Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byElaine Oliver Modified over 9 years ago
1
Advanced Corporate Finance GMIF Additional Material
2
Multiples Great for Summarizing Valuations, Very dangerous for Performing Valuations
3
Philosophy of a multiple Triangulation From here on down, everything is the same Sources of multiples Comparable companies – “Trading” multiples Comparable transactions – “Transaction” multiples Structure of any multiple – ratio between An easily observable variable (Earnings, Sales, Employees, etc.) A measure of value (Price, Market Value, etc.) Both measures should be compatible Equity Value numerator and FV denominator are incompatible The inverse of every multiple is a return measure (e.g. P/E and ROE) Basics of multiples
4
Multiples as Summaries
5
Summaries of Growth Patterns
6
Ratio pyramid – FIRM VALUE
7
RATIO PYRAMID – EQUITY VALUE
8
First, Agree on a Discount Rate
9
Three underlying concepts behind every multiple Growth rate Discount rate Relationship between driver variable and UFCF How to analyze a multiple Differences in ratios may come from structural differences in business structure (margins, turnovers, etc.) rather than from growth and risk
10
Choice between Using too many data points and including some that are not really comparable Using too few data points and cherry-picking comparables to get the desired result Best practice 1. First analyze value range based on broadest possible set of comparables 2. Pick all companies that compete against target 3. See if there are clearly identifiable subgroups amongst comparables 4. Check if these subgroups stay constant when using different multiples Choosing comparable companies
11
Identify possible conditioning variables Market returns Market expectations (especially of growth) Industry ratios (P/B especially) Take into account inflation Take into account Private Benefits of Control Take into account synergies Take into account post-transaction industry structure (market power) Take into account eventual result of transactions to separate optimistic from objective valuations Choosing comparable transactions
12
Key Multiples
13
Most widely used multiple Inverse is ROE at market values, immediate measure of Equity holders potential returns Since “Normal” P /E is 1/r with no growth 1 / (r – g) for forward-looking multiples Unless ROE is above r E additional growth is irrelevant for valuation Maximum sustainable growth rate: Where k is the payout ratio Key multiples: P/E
14
“Normal” value is 1 Values above 1 represent the present value of abnormal (extraordinary) returns Values under 1 signal distressed company, as accounting follows principle of prudence Differing accounting standards might lead to different P/Bs, even in the long run Sometimes used as a proxy for Tobin’s q (Market value / Replacement value) Key multiples: P/B
15
Aka misleadingly as EV / EBITDA Firm Value (IC) equivalent to P/E EBITDA is easily computable, but not a very good proxy for UFCF (the theoretically sound variable to use) As a Firm Value multiple it only looks at Operating Performance and Asset Value Typically used in industries with low asset turnovers and subject to egregious earnings manipulations through the capitalization of R&D or other expenditures Discount rate to be used is WACC Key multiples: FV / EBITDA
16
In Vogue during the dotcom bubble Used extensively in early-stage VC How do you value a company with no profits, not even sales Make “heroic” assumptions about inter-firm comparability Susceptible to easy manipulation by management Examples: FV / PhD, FV / suscriber, FV / click Key multiples: moneyless multiples
17
Equivalent Multiples Main Returns ROE ROA ROIC (aka ROCE) ROMVIC ROI CFROI Multiples and returns EquityFirm Accounting ProfitabilityP / EFV / NOPAT Market ValuationP / BFV / IC Cash ProfitabilityP / CFPSFV / UFCF
18
RATIOS and drivers
19
Forecast flow rather than stock variables Income Statement and Cash Flow statement accounts are easier to forecast than Balance Sheet accounts Greatest exception to this rule is Debt - it makes more sense to target a certain leverage ratio (Debt / IC) Forecast Balance Sheet items based on movements in Income Statement Balance Sheet Every Balance Sheet movement must be reflected in either or both Otherwise balance sheet will not balance Every CFS and IS movement should affect the Balance Sheet Otherwise balance sheet (or reconciliation of cash) will not balance Forecasting dos and don’ts
20
“Normal” is level without growth If ROE = r then P = B The “normal” value of P/B is 1 We do not expect abnormal earnings From the dividend discount model “Normal” (no growth) P/E is a function of pay-out and ROE “Normal” P/E and P/B
21
“Normal” P/E in terms of EBO is P/E is normal if current abnormal earnings continue at same level in the future EBO And multiple “normality”
22
Relationship between p/B and P/E
23
“Cosmetic” changes to increase earnings result in higher book values and therefore lower future abnormal earnings – effect washes out Example Initial Book Value €5,000 Initial Net Income €1,000 Two choices Expense restructuring charge of €300 all during 2010 Expense charge over the period 2011-2013 Valuation by EBO at year end 2010 is the same Also true for valuation at beginning 2010 Self-correcting Nature Of Accounting
24
YearBook t-1 IncomeChargeNet Income Req. Return EaEa 2010€ 5,000€ 1,000€ 300€ 700 2011 5,700 1,050 0 € 570€ 480 2012 6,750 1,100 0 675 425 2013 7,850 1,150 0 785 365 EXAMPLE YearBook t-1 IncomeChargeNet Income Req. Return EaEa 2010€ 5,000€ 1,000€ 0€ 1,000 2011 6,000 1,050 150 900€ 600€ 300 2012 6,900 1,100 100 1,000 690 310 2013 7,900 1,150 50 1,100 790 310
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.