Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

D. Dutta 13th CBM Collaboration Meeting 1 Dipanwita Dutta Much Segmentation Study: A Flexible Scheme.

Published byDaniella Scott Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "D. Dutta 13th CBM Collaboration Meeting 1 Dipanwita Dutta Much Segmentation Study: A Flexible Scheme."— Presentation transcript:

1 D. Dutta 13th CBM Collaboration Meeting 1 Dipanwita Dutta Much Segmentation Study: A Flexible Scheme

2 D. Dutta 13th CBM Collaboration Meeting 2  Existing Segmentation Scheme (5% Occupancy)  Flexible Segmentation Scheme –Aim –Plan –Implementation –Examples –Improve coverage near beam pipe –Hit Production  Summary and Future Plan Outline

3 D. Dutta 13th CBM Collaboration Meeting 3 Muon Simulations  cbmroot release v.APR08  UrQMD central events Au+Au at 25 AGeV  all strips STS  compact MuCh 5 iron absorber (125cm) 15 MuCh stations  MuCh hit producer without clusters  L1 (STS) and LiT (MuCh) tracking  cbmroot release v.APR08  UrQMD central events Au+Au at 25 AGeV  all strips STS  compact MuCh 5 iron absorber (125cm) 15 MuCh stations  MuCh hit producer without clusters  L1 (STS) and LiT (MuCh) tracking

4 D. Dutta 13th CBM Collaboration Meeting 4 Existing Segmentation Scheme 5% Hit occupancy Central Au+Au Collision @ 25 AGeV from UrQMD Compact Much Min Pad size 1.4 × 2.8 mm 2

5 D. Dutta 13th CBM Collaboration Meeting 5 Regio ns Hit Density hit/event/cm 2 PadW(cm)PadL(cm)SecW(cm)SecL(cm) 1>0.40.1380.2772.217 20.2-0.40.277 2.2174.434 30.1-0.20.2770.5544.434 40.05-0.10.554 4.4348.868 50.025-0.50.5541.1088.868 60.01-0.0251.108 8.86817.74 70.005-0.011.1082.21717.74 80.0025-0.0052.217 17.7435.43 90.001-0.00252.2174.43435.43 Existing Scheme: Sector and Pad Dimensions

6 D. Dutta 13th CBM Collaboration Meeting 6 1. Based on 5% Occupancy : governed by Hit Density 2. Define 9 Regions of different Sector sizes 3. Sector as well as pad dim. doubled seq. 4. Each Sector is having 128 channels 5. Start region number for each Station Triplet depends on the hit density 6. The radius vector of different regions is defined from HDensity histogram Existing Segmentation scheme Station 1 6 regions, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Rad: 13.7,20,28,36,44,52,62.3 Min Pad dimension: 1.4×2.8 mm 2 – unrealistic

7 D. Dutta 13th CBM Collaboration Meeting 7 Less Efficiency Less coverage near beam pipe Hit Production Efficiency Hit prod. Efficiency= N hits /N Mc. points ● MC Points ● Reco Hits

8 D. Dutta 13th CBM Collaboration Meeting 8  To study the realistic detector design by optimising pad layout  To make the detector design simple  To have flexibility of sector sizes and pad sizes  To get more coverage near the pipe Aim: Flexible Segmentation Scheme

9 D. Dutta 13th CBM Collaboration Meeting 9 Steps: 1. Keep 9 Regions of Diff. Sector sizes 2. Make Flexible Radius for Diff. Regions 3. Flexible No. of Regions 4. Flexible Pad Dimension 5. Flexible Number of Channels 6. Improve coverage near beam pipe Plan: Flexible Segmentation Scheme

10 D. Dutta 13th CBM Collaboration Meeting 10 Implementation: Flexible Seg. Scheme  Introduced Option for Different Scheme (1) Option 0: Original Segmentation Scheme 5% Occupancy (2) Option 1: Flexible Segmentation Scheme (Dec08 Release)  Flexible radius of regions  Flexible no. of regions  Improved coverage near beam pipe (3) Option 2: Flexible Segmentation Scheme (Recent)   Option of variable Channel No. (1 → 128)  Option of variable pad dimension

