Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Supply Response in the EU as a Result of CAP Reform What have we learned? ERS Modeling Workshop New Challenges in Modeling EU Agriculture and Agricultural.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Supply Response in the EU as a Result of CAP Reform What have we learned? ERS Modeling Workshop New Challenges in Modeling EU Agriculture and Agricultural."— Presentation transcript:

1 Supply Response in the EU as a Result of CAP Reform What have we learned? ERS Modeling Workshop New Challenges in Modeling EU Agriculture and Agricultural Policy 16 November 2001

2  Review the work we have already done. What are our future concerns? Do we need better data (i.e. elasticities) and/or better specifications for production?  Should the impacts of non-price factors such as technological change have a greater role in our models?  Are the impacts of blue and green box payments on production important enough that we should be thinking on how to better specify these in our models?

3 Leetmaa, Bernstein, An Analysis of Agenda 2000, ERS-ESIM model  EU grain production increases above a scenario continuing 1992 reforms due to decrease in the set-aside requirement. However, grain yields are lower than projections due to the cut in the intervention price.  Growing wheat in the EU is more profitable than growing other grains, shifting some acreage out of coarse grains and oilseeds and into wheat.  The reduction in EU oilseed payments would initially cause a slight shift out of oilseed production into wheat production. However, oilseed production would be slightly higher than projections due to the decreased set-aside.  Production of other coarse grains (mostly rye and oats) exceed projection estimates also due to the decreased set-aside.  Milk production will increase 1.2 percent a year due to the increase in the dairy quota with another 1.2 increase from 2005 to 2007.  Due to lower feed costs and increases in the dairy quota and direct payments, beef production will decline only slightly, as 78 percent of EU beef is a byproduct of the dairy herd.

4 Changes from baseline results (i.e. continuation of 1992 reforms) in 2005

5 Supply Response Concerns with the ERS ESIM Model  Do we expect any changes in yield or production elasticities as a result of CAP reform?  How much of a supply response will there be (i.e. towards grains and away from oilseeds) as the intervention price falls below the world price for wheat and barley?  Are there pressures for the EU to lower the set-aside rate to increase exports of wheat and barley?  Beef production has always been a concern in our ESIM model-where the majority of production (78%) is essentially fixed by headage payments and other constant factors. Is this an accurate specification?  Is production of poultry and pigmeat less responsive to prices as a result of the combined increase payments to beef producers and the BSE/FMD crises in the EU?  How much weight should be given to so-called “other factors” (non-price, non- cost factors) in our production function?

6 Questions for Discussion  What have been the main impacts of CAP reform (MacSherry or Agenda 2000) on supply/production in the EU?  What reform policies have been “successfully” modeled and what policies have been more difficult to model (e.g. blue-box policies)?  Have production or yield elasticities changed in our models as a result of MacSherry or Agenda 2000 reforms?  Has CAP reform changed land allocation decisions in the EU?  How has CAP reform changed supply response compared to other domestic or trade policies, eastward enlargement scenarios, and structural changes in EU agriculture?  Can we make any predictions as to what the long-term effects of CAP reform to be on EU production?

7 Anania, Modeling the GATT Agreement on Agriculture: Assessing the compatibility of EU Agenda 2000 with GATT commitments for wheat, CAMINIA model  Uses the CAMINIA model, a mathematical programming spatial partial equilibrium model which explicitly specifies many trade policies.  Runs two scenarios for each of the years 2001, 2002, and 2005-one scenario represents the continuation of MacSherry reforms and the other one represents Agenda 2000 reforms.  Wheat production decreases by 0.8% between the base and Agenda 2000 reforms in 2001 (assuming a 10% set-aside). Wheat production decreases by 3.4% and 2.5% between the 2002 and 2005 base and Agenda 2000 scenarios, respectively.  In the scenarios, the EU domestic price of wheat falls to such an extent that EU exports are competitive on the world market without subsidies.

8 Weyerbrock, East-West European Integration: A General Equilibrium Analysis of Alternative Agricultural Policies, Robinson- type CGE model  Runs three different scenarios-Agenda 2000, Eastern enlargement, and a combination of Agenda 2000 and enlargement. The base scenario is a continuation of 1992 reforms. In the Agenda 2000 scenarios, set-aside is set to zero.  Total agricultural output shrinks in the EU by 2.3% as a result of Agenda 2000 as there is a move from rural to urban sectors. Output shrinks by 2.38% as a result of a combination of Agenda 2000 and enlargement. The largest declines occur in meat (around 6.2%), wheat (4.5-5.5%), other grains (3.9- 4.6%), and oils (around 4.4%).

9 Moro, Sckokai, Modeling the CAP Arable Crop Regime in Italy: Degree of Decoupling and Impact of Agenda 2000, Normalized quadratic profit function  CAP reform tools are not neutral towards crop production. Crop-specific aids, the set-aside obligation, and related payments do affect crop supply, mainly through land allocation decisions.  The impact of reform depends crucially on the differential treatment for maize.  The Agenda 2000 package is biased in favor of cereal production (esp. wheat) and against oilseeds, with also a tendency towards more extensive agricultural practices.  The Agenda 2000 package is far from being decoupled. In fact, the size of the production effect from the Agenda 2000 package is much larger than under the MacSherry package  This study was for only for a sample of producers specializing in crop production in the North of Italy.


Download ppt "Supply Response in the EU as a Result of CAP Reform What have we learned? ERS Modeling Workshop New Challenges in Modeling EU Agriculture and Agricultural."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google