1. Note Well Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft or RFC and any statement made within the context of an IETF activity is considered an "IETF Contribution". Such statements include oral statements in IETF sessions, as well as written and electronic communications made at any time or place, which are addressed to: The IETF plenary session The IESG, or any member thereof on behalf of the IESG Any IETF mailing list, including the IETF list itself, any working group or design team list, or any other list functioning under IETF auspices Any IETF working group or portion thereof The IAB or any member thereof on behalf of the IAB The RFC Editor or the Internet-Drafts function All IETF Contributions are subject to the rules of RFC 5378 and RFC 3979 (updated by RFC 4879).RFC 5378RFC 3979RFC 4879 Statements made outside of an IETF session, mailing list or other function, that are clearly not intended to be input to an IETF activity, group or function, are not IETF Contributions in the context of this notice. Please consult RFC 5378 and RFC 3979 for details.RFC 5378RFC 3979 A participant in any IETF activity is deemed to accept all IETF rules of process, as documented in Best Current Practices RFCs and IESG Statements. A participant in any IETF activity acknowledges that written, audio and video records of meetings may be made and may be available to the public.

2. MPLS Working Group IETF 84 – Vancouver Monday, 09:00-11:30 Friday, 09:00-11:00

3. Agenda Bashing - Admin Please respect the time allocated to your presentation slot. Fill in the Blue Sheets, and pass on. Return to WG Chairs https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/84/ agenda/mpls/

4. 100 The MPLS working group has now produced RFCs

5. WG Status 2 New RFCs –RFC 6639 Multiprotocol Label Switching Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) MIB-Based Management Overview –RFC 6669 An Overview of the Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Toolset for MPLS-Based Transport Networks RFC 6670 The Reasons for Selecting a Single Solution for MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS- TP) Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM)) RFC 6670 was not a working group document, but may be of interest and has been made accessible from the MPLS WG home page.

6. WG Status WG Drafts in RFC-Editor’s queue –draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-gtsm (EDIT) Document of interest in RFC-Editors queue –draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-04 (Waiting for ITU-T reference)

7. WG Status Drafts in IESG Processing –draft-ietf-mpls-tp-use-cases-and-design-02 Publication Requested –draft-ietf-mpls-tp-security-framework-04 Publication Requested

8. WG Status WG Drafts (on the agenda) –draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-multi-topology –draft-ietf-mpls-tp-ring-protection Discussion of deep label stacks –Resulted from WG last call on draft-ietf-mpls-entropy- label

9. WG Status WG Drafts (not on the agenda) I –draft-ietf-mpls-entropy-label Shepherd write-up in progress –draft-ietf-mpls-gach-adv WG Last call closed Waiting for update from authors –draft-ietf-mpls-ipv6-pw-lsp-ping Ready for WG Last Call –draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-dod Security section need to be improved Minor updates needed Authors expect to request WG Last Call before IETF 85 –draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ip-pw-capability –draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6 WG Last Call closed Waiting for updates from the authors

10. WG Status WG Drafts (not on the agenda) II –draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-mpls-tp-oam-conf Waiting for updated version of CCAMP companion document –draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-ttl-tlv –draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-in-band-signaling Ready for IESG –draft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping WG Last Call closed Waiting for updates from the authors –draft-ietf-mpls-seamless-mcast –draft-ietf-mpls-seamless-mpls

11. WG Status WG Drafts (not on the agenda) III –draft-ietf-mpls-targeted-mldp Recently adopted as WG document, to be published –draft-ietf-mpls-tp-ethernet-addressing WG Last Call closed Waiting for updates from authors –draft-ietf-mpls-tp-itu-t-identifiers WG Last Call extended –draft-ietf-mpls-tp-mip-mep-map Working on one outstanding issue –draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-id-mib Recently adopted as WG document –draft-ietf-mpls-tp-rosetta-stone Need some work

12. WG Status WG Drafts (not on the agenda) IV –draft-ietf-mpls-tp-security-framework Publication Requested –draft-ietf-mpls-tp-te-mib WG Last Call closed New version (-04) published Waiting for MiB Doctors to confirm the updates –draft-ietf-mpls-tp-temporal-hitless-psm Updated. New requirements incorporated –draft-ietf-mpls-tp-use-cases-and-design Publication Requested

13. Liaison Needed to answer to: Revision of Recommendation ITU-T G.8131 – Linear protection switching for MPLS-TP networks https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1162/ Eric O and Yaacov W has helped the WG chairs to compile a response based on comments from several sources This proposed response has been reviewed on the WG mailing list. Some late comments need to be responded to or worked into the text. The response liaison will be sent this week

14. WG Status Non WG Drafts I –draft-ali-mpls-inter-domain-p2mp-rsvp-te-lsp In review prior to wg doc poll IPR call will be issued –draft-allan-mpls-spme-smp-fmwk –draft-allan-mpls-unified-ic-req-frmwk –draft-atlas-mpls-te-express-path –draft-bashandy-mpls-ldp-bgp-frr MPLS or RTWGP? –draft-chen-mpls-mldp-deployment-via-p2p-tunnels

