Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBrianna Freeman Modified over 9 years ago
1
Preparations for the review of the Gothenburg Protocol Report to the WGSR September 2006 Markus Amann et al., EMEP Centre for Integrated Assessment Modelling (CIAM)
2
Tasks for the review Development of baseline projections for emissions –Based on national projections of (energy and agricultural) activity projections – –Compilation of input data For EU countries For non-EU countries Assessment of health and environmental impacts
3
EU countries: NEC baseline projections ( EU-25 + BUL+ROM+TK+CRO+N+CH) Series of bilateral consultations with 22 Parties in 2005 –Review of emission inventories, projections, current legislation Energy projections: –National projections from 21 countries –PRIMES scenario for €20 carbon price Agricultural projections –National projections from 17 countries –CAPRI scenario for the mid-term CAP reform Presentation in Brussels at Conference on September 29. 2006
4
NEC baseline emission projections (EU-25, National projections, relative to the 2000 levels)
6
Comparison of NEC and CAFE baseline emissions EU-25, 2020
7
Comparison of NEC and CAFE energy projections EU-25, 2020
8
CO 2 emissions of the NEC baseline projections EU-25, 2020 PRIMES €20 scenario National energy projections
9
Air pollutant emissions as a function of CO 2 mitigation (EU-25, 2020) PRIMES €20 scenario National energy projections
10
Air pollutant emissions as a function of CO 2 mitigation (EU-25, 2020)
11
Air pollution control costs for current legislation 2020 (SO 2, NO x, PM) as a function of CO 2 mitigation (EU-25, 2020) Costs of CAFE TSAP proposal
12
Input data for non-EU countries Bilateral consultations held with: –Norway, (Switzerland) –Russia, Ukraine (funded by DG- ENV) –Belarus Draft input data documented in CIAM report 1/2006 Feedbacks from national experts invited up to end of 2006 Updated projections in early 2007
13
Sources of energy projections for non-EU countries AlbaniaGothenburg Protocol 1996NorwayNational projection 2005/2006 BelarusGothenburg Protocol, adjusted 2006 RomaniaPRIMES baseline 2005 Bosnia-H.Gothenburg Protocol 1996RussiaNational projection 2002 BulgariaPRIMES baseline 2005Serbia-M.Gothenburg Protocol 1996 CroatiaGothenburg Protocol 1996SwitzerlandNational projection 2005/2006 T.F.Y.R.O. Macedonia Gothenburg Protocol 1996TurkeyPRIMES baseline 2005 Rep. of Moldova Gothenburg Protocol 1996UkraineNational projection 2004
14
Draft projections of emissions for non-EU countries (relative to the 2000 levels)
15
Further time table for the Gothenburg review December 2006: Deadline for comments on input data for non-EU countries May 2007: Draft assessment of environmental impacts presented to TFIAM August 2006: Report to the EMEP Steering Body September 2007: Report to WGSR
16
Technical potentials for further PM2.5 reductions on top of “Current legislation” in 2020 [in kt] from sources which are included in existing Protocols
17
The EU-LIFE project EC4MACS: European Consortium for Modelling of Air Pollution and Climate Strategies EU funding for a consortium of integrated assessment modelling teams to prepare and maintain modelling tools for air quality and climate policy development –IIASA (CIAM) - Coordinator –MNP/RIVM (CCE) - critical loads data –NTUA Athens – energy projections –Uni Bonn et al. – agricultural projections –LTUA Thessaloniki – transport modelling –AEAT et al. – benefit assessment –MET.NO (MSC-W) – dispersion modelling –Supported by additional contracts for JRC Ispra and Sevilla Project time frame 2007-2012 ~4.5 million € EU contribution (on co-funding basis)
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.