11 D. Dutta 13th CBM Collaboration Meeting 11  Station: 10,11,12 (after 4 th absorber) Existing: Existing: Rad.of diff. regions (8,9) 42 cm Flexible: Flexible: Rad.of diff. regions (2,8,9) Rad [ ]={27,42} //cm Reg [ ]={2,8,9} R_int=26.2 cm R_ext=124.5 cm Example: Flexible Seg. Scheme (Option1 )

12 D. Dutta 13th CBM Collaboration Meeting 12 Station: 10,11,12 Station: 10,11,12 (after 4 th absorber) Example: Flexible Seg. Scheme (Option 1) ● MC Points ● Reconstructed Hits

13 D. Dutta 13th CBM Collaboration Meeting 13 Improved Coverage: Flexible Seg Scheme Allow Sectors inside the Beam Pipe To remove the efficiency loss due to less coverage near the beam pipe Implemented for optimization of pad size

14 D. Dutta 13th CBM Collaboration Meeting 14 Efficiency Improved – by improving the coverage Hit Prod. Efficiency with Flexible Seg. Scheme ( Improved coverage) Std. Seg. Hit Prod. Eff: ~90% Improved coverage: Hit Prod. Eff. ~98% DEC08 Release

15 D. Dutta 13th CBM Collaboration Meeting 15 No. of Ch. =128 No. of Ch. =64 No. of Ch. =32 Regi ons PadW (cm) PadL (cm) SecW (cm) SecL (cm) SecW (cm) SecL (cm) SecW (cm) SecL (cm) 10.1380.2772.217 1.1082.2171.108 20.277 2.2174.4342.217 1.1082.217 30.2770.5544.434 2.2174.4342.217 40.554 4.4348.8684.434 2.2174.434 50.5541.1088.868 4.4348.8684.434 61.108 8.86817.748.868 4.4348.868 71.1082.21717.74 8.86817.748.868 82.217 17.7435.4317.74 8.86817.74 92.2174.43435.43 17.7435.4317.74 Flexible Segmentation Scheme (Option 2) MinPadW =1.38mm MinPadL =2.77mm minPadW and minPadL and No. of Channel is input Additional Feature: Flexible No. of Channel and Flexible pad dimension

16 D. Dutta 13th CBM Collaboration Meeting 16 No. of channel/sec: 128 Sec. (3): 4.43×4.43 cm 2 (4): 4.43×8.87 cm 2 (5): 8.87×8.87 cm 2 No. of sec: 320 No. of channels: 40960 Sec. (3): 2.21×4.43 cm 2 (4): 4.43×4.43 cm 2 (5): 4.43×8.87 cm 2 No. of sec: 628 No. of channels: 40192 No. of channel/sec: 64 Sec. (3): 2.21×2.21 cm 2 (4): 2.21×4.43 cm 2 (5): 4.43×4.43 cm 2 No. of sec: 1196 No. of channels : 38272 No. of channel/sec: 32 Stations : 1, 2, 3 Reg: 3,4,5 Rad: 25,45 r_int=13.7, r_ext=62.3 cm Blue: Reg. 3, Pad: 2.77 × 5.54 mm 2 Yellow: Reg. 4, Pad: 5.54 × 5.54 mm 2 Magenta: Reg. 5, Pad: 5.54 × 10.08 mm 2 Example: Flexible Seg. Scheme ( Option 2)

17 D. Dutta 13th CBM Collaboration Meeting 17 Example: Flexible Seg. Scheme ( Option 2) No. of channel/sec: 16 Sec. (3): 1.11×2.21 cm 2 (4): 2.21×2.21 cm 2 (5): 2.21×4.43 cm 2 No. of sec: 2316 No. of channels: 37056 Sec. (3):1.11×1.11 cm 2 (4):1.11×2.21 cm 2 (5): 2.21×2.21 cm 2 No. of sec: 4580 No. of channels: 36640 No. of channel/sec: 8 Sec. (3): 0.55×1.11 cm 2 (4): 1.11×1.11 cm 2 (5): 1.11×2.21 cm 2 No. of sec: 9060 No. of channels : 36240 No. of channel/sec: 4 Stations : 4, 5, 6 Reg: 3,4,5 Rad: 25, 45 Blue: Reg. 3, Pad: 2.77 × 5.54 mm 2 Yellow: Reg. 4, Pad: 5.54 × 5.54 mm 2 Magenta: Reg. 5, Pad: 5.54 × 10.08 mm 2

