Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Accreditation 2015 Update: Harbor’s Assessment-based Planning System (HAPS) Integrating Learning Outcomes Assessment, Student Achievement Data and Institution-Set.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Accreditation 2015 Update: Harbor’s Assessment-based Planning System (HAPS) Integrating Learning Outcomes Assessment, Student Achievement Data and Institution-Set."— Presentation transcript:

1 Accreditation 2015 Update: Harbor’s Assessment-based Planning System (HAPS) Integrating Learning Outcomes Assessment, Student Achievement Data and Institution-Set Standards with College Program Review, Planning and Resource Allocation Processes Assessment Committee 17 November 2016

2 Assessment Committee Presentation November 17, 2015, Slide 2  The College Mission is implemented through the college Strategic Educational Master Plan (SEMP) the achievement of Institutional Student Learning Outcomes (ISLO)  SEMP identifies institutional goals and articulates the objectives and performance measures that evaluate the achievement of these goals  ISLOs are measured through the assessment of student learning outcomes at the course level  Harbor’s institutional outcomes conform with those articulated in the Los Angeles Community College District Strategic Plan assuring that the College’s mission is in alignment with the District’s  Together, these institutional outcomes provide a framework to evaluate the achievement of the college Mission Centrality of the College Mission

3 Assessment Committee Presentation November 17, 2015, Slide 3 Integration of Assessment and Planning

4 Assessment Committee Presentation November 17, 2015, Slide 4  The SEMP incudes all student achievement measures as well as measures that align with state-required, college functional plans and other institutional priorities  College program review, planning and resource allocations processes use these measures to align program and operational activities with the college mission  Three year cycle to assure that the college has sufficient time to achieve institutional outcomes and addresses all institutional requirements  At the end of the three year cycle, SEMP progress and college-level student achievement data are evaluated and used to assess the achievement of the college mission.  The mission evaluation/renewal process then drives the next strategic educational master planning cycle SEMP Assesses Mission Achievement

5 Assessment Committee Presentation November 17, 2015, Slide 5  SEMP measures provide a framework for the college- wide Program Review process and the analysis of program-level student achievement data.  SEMP measure analysis results are used to generate improvement actions at the program level.  These improvement actions are the basis of the college unit planning and resource allocation processes.  All of these activities are organized online to track assessment results, unit plans and the request and allocation of resources. SEMP defines Program Review

6 Assessment Committee Presentation November 17, 2015, Slide 6  Results are summarized for review and oversight by the college administrative and governance process  College level results are used by the College Planning Council to identify annual institutional priorities within the three year strategic planning cycle.  These priorities guide annual planning and resource allocation decisions. HAPS Manages Assessment Results

7 Assessment Committee Presentation November 17, 2015, Slide 7  For measures where there is an established institution-set standard, College operational units and instructional programs evaluate their performance based on the standard.  Institution-set standards required by the Federal government: Completion, Job Placement  Standards required by the State of California: ARCC, IEPI, SSSP, Equity  Other standards or requirements: ACCJC, Nursing, Perkins, grants  Units and programs that do not meet the standard are required to create an improvement activity to address that result. Institution Set Standards

8 Assessment Committee Presentation November 17, 2015, Slide 8 Data Element Institution Set Standard Stretch Goal SEMP Measure 2013/ 2014 2012/ 2013 2011/ 2012 Three- year Ave Course Completion Rate 65%72%2.2.365.9%66.8% 66.5% Program Completion Rate June 2016* 2.2.340.1%45.1%41.3%42.2% CTE completion rate June 2016* 2.3.257.8%60.0%60.6%59.5% Degrees Awarded 672June 2016*2.2.3838635543672 Certificates Awarded 66.3June 2016*2.2.345569866 University Transfers 489June 2016*2.2.3477473516489 College-level Student Achievement Data, Analysis & Results * The CCCCO’s IEPI reporting requires the college to establish standards and goals for student achievement measures identified in the framework. Harbor will establish these goals in June 2016.

9 Assessment Committee Presentation November 17, 2015, Slide 9 Data Element Program-level Analysis Results Standard SEMP Measure 2013/ 2014 2012/ 2013 2011/ 2012 Three-yr Average Associate of Arts Degrees 20% meet standard (2/10) 51.72.2.379525763 Associate of Science Degrees 14% meet standard (3/22) 6.42.2.310788 Associate for Transfer Degrees 100% meet standard (1/1) 1.72.2.30000 Certificates 22% meet standard (4/18) 3.72.2.34485 Course Completion 59% meet standard (48/81) 65%2.2.365.9%66.8% 66.5% Course Completion - Online NN% meet standard65%2.2.356.2%59.3%61.1%58.9% Licensure Passage Rate - Nursing Meets standard85%2.3.2100%98.3%97.1%98.5% Licensure Passage Rate - EMT Does not meet standard60%2.3.257%n/a Licensure Passage Rate - CNA Meet standard85%2.3.2100% 81%93.7% Job Placement Rate NN% meet standard72.5%2.3.372.8%69.8%74.8%72.5% Program-level Student Achievement Data, Analysis & Results

10 Assessment Committee Presentation November 17, 2015, Slide 10 Course-level Student Learning Outcomes Data, Analysis & Results

11 Assessment Committee Presentation November 17, 2015, Slide 11  This is a little story about four people named Everybody, Somebody, Anybody, and Nobody.  There was an important job to be done and Everybody was sure that Somebody would do it.  Anybody could have done it, but Nobody did it.  Somebody got angry about that because it was Everybody's job.  Everybody thought that Anybody could do it, but Nobody realized that Everybody wouldn't do it.  It ended up that Everybody blamed Somebody when Nobody did what Anybody could have done Everybody, Somebody, Anybody, And Nobody

12 Assessment Committee Presentation November 17, 2015, Slide 12  Strategic Educational Master Plan 2014-17 Strategic Educational Master Plan 2014-17  Student Success Scorecard 2015 Student Success Scorecard 2015  SEMP Fact Book SEMP Fact Book  Harbor's Assessment-based Planning System (HAPS) Harbor's Assessment-based Planning System  Program Review 2.0 Program Review 2.0  SLO Assessment Pilot SLO Assessment Pilot  SEMP Outcomes Summary (login) SEMP Outcomes Summary (login)  Program Review Module Summary (login) Program Review Module Summary (login)  ISLO Inventory (login) ISLO Inventory (login)  SLO Assessment Summary (login) SLO Assessment Summary (login) QUESTIONS/DISCUSSION


Download ppt "Accreditation 2015 Update: Harbor’s Assessment-based Planning System (HAPS) Integrating Learning Outcomes Assessment, Student Achievement Data and Institution-Set."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google