Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

STP: An Aerial Spray Treatment Planning System W.D. Potter, Ramyaa, J. Li Artificial Intelligence Center, GSRC 111 University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "STP: An Aerial Spray Treatment Planning System W.D. Potter, Ramyaa, J. Li Artificial Intelligence Center, GSRC 111 University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602."— Presentation transcript:

1 STP: An Aerial Spray Treatment Planning System W.D. Potter, Ramyaa, J. Li Artificial Intelligence Center, GSRC 111 University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 (Contact: potter@uga.edu or 706-542-0361)potter@uga.edu And J. Ghent, D. Twardus, H. Thistle USDA Forest Service

2 Overview of Presentation Abstract How did STP come about Goals of STP Basic architecture Heuristics Overview of STP Conclusion and future developments

3 Abstract The Spray Treatment Planner – an intelligent decision support system for aerial spray treatment. A tool to schedule spraying pesticides aerially - a capacitated vehicle router STP schedules the spraying operation of selected blocks from selected airports using single or multiple aircraft. The scheduling is done to maximize the spray efficiency and spray productivity by minimizing the total time and distance flown. It uses heuristics to obtain a near optimal solution.

4 Overview of Presentation Abstract How did STP come about Goals of STP Basic architecture Heuristics Overview of STP Conclusion and future developments

5 The gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar L.) has been one of north American’s most devastating forest pests. Application of pesticides by aircraft. Determining the production needs - guess work or heuristics from other projects. Over-estimating contract needs - larger than needed aircraft or more aircraft than needed. Under-estimating contract needs - treatment at less than optimal timing. Needs careful preparation and planning, as well as comparing different spray application strategies. A classic problem to be solved by AI techniques. How STP came about

6 Overview of Presentation Abstract How did STP come about Goals of STP Basic architecture Heuristics Overview of STP Conclusion and future developments

7 STP – a capacitated vehicle router Attempts to give an optimal schedule for sprayingoptimal Schedule is restricted by fuel and pesticide tank capacity Comparison of different schedules Gives a realistic estimate of productivity and needs Comparison of productivity of various aircraft explain Goals of STP

8 airport blocks

9 airport blocks

10 STP – a capacitated vehicle router Gives an optimal schedule for sprayingoptimal Schedule is restricted by fuel and pesticide tank capacity Comparison of different schedules Gives a realistic estimate of productivity and needs Comparison of productivity of various aircraft explain Goals of STP

11 Optimal schedule : Quantitative measures of effectiveness Spray productivity = area sprayed total aerial spray operation time Spray efficiency = time spent spraying total aerial spray operation time Total aerial = time spent + ferry spray time spraying time Optimize : ferry time ; time spent spraying

12 Overview of Presentation Abstract How did STP come about Goals of STP Basic architecture Heuristics Overview of STP Conclusion and future developments

13 The evaluation model flowchart

14 Overview of Presentation Abstract How did STP come about Goals of STP Basic architecture Heuristics Overview of STP Conclusion and future developments

15 Heuristics Minimize total flying distance Minimize time spent in a block : “Flight Advisor” for a single block“Flight Advisor” Minimize ferry time representation core of the heuristics justification implementation

16 Flight Advisor If the block = polygon of rectangles then spray along the longest side of rectangles else spray along the longest side of the polygon endif

17 Heuristics Minimize total flying distance Minimize time spent in a block : “Flight Advisor” for a single block Minimize ferry time representation core of the heuristics justification implementation

18 Representation G = {V,E} – a connected graph V = {V1-Vn} a block set E = {(Vi,Vi)} a set of flight lines Lij – length of flight line Vi-Vj Qi – load associated with Vi Minimize a linear combination of total distance traveled by different aircraft Restricted by pesticide and fuel capacity

19 Heuristics Minimize total flying distance Minimize time spent in a block : “Flight Advisor” for a single block Minimize ferry time representation core of the heuristics justification implementation

20 Case 1 (typical case): The blocks are on the same side of the airport but the airport and the blocks are not in the same line. The total saved flight distance is: D1+D2-D3. Distance saved =D1+D2-D3

21 Case 2 (worst case): The blocks are on different sides of the airport, and the airport and blocks are in one line so that the total reduced distance is 0. Nothing saved

22 Case 3 (best case): The blocks are on the same side and in the same line with respect to the airport. The total saved distance in this case is D1+D2+D3.

23 Heuristics Minimize total flying distance Minimize time spent in a block : “Flight Advisor” for a single block Minimize ferry time representation core of the heuristics justification implementation

24 The Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem is the Traveling Salesperson Problem with additional constraints of capacity Exact calculation is not possible for large inputs Basnet (1997) gives 2 heuristics and shows that heuristics give reasonably close answers to the exact ones Justification

25 Heuristics Minimize total flying distance Minimize time spent in a block : Flight Advisor” for a single block Minimize ferry time representation core of the heuristics justification implementation

26 Implementation CVRPS CVRPS -- for multiple blocks serviced by a single airport CVRPM -- multiple airports

27 Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem for Multiple Blocks Serviced by Single Airport Forms initial runs such that each run services a single block and associates runs to blocks For each run 1) try combining the closest block 2) combination successful if the capacity constraints are met for each run (new combined run) calculate the full schedule as a collection of runs and choose the best

28 Implementation CVRPS -- for multiple blocks serviced by a single airport CVRPMCVRPM -- for multiple airports

29 An extension of CVRPS using one airport as base or home airport and the rest for fueling or restocking pesticides. Works by relaxing the constraints in capacity Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem for Multiple Blocks Serviced by Single Airport

30 Overview of Presentation Abstract How did STP come about Goals of STP Basic architecture Heuristics Overview of STP Conclusion and future developments

31

32 Overview of Presentation Abstract How did STP come about Goals of STP Basic architecture Heuristics Overview of STP Conclusion and future developments

33 Conclusion & future work The spray advisor uses heuristic methods to find near optimal schedules for spraying selected blocks This project is in progress Some of the future areas of development involve 1)Considering the terrain to be sprayed 2)Considering mixed aircraft 3)Considering preferred direction of flight

34 Thanks

35 Overview of the Presentation Abstract How did STP come about Goals of STP Basic architecture Heuristics Overview of STP Conclusion and future developments


Download ppt "STP: An Aerial Spray Treatment Planning System W.D. Potter, Ramyaa, J. Li Artificial Intelligence Center, GSRC 111 University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google