18 D. Dutta 13th CBM Collaboration Meeting 18 Study of Hit Prod. Efficiency for different digi scheme 12345 22345 42345 32345 34567 34556 S/B and Efficiency study required to optimize pad dimension

19 D. Dutta 13th CBM Collaboration Meeting 19 Hit Production Efficiency 34556 seems to be the Mimimum Pad dimensions in stations from Hit Efficiency Stat/per event: Mc. Points:2990 Rc. Hits :2941 Multihits :47 Outside :0.97 Min pad size: 2.8×5.6 mm 2 2.8×5.5 mm 2 5.5×5.5 mm 2 11.1×11.1 mm 2 5.5×11.1 mm 2 6 times larger and Realistic

20 D. Dutta 13th CBM Collaboration Meeting 20  A Flexible Segmentation scheme for Much implemented – –Flexibility in radius of different region – –Flexibility in number of regions – –Flexibility in No. of Channels – –Flexibility in pad dimension   Improved coverage near beam pipe   Min. pad dimension 2.8×5.6 mm 2 shows good Hit efficiency (3 times larger and realistic pad dimension)   Flexible Segmentation works with hit production and upto reconstructionSummary

21 D. Dutta 13th CBM Collaboration Meeting 21  Study the realistic digitization with Clustering and Avalanche  Optimisation of detector layout for quarkonium *Thanks for input from A. Kiseleva for this study Thank you Future Plan

Download ppt "D. Dutta 13th CBM Collaboration Meeting 1 Dipanwita Dutta Much Segmentation Study: A Flexible Scheme."

Similar presentations

CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)

CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Beam-plug and shielding studies related to HCAL and M2 Robert Paluch, Burkhard Schmidt November 25, 2014 1.

Beam-plug and shielding studies related to HCAL and M2 Robert Paluch, Burkhard Schmidt November 25,
Invariant mass plot for different geometry schemes using HSD generator Hemen Kalita*,B Bhattacharjee*, P Bhaduri and S Chattopadhyay * Dept of Physics,

Invariant mass plot for different geometry schemes using HSD generator Hemen Kalita*,B Bhattacharjee*, P Bhaduri and S Chattopadhyay * Dept of Physics,
1 Geometry layout studies of the RICH detector in the CBM experiment Elena Belolaptikova Dr. Claudia Hoehne Moscow State Institute of Radioengineering,

1 Geometry layout studies of the RICH detector in the CBM experiment Elena Belolaptikova Dr. Claudia Hoehne Moscow State Institute of Radioengineering,
12 th CBM Collaboration Meeting October 13-18, 2008, JINR, Dubna A. Zinchenko 1 (L.Naumann 2, D.Peshekhonov 1, V.Peshekhonov 1 ) 1 VBLHEP, JINR, Dubna.

12 th CBM Collaboration Meeting October 13-18, 2008, JINR, Dubna A. Zinchenko 1 (L.Naumann 2, D.Peshekhonov 1, V.Peshekhonov 1 ) 1 VBLHEP, JINR, Dubna.
Simulation Studies of a (DEPFET) Vertex Detector for SuperBelle Ariane Frey, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik München Contents: Software framework Simulation.

Simulation Studies of a (DEPFET) Vertex Detector for SuperBelle Ariane Frey, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik München Contents: Software framework Simulation.
1 Forward Tracking Simulation Norman A. Graf ALCPG Cornell July 15, 2003.