15. WG Status Non WG Drafts II –draft-chen-mpls-p2mp-egress-protection On the agenda –draft-chen-mpls-p2mp-ingress-protection On the agenda –draft-cheung-mpls-tp-mesh-protection On hold until we have the SMP requirements –draft-cui-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi-id –draft-cui-mpls-tp-on-demand-cv-id –draft-ezy-mpls-tp-1ton-protection Poll for adoption as working group document ends August 3rd –draft-fbb-mpls-tp-p2mp-framework New version published Comments requested

16. WG Status Non WG Drafts III –draft-fuxh-mpls-delay-loss-te-framework On the agenda –draft-helvoort-mpls-tp-ring-protection-switching –draft-hmk-mpls-tp-p2mp-oam-framework On the agenda –draft-iwijnand-mpls-mldp-multi-topology –draft-jacquenet-mpls-rd-p2mp-te-requirements –draft-jin-jounay-mpls-mldp-hsmp Being reviewed prior to call for adoption as working group document –draft-jin-mpls-mldp-leaf-discovery Being reviewed prior to call for adoption as working group document

17. WG Status Non WG Drafts IV –draft-jjb-mpls-rsvp-te-hsmp-lsp Being reviewed prior to call for adoption as working group document –draft-kini-mpls-frr-ldp RTGWG? –draft-kompella-mpls-reserved-labels –draft-li-mpls-ldp-mt-mib –draft-liu-mpls-tp-interconnected-ring-protection –draft-liu-mpls-tp-p2mp-shared-protection –draft-lzj-mpls-receiver-driven-multicast-rsvp-te On the agenda

18. WG Status Non WG Drafts V –draft-manral-mpls-rsvpte-ipv6 –draft-manral-mpls-tp-lmp-test –draft-martinotti-mpls-unified-mpls-fwk Comments needed. –draft-mirsky-mpls-tp-cv-adv To be updated Call for wg adoption prior to IETF 85 –draft-pan-shared-mesh-protection On hold waiting for SMP requirements –draft-pdutta-mpls-ldp-adj-capability On the agenda –draft-pdutta-mpls-ldp-v2

19. WG Status Non WG Drafts VI –draft-pdutta-mpls-multi-ldp-instance On the agenda –draft-pdutta-mpls-tldp-hello-reduce MPLS-RT review –draft-pelletier-mpls-ldp-bindings-refresh –draft-raza-mpls-ldp-applicability-label-adv Poll to become wg document ends Aug 7th –draft-raza-mpls-ldp-olf –draft-rekhter-mpls-pim-sm-over-mldp –draft-shen-mpls-rsvp-setup-protection

20. WG Status Non WG Drafts VII –draft-smiler-mpls-tp-linear-protection-mib –draft-tao-mpls-pim-interworking On the agenda –draft-torvi-mpls-rsvp-ingress-protection On the agenda –draft-villamizar-mpls-tp-multipath –draft-villamizar-mpls-tp-multipath-te-extn –draft-weingarten-mpls-smp-requirements On the agenda –draft-wijnands-mpls-mldp-node-protection Ready for poll to become wg doc

21. WG Status Non WG Drafts VIII –draft-xu-mpls-in-udp –draft-zhao-mpls-mldp-protections –draft-zheng-mpls-ldp-hello-crypto-auth Poll for wg adoption ends July 31st –draft-zjns-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply On the agenda –draft-zlj-mpls-mrsvp-te-frr On the agenda RTGWG?

22. The MPLS-RT Information –We have a lot of WG drafts, and a lot more drafts waiting to be considered for adoption as WG drafts –To work through the backlog while maintaining quality, WG chairs started an MPLS Review Team Status –MPLS-RT was initially an experiment –WG chairs found it very helpful and have decided to make it permanent. –Members chosen for experience and knowledge, some are specialists in certain areas.

23. The MPLS Review Team (MPLS-RT) MPLS-RT Charter review drafts to support the working group chairs, e.g. before polls on working group document status Respond to the following questions: –is document coherent? –is it useful? –is it likely to be actually useful in operational networks? –is technically sound? –is ready to be considered for WG adoption? The working group chairs may request reviews in other situations

24. The MPLS-RT process RT members have indicated specific areas of competence and interest Chairs request reviews by specific RT members –Others (not on the team) may be asked to review some documents due to specific expertise Reviews sent to authors, MPLS list –May be sent privately to chairs only –This is a new process, we have not fully debugged all details

25. The MPLS-RT members Dave Allan Thomas Beckhaus Mach Chen Joan Cucchiara Nick DelRegno Kenji Fujihira Eric Gray Jia He Lizhong Jin Markus Jork Daniel King Sriganesh Kiri Nick Leymann Greg Mirsky Thomas Morin Tom Nadeau Eric Osborne Kamran Raza Raveendra Torvi Yaacov Weingarten Bert Wijnen Jeremy Whittaker Bo Wu Vero Zheng

26. Miscellaneous for Authors Please Verify email addresses in drafts. –We quite often get bounces from the mail aliases for our drafts Question: “Why do not all ‘mpls’ related drafts show up on the mpls WG page?” The rule is that the filename shall be in this format: –draft-ietf-mpls-whatever-topic (if and only if WG document); or –draft-individual-mpls-whatever-topic (otherwise) Constructs that will not work: –draft-individual1-indivdual2-mpls-topic; –draft-individual-my-mpls-draft They are not “illegal”, but they will not show up on the mpls page!