Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

PANDA GSI 13. December 2006 PID TAG Georg Schepers PANDA Technical Assessment Group PID Status Report G. Schepers for the PID TAG GSI PID TAG.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "PANDA GSI 13. December 2006 PID TAG Georg Schepers PANDA Technical Assessment Group PID Status Report G. Schepers for the PID TAG GSI PID TAG."— Presentation transcript:

1 PANDA Meeting @ GSI 13. December 2006 PID TAG Georg Schepers PANDA Technical Assessment Group PID Status Report G. Schepers for the PID TAG GSI PID TAG http://wiki.gsi.de/cgi-bin/viewauth/Pandatagpid

2 PANDA Meeting @ GSI 13. December 2006 PID TAG Georg Schepers PID @ PANDA PANDA @ FAIR Global Requirements for PID PID TAG work - Kinematic Studies - Performance – Separation Power - Efficiency - Global PID analysis Conclusion and Outlook GSI PID TAG

3 PANDA Meeting @ GSI 13. December 2006 TAG-PID Georg Schepers pp- and pA-annihilation GSI PANDA @ FAIR wide range of momentum - p momentum: 1.5-15 GeV/c - mass range: 0-6 GeV/c highest intensity - event rate 2 x 10 /s - up to 10 reaction products rich physics program 7 2

4 PANDA Meeting @ GSI 13. December 2006 TAG-PID Georg Schepers PANDA (PID) Detectors GSI PID TAG

5 PANDA Meeting @ GSI 13. December 2006 PID TAG Georg Schepers Subject - Requirements from physics - Evaluate potential of each subsystem - Matching of systems Deliverables - Definition of global PID scheme - Optimized set of detectors and parameters Time Frame - One year from asap ( PANDA Meeting @ DD 9.March 2006) GSI Global PID Requirements

6 PANDA Meeting @ GSI 13. December 2006 Georg Schepers PANDA Technical Assessment Group PID actual C. Schwarz, G. SchepersChair B. Kopf/ R. NowotnyBarrel Calorimeter R. Kaiser / B. Seitz Forward Cherenkov O. Denisov / M. P. Bussa / M. MaggioraMuon counter K. Föhl / P. Vlasov / M.Ehrenfried/ B.Seitz Cherenkov Counter J. Smyrski / P. Hawranek / O. WronskaForward Calorimeter Q. Weitzel / B. Ketzer / S. NeubertTPC (Carsten Schwarz /Aida Galoyan )ToF K. PetersDetectors GSI PID TAG

7 PANDA Meeting @ GSI 13. December 2006 TAG-PID Georg Schepers GSI PID TAG Work

8 PANDA Meeting @ GSI 13. December 2006 TAG-PID Georg Schepers GSI Kinematics of the PANDA decay channels Important input for common plots for Separation Power Solving open questions: - which quality for separation power do we need for different spatial regions ? - do we need a Forward Cherenkov ? MC truth studies for the PID - distinction between the different particles IDs - distinction between different momentum regions : < 1 GeV/c : PID via dE/dx and/or ToF (and TPC) > 1 GeV/c : PID via Cherenkov detectors - distinction between different spatial regions θ : 0° - 5° : FS- θ : 0° - 5° : Forward Spectrometer (FS) θ : 5° - 20° : forward part of the Target Spectrometer (TS) θ : 20° - 90° : forward part of the barrel region in the TS θ : 90° - 170° : backward part of the barrel region in the TS

9 PANDA Meeting @ GSI 13. December 2006 TAG-PID Georg Schepers GSI Kinematics of the PANDA decay channels DPM @ 2.0 GeV/cDPM @ 15.0 GeV/c

10 PANDA Meeting @ GSI 13. December 2006 TAG-PID Georg Schepers Do we need a Forward Cherenkov? GSI PID TAG

11 PANDA Meeting @ GSI 13. December 2006 TAG-PID Georg Schepers Forward Cherenkov GSI PID TAG Forward RICH angles: 0-5/10deg pions: 0.5 - 16 GeV/c kaons: 2 - 16 GeV/c protons: 2 - 20 GeV/c thickness 1.2m =~ 0.11 Xo

12 PANDA Meeting @ GSI 13. December 2006 PID TAG Georg Schepers Endcap DIRC 6 Parameter Analysis Endcap DIRC GSI Performance – Separation Power - Efficiency K – π - Separation Power: σ - lines as function of θ and p 1 2 3 4

13 PANDA Meeting @ GSI 13. December 2006 TAG-PID Georg Schepers Performance – Separation Power - Efficiency Example : Endcap DIRC GSI Distribution and Resolution of β Separation Power ( θ, p) Efficiency K π

14 PANDA Meeting @ GSI 13. December 2006 PID TAG Georg Schepers GSI Barrel DIRC Pin hole Focussing DIRC Time Of Propagation 3D DIRC

15 PANDA Meeting @ GSI 13. December 2006 PID TAG Georg Schepers GSI DIRC Parametrization Separation Power = l m1²-m2² l / (2 p² σ-track(θ) sqrt(n*n-1)) Path length [cm]Photons produced Separation Power vs p vs θ pθ θ θ p p Efficiency p θ θ p p

16 PANDA Meeting @ GSI 13. December 2006 TAG-PID Georg Schepers GSITPC

17 PANDA Meeting @ GSI 13. December 2006 TAG-PID Georg Schepers TPC Parametrization dE/dx GSITAG-PID Seperation Power = 2 l I1-I2 l / (sigmaI1/I1 + sigmaI2/I2) I is dE/dx of the resp. particle. (resolution 5%)