1 Forward Tracking Simulation Norman A. Graf ALCPG Cornell July 15, 2003.
Feasibility Studies of Low-mass Mesons Identification for the CBM Project Radosław Karabowicz Hot Matter Physics Department, Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian.

Feasibility Studies of Low-mass Mesons Identification for the CBM Project Radosław Karabowicz Hot Matter Physics Department, Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian.
D 0  K -,  + reconstruction with CBM STS detector I.Vassiliev (GSI) CBM collaboration meeting 06-Oct-04 Simulation tools (cbmroot) & geometry Signal.

D 0  K -,  + reconstruction with CBM STS detector I.Vassiliev (GSI) CBM collaboration meeting 06-Oct-04 Simulation tools (cbmroot) & geometry Signal.
Status & Plans of Segmentation Y.P.Viyogi(V.E.C.C) Arun Prakash(B.H.U)

Status & Plans of Segmentation Y.P.Viyogi(V.E.C.C) Arun Prakash(B.H.U)
Sergey Belogurov, ITEP, Moscow STS CAD model. GSI, 19.04.07 STS mechanics: Conceptual CAD model development Sergey Belogurov ITEP, Moscow Engineer: Sergey.

Sergey Belogurov, ITEP, Moscow STS CAD model. GSI, STS mechanics: Conceptual CAD model development Sergey Belogurov ITEP, Moscow Engineer: Sergey.
STS Simulations Anna Kotynia 15 th CBM Collaboration Meeting April 12 - 16, 2010, GSI 1.

STS Simulations Anna Kotynia 15 th CBM Collaboration Meeting April , 2010, GSI 1.
Simulation activities in India: students working on various topics.. Partha(VECC), Hemen (GU) : Trigger, SIS100, physics simulation Bipasha (CU): dynamic.

Simulation activities in India: students working on various topics.. Partha(VECC), Hemen (GU) : Trigger, SIS100, physics simulation Bipasha (CU): dynamic.
C B M Di-electron background studies and first results using compact RICH CBM Collaboration Meeting, 27 September 2007, Dresden Di-electron background.

C B M Di-electron background studies and first results using compact RICH CBM Collaboration Meeting, 27 September 2007, Dresden Di-electron background.
Di-electron pair reconstruction CBM Collaboration Meeting, 28 February 2008, GSI-Darmstadt Di-electron pair reconstruction Tetyana Galatyuk GSI-Darmstadt.

Di-electron pair reconstruction CBM Collaboration Meeting, 28 February 2008, GSI-Darmstadt Di-electron pair reconstruction Tetyana Galatyuk GSI-Darmstadt.
06.10.2004CBM Collaboration Meeting 1 Simulation Status V. Friese.

CBM Collaboration Meeting 1 Simulation Status V. Friese.
Elastic Neural Net for standalone RICH ring finding Sergey Gorbunov Ivan Kisel DESY, Zeuthen KIP, Uni-Heidelberg DESY, Zeuthen KIP, Uni-Heidelberg KIP.

Elastic Neural Net for standalone RICH ring finding Sergey Gorbunov Ivan Kisel DESY, Zeuthen KIP, Uni-Heidelberg DESY, Zeuthen KIP, Uni-Heidelberg KIP.
Simulations with event pile up in MVD 1. Improvement of the MVD-digitiser 2. General simulations with pile up 3. Open charm reconstruction Christina Dritsa.

Simulations with event pile up in MVD 1. Improvement of the MVD-digitiser 2. General simulations with pile up 3. Open charm reconstruction Christina Dritsa.
David Emschermann CBM Collaboration Meeting - GSI – 12/04/2010 TRD geometry in CBMroot and conclusions for detector module design David Emschermann Institut.

David Emschermann CBM Collaboration Meeting - GSI – 12/04/2010 TRD geometry in CBMroot and conclusions for detector module design David Emschermann Institut.
Ooo Performance simulation studies of a realistic model of the CBM Silicon Tracking System Silicon Tracking for CBM Reconstructed URQMD event: central.

Ooo Performance simulation studies of a realistic model of the CBM Silicon Tracking System Silicon Tracking for CBM Reconstructed URQMD event: central.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google