,y) that is the sum of the pixel values above and to the left of (x,y), inclusive This can quickly be computed in one pass through the image (x,y)

5 Computing the integral image

6 Cumulative row sum: s(x, y) = s(x–1, y) + i(x, y) Integral image: ii(x, y) = ii(x, y−1) + s(x, y) ii(x, y-1) s(x-1, y) i(x, y) MATLAB: ii = cumsum(cumsum(double(i)), 2);

7 Computing sum within a rectangle Let A,B,C,D be the values of the integral image at the corners of a rectangle Then the sum of original image values within the rectangle can be computed as: sum = A – B – C + D Only 3 additions are required for any size of rectangle! DB C A

8 Feature selection For a 24x24 detection region, the number of possible rectangle features is ~160,000!

9 Feature selection For a 24x24 detection region, the number of possible rectangle features is ~160,000! At test time, it is impractical to evaluate the entire feature set Can we create a good classifier using just a small subset of all possible features? How to select such a subset?

10 Gentle AdaBoost

11 gentleBoosting.m function classifier = gentleBoost(x, y, Nrounds) … for m = 1:Nrounds fm = selectBestWeakClassifier(x, y, w); w = w.* exp(- y.* fm); % store parameters of fm in classifier … end Solve weighted least-squares Re-weight training samples Initialize weights w = 1

12 Defines a classifier using an additive model: We need to define a family of weak classifiers Boosting Strong classifier Weak classifier Weight Features vector from a family of weak classifiers

13 Boosting Different cost functions and minimization algorithms result is various flavors of Boosting In this demo, I will use gentleBoosting: it is simple to implement and numerically stable.

14 Boosting Boosting fits the additive model by minimizing the exponential loss Training samples The exponential loss is a differentiable upper bound to the misclassification error.

15 Exponential loss -1.5-0.500.511.52 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 Squared error Exponential loss yF(x) = margin Misclassification error Loss Squared error Exponential loss

16 Boosting Sequential procedure. At each step we add For more details: Friedman, Hastie, Tibshirani. “Additive Logistic Regression: a Statistical View of Boosting” (1998) to minimize the residual loss input Desired output Parameters weak classifier

17 gentleBoosting For more details: Friedman, Hastie, Tibshirani. “Additive Logistic Regression: a Statistical View of Boosting” (1998) We chose that minimizes the cost: At each iterations we just need to solve a weighted least squares problem Weights at this iteration At each iteration: Instead of doing exact optimization, gentle Boosting minimizes a Taylor approximation of the error:

18 Weak classifiers The input is a set of weighted training samples (x,y,w) Regression stumps: simple but commonly used in object detection. Four parameters: b=E w (y [x>  ]) a=E w (y [x<  ]) x f m (x)  fitRegressionStump.m

19 Boosting for face detection First two features selected by boosting: This feature combination can yield 100% detection rate and 50% false positive rate

20 Attentional Cascade

21 Boosting for face detection A 200-feature classifier can yield 95% detection rate and a false positive rate of 1 in 14084 Not good enough! Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve

22 Attentional cascade We start with simple classifiers which reject many of the negative sub-windows while detecting almost all positive sub-windows Positive response from the first classifier triggers the evaluation of a second (more complex) classifier, and so on A negative outcome at any point leads to the immediate rejection of the sub-window FACE IMAGE SUB-WINDOW Classifier 1 T Classifier 3 T F NON-FACE T Classifier 2 T F NON-FACE F

23 Attentional cascade Chain classifiers that are progressively more complex and have lower false positive rates: vs falsenegdetermined by % False Pos % Detection 0 50 0 100 FACE IMAGE SUB-WINDOW Classifier 1 T Classifier 3 T F NON-FACE T Classifier 2 T F NON-FACE F Receiver operating characteristic

24 Attentional cascade The detection rate and the false positive rate of the cascade are found by multiplying the respective rates of the individual stages A detection rate of 0.9 and a false positive rate on the order of 10 -6 can be achieved by a 10-stage cascade if each stage has a detection rate of 0.99 (0.99 10 ≈ 0.9) and a false positive rate of about 0.30 (0.3 10 ≈ 6×10 -6 ) FACE IMAGE SUB-WINDOW Classifier 1 T Classifier 3 T F NON-FACE T Classifier 2 T F NON-FACE F

25 Training the cascade Set target detection and false positive rates for each stage Keep adding features to the current stage until its target rates have been met – Need to lower AdaBoost threshold to maximize detection (as opposed to minimizing total classification error) – Test on a validation set If the overall false positive rate is not low enough, then add another stage Use false positives from current stage as the negative training examples for the next stage

26 The implemented system Training Data – 5000 faces All frontal, rescaled to 24x24 pixels – 300 million non-faces 9500 non-face images – Faces are normalized Scale, translation Many variations – Across individuals – Illumination – Pose

27 System performance Training time: “weeks” on 466 MHz Sun workstation 38 layers, total of 6061 features Average of 10 features evaluated per window on test set “On a 700 Mhz Pentium III processor, the face detector can process a 384 by 288 pixel image in about.067 seconds” – 15 Hz – 15 times faster than previous detector of comparable accuracy (Rowley et al., 1998)

28 Output of Face Detector on Test Images

29 Other detection tasks Facial Feature Localization Male vs. female Profile Detection

30

31 Summary: Viola/Jones detector Rectangle features Integral images for fast computation Boosting for feature selection Attentional cascade for fast rejection of negative windows


Download ppt "Lecture 09 03/01/2012 Shai Avidan הבהרה: החומר המחייב הוא החומר הנלמד בכיתה ולא זה המופיע / לא מופיע במצגת."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google