Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

MEASURING THE COMPETITIVENESS OF A FIRM Prof. Dr. Dilek Çetindamar Sabancı School of Management Sabancı University & Hakan Kilitçioğlu Arge Consulting.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "MEASURING THE COMPETITIVENESS OF A FIRM Prof. Dr. Dilek Çetindamar Sabancı School of Management Sabancı University & Hakan Kilitçioğlu Arge Consulting."— Presentation transcript:

1

2 MEASURING THE COMPETITIVENESS OF A FIRM Prof. Dr. Dilek Çetindamar Sabancı School of Management Sabancı University & Hakan Kilitçioğlu Arge Consulting June 2013

3 Dilek Cetindamar, Hakan Kilitcioglu, (2013),"Measuring the competitiveness of a firm for an award system", Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal incorporating Journal of Global Competitiveness, Vol. 23 Iss: 1 pp. 7 - 22

4 Contents Goal Model Advantages Next

5 Origins of the model TUSIAD - Sabancı University Competitiveness Forum (REF) is a research center formed in Istanbul in 2003 by: Turkish Industrialists’ and Businessmen’s Assoc.and Sabancı University.

6 REF’s mission is; to help improve the competitiveness of Turkish private sector in international markets by conducting and supporting research on competitiveness, innovation and technology management and benchmarking. Specialized in measuring competitiveness at the: national, sectorial, company level.

7 Collaborate with SEDEFED (the Federation of Industrial Associations) on Competitiveness Congress Develop and launch the award together Project start: 2009 November 10 applicants Project ends: 2010 November

8 Goal Measuring competitiveness at the firm level

9 Literature review Competitiveness: to utilize a nation’s human, capital, and natural resources in their ultimate productivity. Nations compete with each other to supply an environment to attract investments, keep high productivity, high wages and sustainable growth.

10 Measurements are at the national level. Best examples: Institute for Management Development (IMD)’s World Competitiveness Yearbook and World Economic Forum’s Global Competitiveness Index (GCI) (since 1979)

11 WEF: Publicly available data & the Executive Opinion Survey 12 major pillars/measurement categories: 1.well-functioning public and private institutions 2.appropriate infrastructure 3.a stable macroeconomic framework 4.good health and primary education 5.higher education and training 6.efficient product markets 7.efficient labor markets 8.efficient financial markets 9.the ability to harness the benefits of existing technologies 10.market size 11.producing new and different goods using the most sophisticated production processes 12.through innovation

12 Lack of academic studies at firm level Few studies only Muhittin Oral’s brillant models but very complex

13 Model Competitiveness refers to a firm’s capacity to compete in a specific market, to increase its market share, to enter international markets by exporting, and to achieve sustainable growth and profitability.

14 Objectives of the award: Raising awareness on sustainable global competitiveness Reward those who have achieved sustainable global competitiveness Raising awareness on basic criteria that enhances competitiveness Increasing the companies’ ability to compete by way of spreading the exemplar practices of the successful companies

15 International examples? Deloitte “Fast Growing company competition” (only IT) “The Porter Prize” considers one dimension of the firm in competition: strategy. Since 2001 (in Japan only) The UK award model is developed and given by a magazine called “Real Business” since 1997 (for UK firms) The Belgium award: “The European Business Awards” sponsored by the Dutch bank HSBC and other business organizations (European firms)

16 3 Pillars of: “The Most Competitive Firm of the Year” 1.OUTCOME since company needs to show performance in all aspects of what it does to compete. 2.RESOURCES an umbrella term to describe competencies of a firm. 3. MANAGERIAL PROCESSES AND CAPABILITIES to include a capability term in order to include the role of management in the transfer of inputs into outputs.

17 Leadership Sustainability of strategies Ability to develop processes and systems Human Resources Technology, Innovation, Design Financial Resources Outcome Indicators (%40) Resources (%30) Managerial Processes and Capability (%30) (which provides effective and efficient use of resources) Customer & Society GrowthExportValue added & Profit Outcome Indicators

18 Advantages One of the first complete model One of a few award models at operation

19 Advantages 1.Multi-faceted evaluation Only the last year is evaluated but the last three years’ performance is taken into account. “Goal” and “Accrued” data from the company records “Comparison” data from the company’s competitors or the best in their field, or market performance average 2.Compatibility to All Sectors and Flexibility “Relevance” title gives the company to rate the performance for its relevance to their sector. Each company is given an “open ended question” to guide us on how to evaluate their performance The award comprises questions for “all sectors” from manufacturing to service.

20 3.Considering performance data within a context by evaluating it with its connections to company resources and infrastructure

21 21 EXAMPLE: HUMAN RESOURCES PERFORMANCE Relevance200720082009 Employee Satisfaction Percentage Realized Goal Comparison In-house Training Hours per Employee Realized Goal Comparison Number of Improvement Proposals per Employee Realized Goal Comparison Please answer the following questions about the Human Resources approaches (qualitative measures) in your company 1. Is your human Resources Management compatible with your company’s strategies? How do you achieve this compatibility? 2. Does your company use performance based salary system? …… Results (objective measures):

22 Results score= [(the scope of each criteria x realized performance)/2] x (targets) x (benchmarking)

23

24

25 Approach score= (appropriateness and development level of the approach) x (implementation) x (achieving sustainability)

26

27

28 CUSTOMER & SOCIETY B (Customer) MANAGERIAL PROCESSES AND CAPABILITY

29 29 Evaluation Process(1) Application ProsessSelecting the Assessors Handing over the Application Forms to the Assessors Individual Evaluations * Positive aspects * Improvement opportunities * Questions

30 30 Evaluation Process(2) Reaching a consensus and site visit planningSite VisitsReaching a consensus and Scoring Announcing the Prize Winner Jury meeting The Award Ceremony Sending the final evaluation reports to the applicants

31

32 Next Customize the model for SMEs Work on the Category 2 award:“The Fastest Growing Company with its International Operations”

33 Contact: Prof. Dilek Cetindamar, dilek@sabanciuniv.edu Hakan Kilitçioğlu, hkilitcioglu@arge.com www.ref.sabanciuniv.edu www.rekabetkongresi.org


Download ppt "MEASURING THE COMPETITIVENESS OF A FIRM Prof. Dr. Dilek Çetindamar Sabancı School of Management Sabancı University & Hakan Kilitçioğlu Arge Consulting."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google