18 PANDA Meeting @ GSI 13. December 2006 TAG-PID Georg Schepers GSI (Barrel) EMC electron ID Studies Full simulation chain in BaBar like software - G4 simulation with the complete detector, digitization, full reconstruction for the EMC - single particles between 0.05 … 6.0 GeV/c and cos(  ) =  -0.7 … 0.7 - 10k e + - 10k  + Electron can be identified via - E/p (E: energy deposit of the cluster; p: reconstructed momentum of the track) - shower shape of the cluster Studies based on - complete EMC reconstruction - reconstructed energy deposit of the cluster - reconstructed shower shape of the cluster (Zernike moments) - events with only one cluster - tracking not taken into account yet

19 PANDA Meeting @ GSI 13. December 2006 TAG-PID Georg Schepers GSI (Barrel) EMC electron ID Studies – Training Neuronal Network e π Κ + + + eπΚeπΚ ++++++

20 PANDA Meeting @ GSI 13. December 2006 TAG-PID Georg Schepers GSI (Barrel) EMC electron ID Studies – Results e+e+ ++ e+e+ ++ all cut Κ+Κ+

21 PANDA Meeting @ GSI 13. December 2006 TAG-PID Georg Schepers GSI (Barrel) EMC electron ID Studies – Results

22 PANDA Meeting @ GSI 13. December 2006 TAG-PID Georg Schepers GSI (Barrel) EMC electron ID Studies - Outlook Electron ID via e/p and shower shape seems to work PID for p < 0.8 GeV/c to be improved need of precise test beam data and Monte Carlo models optimal training of the neuronal network necessary combination with other detectors (e.g. dE/dx, tof, cherenkov) studies with different crystal sizes

23 PANDA Meeting @ GSI 13. December 2006 PID TAG Georg Schepers GSI Forward Calorimeter Up 5 GeV/c down 1 GeV/c The Forward EMC can be treated in the same way as the Barrel EMC The groups from Bochum and Crocow work already on common simulations

24 PANDA Meeting @ GSI 13. December 2006 PID TAG Georg Schepers GSI Forward Calorimeter Objectives of the Shashlyk Calorimeter π/e discrimination energy, position and time measurement TPR Layout of a Shashlyk module 100 ps / sqrt(E)Time resolution 4.% / sqrt(E)Energy resolution 110 x 110 mm 2 Lateral dimensions 20 X 0 Radiation depth 59.8 mmEffective Moliere radius 0.275 mmLead layer thickness 1.5 mmScintillator layer thickness 378Number of layers

25 PANDA Meeting @ GSI 13. December 2006 PID-TAG Georg Schepers GSI Barrel ToF

26 PANDA Meeting @ GSI 13. December 2006 PID-TAG Georg Schepers Muon Counters GSIPID-TAG Different Strategies for muon identification in different momentum regions must be envisaged for muon detectors only out side the iron yoke: E mu < 1GeV : muons can not reach the muon trackers => identification Barrel DIRC, Barrel EMC E mu > 1 GeV : identification feasible by means of muon trackers (gaseous detectors) Basic detector features The bacis detector features for the muon trackers will be: Ar, CO2, CF4Gas mixture 25 nsecDouble hit resolution 100 nsecMaximal drift time 1 cmSingle plane space resolution (pitch size) 2-4 nsec Time resolution

27 Layer # 27 Layer # 7 PANDA Meeting @ GSI 13. December 2006 PID-TAG Georg Schepers Muon Counters GSIPID-TAG

28 PANDA Meeting @ GSI 13. December 2006 PID-TAG Georg Schepers Global PID Analysis GSIPID-TAG Evaluation for Global PID analysis for PANDA already started - number of PID variables ? - number of PID stages ? - combinations of detectors… Approches - Maximum Likelihood - method from other experiments compared (HERMES, Belle) First Conclusions taken: - Need of probability functions from test beam and simulations from all PID detectors and some traking input (e.g. p, θ) - Likelihood approach seems to be flexible enough - Analysis with Neuronal network interesting either as Global PID Analysis or as input for Likelihood method

29 PANDA Meeting @ GSI 13. December 2006 PID-TAG Georg Schepers GSI Conclusion for the PID TAG Separation Power parametrization and Efficiency determination prepared for some detectors for the others in progress Kinematic Plots for Benchmak channels available - background studies has to be done Questions : - Forward Cherenkov - positiv - TPC helpful as PID detector especially in low mommenta regions Concepts for Global PID Analysis under evaluation

30 PANDA Meeting @ GSI 13. December 2006 PID-TAG Georg Schepers GSI Outlook Next Steps: Need of precise detector tests and elaborated MC methods Need the Matching of - detector response functions - PID detectors with output from the tracking detectors

31 PANDA Meeting @ GSI 13. December 2006 TAG-PID Georg Schepers C. Schwarz, G. SchepersChair B. Kopf/ R. NowotnyBarrel Calorimeter R. Kaiser / B. Seitz Forward Cherenkov O. Denisov / M. P. Bussa / M. MaggioraMuon counter K. Föhl / P. Vlasov / M. EhrenfriedCherenkov Counter J. Smyrski / P. Hawranek / O. WronskaForward Calorimeter Q. Weitzel / B. Ketzer / S. NeubertTPC (Carsten Schwarz/Aida Galoyan )ToF K. PetersDetectors Thanks for important input: M. Düren, K. Götzen, Th. Hennino a.o. GSI PANDA Technical Assessment Group PID


Download ppt "PANDA GSI 13. December 2006 PID TAG Georg Schepers PANDA Technical Assessment Group PID Status Report G. Schepers for the PID TAG GSI PID TAG."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google