1. MSD Total Supplier Performance and Inventory Control Keleigh Bicknell, William Darlington, Alex Resnick, Brian Woodard

2. Overview Subsystem Level Design Review Goals Updated Risk Analysis Expert Feedback / Opportunities Current State Analysis SKU Rationalization Prototype Testing Plan Prototype Discussion

3. SubSystem Level Design Review Goals During the subsystem level design phase the team plans to continue developing prototypes of the purchasing and tool loan out software. Web space on the RIT web server will be requested to begin creation of a MSD specific website. Time studies will be performed to document the current state and identify additional areas for improvement. A testing plan will be created to document how the team will receive feedback on the current prototypes.

4. Updated Risk Analysis Likelihood of Occurrence Reduced Benchmarking risk – reduced to 0 Unable to obtain web space – reduced to 0 Newest Concerns Capturing accurate current state data Quantity of surplus materials

5. Expert Feedback / Opportunities Contacted McMaster- Carr: Do not offer Contacted Grainger: Setting up meeting for next week to discuss Contacted Supply Point: Waiting on Response

6. Current State Analysis Began collecting data to document the current state Benchmarked the current purchasing procedure by creating a “ mock ” purchase requisition and timing the steps Observed tool loan out activity from 12-2PM on Thursday, Oct 15. Tool Loan Out observation: Need more data, may leave a form with the staff to have them record transactions Purchasing observation: Guide approval times vary – send survey to MSD II students to get more accurate data

7. Current State Analysis

8. Current State Analysis: MSD II Survey The following survey will be sent to MSD II students to receive feedback regarding the guide approval process. We also hope to better understand what teams utilize the consumable inventory on the MSD floor and in the machine shop.

9. SKU Rationalization

10. Prototype Testing Plan

11. Prototype Discussion Walk through Purchasing prototype Walk through budget tracking prototype Walk through tool loan out prototype *A general screen shot of the prototype can be found on the team ’ s Edge website. Each prototype will be pulled up and walked through during the review. http://edge.rit.edu/edge/P16701/public/Subsystem%20Designhttp://edge.rit.edu/edge/P16701/public/Subsystem%20Design

12. Questions?

13. Appendix

14. Problem Statement

15. Customer Requirements

16. Engineering Metrics

17. Benchmarking

18. Purchasing Functional Decomposition Top Level Functions

19. Inventory Functional Decomposition

20. Purchasing Functional Decomposition

21. System Architecture

22. Morphological Chart

23. Concept Development Five design concepts were generated through use of the morphological chart. The concept development matrix highlights the primary functions of the system and the design option for each concept displayed on the left.

24. Concept Selection

25. Feasibility: Purchasing - Web Based Form

26. Feasibility: Purchasing - Adding a Vendor 1 2 3

27. Feasibility: Purchasing - Active Request Tracking

28. Feasibility: Purchasing Support Tool

29. Purchasing Process Map

30. Feasibility: Tool Loan Out 1 2 3

31. Tool Loan Out Process Map

32. Feasibility: Scheduling 1 2 3

33. Scheduling Process Map

34. Risks Coding becomes overly complicated -Prevent by properly benchmarking and following best practices Student injury while unsupervised -Removed from scope, risk has been prevented Card Swipe vs Barcode -Reduce failure rate by researching options