1. NSTX XP818: ELM mitigation w/midplane coils - SAS S. A. Sabbagh, J-K. Park, T. Evans, S. Gerhardt, R. Maingi, J.E. Menard, many others… (joint ELM mitigation team) XP818: ELM Mitigation with Midplane Control Coils Supported by Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT Nova Photonics NYU ORNL PPPL PSI SNL UC Davis UC Irvine UCLA UCSD U Maryland U New Mexico U Rochester U Washington U Wisconsin Culham Sci Ctr Hiroshima U HIST Kyushu Tokai U Niigata U Tsukuba U U Tokyo JAERI Ioffe Inst TRINITI KBSI KAIST ENEA, Frascati CEA, Cadarache IPP, Jülich IPP, Garching U Quebec NSTX Team Review February 19, 2008 Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory V1.3

2. NSTX XP818: ELM mitigation w/midplane coils - SAS Exploratory approach to finding ELM mitigation solution with midplane non-axisymmetric coils Goal  Demonstration of ELM mitigation with NSTX midplane RWM coil set Approach  Target development (i) low q 95 8  Application of DC fields (broader n spectrum, new 2008 capabilities) Past odd parity fields (n = 3, 1+3) operating on low q 95 target New even parity field (n = 2 (strong n = 4), 6) capability for 2008 New combined odd/even parity (present favorite n = 2 + 3)  Application of AC fields Using either/both odd and even parity fields; co/ctr propagation  ELM mitigation through effects on edge plasma profiles Feedback on n = 1  May be useful for giant ELMs, buildup detected by RWM B r sensors  Repeat techniques showing most potential in low recycling (post-LITER)

3. NSTX XP818: ELM mitigation w/midplane coils - SAS New non-axisymmetric field capability allows new combinations for ELM mitigation n = 2+3 field can produce Chirikov overlap near the plasma edge at reasonable SPA currents  Simulation: RWM coils (1-4) 0.5 kA, (2-6) 0.5 kA, (3-5) 1.5 kA J-K. Park Chirikov parameter

4. NSTX XP818: ELM mitigation w/midplane coils - SAS ELM mitigation by DC fields might be resonant effect DIII-D indicates narrow q window for ELM mitigation Should scan q 95 to insure that window is not missed

5. NSTX XP818: ELM mitigation w/midplane coils - SAS Planned mixed even/odd parity fields require non- diametrically-opposed coil pairs odd parity fields alone are standard anti-series connection even parity fields alone are “new” standard series connection 1 4 RWM coils

6. NSTX XP818: ELM mitigation w/midplane coils - SAS XP818 ELM Mitigation - Run plan Task Number of Shots 1) Create target plasmas A) Create q95 < 6 target: (generate at least 10 ELMs with approximately even spacing) (q95 ~ 5.5 is adequate) - Use shot 124349 as setup shot, (Ip = 0.8 MA, Bt = 0.5 T), change NBI source C to 1 MW unmodulated 2 - Raise Ip to 0.9 MA; change Bt to 0.45T, then 0.40T3 - If q95 > 6 and insufficient ELMs, perform startup optimizations as per J. Menard to raise qmin.(8) B) Create q95 ramp target - Start from low q95 target created in step (1A), Ip flat-top to 0.7 MA, ramping up to 1.0 MA; adjust eventual Ip flat-top if needed to create steady ELMs.4 - if plasma drops out of H-mode, start Ip ramp from 1.0 MA ramping to 0.7 MA(2) - vary Bt to change range of q ramp (optional)(2) C) Create q95 > 8 target - Use shot 124349 as setup shot, (Ip = 0.8 MA, Bt = 0.5 T), change NBI source C to 1 MW unmodulated - Drop Ip to 0.7 MA; tweak to 0.75 MA if desired2 2) Attempt ELM mitigation with non-axisymmetric fields under normal recycling conditions - DC fields: A) Apply n = 3 field configuration; vary amplitude from 1.5 kA4 B) Apply n = 3 + 1 field configuration; vary amplitude from 1.0 kA, 0.5 kA4 C) Apply n = 2 + 3 field configuration (start from RWM (1-4) 0.5kA, RWM (2,6) 0.5kA, RWM (3,5) 1.5 kA)4 D) Apply n = 2 field configuration; vary amplitude from 1.5 kA4 E) Apply n = 6 field configuration (primary field is n = 0); vary amplitude from 2.5 kA3 - AC fields (pre-programmed): F) Apply n = 3; vary f above/below ELM frequency; vary amplitude from 2.0 kA4 G) Apply n = 1 (co-propagating); vary f above/below ELM frequency; vary amplitude4 H) Apply n = 1 (ctr-propagating); vary f above/below ELM frequency; vary amplitude4 - AC fields (n = 1 feedback): I) n = 1 Br feedback: giant ELM target (e.g. 125271), vary (i) gain (ii) phase6 3) Attempt ELM mitigation with non-axisymmetric fields under reduced recycling conditions16 Total (optional): 64 (12) V1.0

7. NSTX XP818: ELM mitigation w/midplane coils - SAS XP818 ELM Mitigation – first “1/2” day run plan Task Number of Shots 1) Create target plasmas A) Create q95 < 6 target: (generate at least 10 ELMs with approximately even spacing) (q95 ~ 5.5 is adequate) - Use shot 124349 as setup shot, (Ip = 0.8 MA, Bt = 0.5 T), change NBI source C to 1 MW unmodulated2 - Raise Ip to 0.9 MA; vary Bt to 0.45T, then 0.40T3 - If q95 > 6 and insufficient ELMs, perform startup optimization as per J. Menard to raise qmin. (8) B) Create q95 ramp target - Start from low q95 target created in step (1A), Ip flat-top to 0.7 MA, ramping up to 1.0 MA; adjust eventual Ip flat-top if needed to create steady ELMs.4 - If plasma drops out of H-mode, start Ip ramp from 1.0 MA ramping to 0.7 MA (2) - Vary Bt to change range of q ramp (optional) (2) 2) Attempt ELM mitigation with non-axisymmetric fields under normal recycling conditions - DC and AC fields: i) Apply DC n = 3 field configuration; vary amplitude from 1.5kA2 ii) Apply AC n = 3; vary f above/below ELM frequency; vary amplitude2 iii) Apply DC n = 3 + 1 field configuration; vary amplitude from 1.5kA2 iv) Apply AC n = 1 (co-propagating); vary f above/below ELM frequency; vary amplitude2 (optionally include n = 3 based on results from (iii) above) Total (optional): 17 (12) V1.0