1. Towards a Typology of Internet Governance Socio-technical Arrangements Internet Governance : Transparency, Trust and Tools Paris, June 12th, 2009 Romain Badouard Francesca Musiani Cécile Méadel Laurence Monnoyer-Smith

2. Socio-technical Arrangements Internet Governance Multistakeholderism Openness Technical Standards Critical Resources Normative procedures Introduction ICANN FDI IGF AFNIC W3C IETF ENISA

3.  Theory of Reflexive governance (Habermas, Beck) Theoretical framework Democratic Legitimacy Role of Civil Society  Challenges in reflexive governance (Dedeurwaerdere) Emergence of cooperative structures Compromises between new and old forms of governance  Reflections on common goods (Delmas-Marty)

4.  The study and the objectives of the IG3T workshop series  The aim of the study The study of production of norms and standards in order to determine innovative coordination principles The specificities of IG arrangements vis-à-vis more traditional forms of governance Development of a methodological tool for research Proposal of ideal-types of procedural behaviour

5.  A process of dynamic co-construction between procedures and outcomes takes place  Reflexivity influences the establishment of new kinds of procedure  There is a link between openness, inclusiveness, and normative processes Hypotheses

6.  Actor/procedure W3CIETFAFNICICANNFDIIGFENISA  Three key moments Integration : a certain number of actors gather around a particular IG- related issue Normative Process : the format of the procedure is chosen and the norm produced Assessment : the norm becomes operational and the procedure is assessed Method

7.  The codification of procedural criteria Past works on codification : mostly of discourses Attribution of numerical values Organization in scales Construction of axes and graphs

9. Integration

10. Normative Process

11. Assessment

12. Overall levels of performance

13. Towards a Typology  The expert type  The open type(s)  The hybrid type Weak integration, collective work among involved actors, strong link between production and decision High level of integration translating into the following stages more or less effectively Good integration level but restrictive modalities of implication, possibility for feedback but no formal consideration guaranteed

14. Concluding Remarks  Involvement of a wide variety of actors ; importance of consensus-seeking  Reflexivity : relevant criterion to assess the link between norm and procedure  Observation in our three types of a reciprocal and interactive construction of norm and procedure