1. WP 5: Task 1 country reviews Cristina Chiotan Ingrid Stegeman EuroHealthNet

2. WWW.CHRODIS.EU Country reviews publication Questionnaire developed and agreed by WP5 partners (first WP5 meeting Cologne, 28-29 April 2014); 14 partners sent their response to the questionnaire 14 country reviews were edited and EN proof read; 14 edited country reviews sent to partners for approval; country reviews approved by CHAFEA and posted on JA- CHRODIS website. –focusing mainly on cardiovascular disease, stroke and diabetes type 2 –that also address major risk factors, like diet, inactivity, alcohol abuse and smoking -social determinants of health –with a special focus on older people, inequalities For ‘Platform for Knowledge Exchange’, ‘Clearinghouse’

3. WWW.CHRODIS.EU Analysis of country reports Objective: To enable partners to learn about other countries, to facilitate the exchange of ideas and practices and to feed into a discussion and contribute to summary overview on the findings. (not a mandatory project deliverable)

4. WWW.CHRODIS.EU Analysis of country reports Results: Each partner will read 2 different country reports (one from a similar system and context and one from a very different system/context); Each partner follow specific questions on common issues, gaps and needs, lessons learned and opportunities for further exchange and learning

5. WWW.CHRODIS.EU Analysis of country reports Criteria for groups of country analysis: The aim is to ensure a good basis for discussion and opportunities for experience exchange and further learning; Countries close geographically and also with similar policy and public health contexts and one country which brings a new perspective in the group; Each partner could read/analyse any other country report found relevant.

6. WWW.CHRODIS.EU Analysis of country reports Proposed groups of partners: Norway, Iceland, Lithuania, UK Greece, Spain, Italy, Cyprus Ireland, Estonia, Germany Bulgaria, Netherlands, Portugal

7. WWW.CHRODIS.EU Analysis of country reports (guiding questions) Landscape: policies, structures, available resources; similar but different complexity and level of specificity of policies; and in available resources Health inequalities – 2 country reports and healthy and active ageing – 7 country reports

8. WWW.CHRODIS.EU Analysis of country reports (guiding questions) Good practices approaches – similarities or not; 9 country reports have criteria, different approaches 3 reported databases; Health forecasting studies – 8 country reports, different approaches and methodologies;

9. WWW.CHRODIS.EU Analysis of country reports (guiding questions) Information on cost-effectiveness studies in 9 country reviews, different approaches and methodologies

10. WWW.CHRODIS.EU Analysis of country reports (guiding questions) Gaps and needs – areas for exchange and potential support Approaches in good practice criteria, methodology and use for cost-effectiveness and forecasting, use of available resources, innovative financing sources