Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Updates from the Field National Alternative Education & Accountability Policy Review Facilitated by Nelson Smith, National Association of Charter School.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Updates from the Field National Alternative Education & Accountability Policy Review Facilitated by Nelson Smith, National Association of Charter School."— Presentation transcript:

1 Updates from the Field National Alternative Education & Accountability Policy Review Facilitated by Nelson Smith, National Association of Charter School Authorizers Jody Ernst, Momentum Strategy & Research

2 All 50 States’ Policies Reviewed for: 1.How alternative options are defined 2.How “high-risk” students are defined 3.How alternative options are held accountable for student outcomes

3 How Alternative Options are Defined 41 states have statutes and/or regulations that specifically define alternative options  Schools only (12 states)  Programs only (14 states)  Both Schools and programs (15 states)

4 How High Risk Students are Defined Eligible Students# of States Poor Academics (e.g., retained, poor test results, academic failure, behind grade level) 21 Chronic suspensions and/or expulsions20 Prior dropouts, out of school for extended period17 Pregnant/ Parenting Teens15 Problem/Disruptive Behaviors14 Poor, inconsistent attendance/ Chronic Truancy13 Credit deficient/ over-aged and under-credited10 Alcohol or substance issues9 Adjudicated youth/court involvement8 Experienced major trauma, abuse, neglect8 Homeless7 English language learners7 In the foster system/ wards of the court6 Free & reduced meal eligibility6 Parent Characteristics (alcohol, drug abuse, incarceration, etc.)5 Special Education Students (on IEP)5 Green text indicates Support by NACSA AEC Accountability Taskforce

5 Percent of Students Needed to Meet Criteria Other states’ ELIGIBILITY criteria: -Colorado: 95% -South Carolina: 85% -Texas, Nevada: 75% -Arizona and California: 70% -Ohio: 51%* -New Mexico: 20% Of the 41 states with codified definitions for alternative education options eight have a minimum threshold for the proportion of students needed to qualify as an alternative school. Being reevaluated Adopted in last 2 years Tried to move to 75% but was vetoed *Ohio merely states a majority must be prior dropouts.

6 How Alternative Options are Held Accountable Alternative Options Specified Components of Alt Accountability Schools Only (12 states) Programs Only (14 states) Both Schools & Programs (15 States) Alternative accountability present9 states3 states4 states Different weighting of indicators and/or measures4 states0 states2 states Different measures than traditional framework4 states3 states2 states Different benchmarks/comparison groups6 states0 states2 states Emphasis on growth3 states0 states Customizable at school level2 states0 states1 states

7 Takeaways A lot is going on in this area of alternative education – More states are implementing policies that define alternative options – Some states are re-evaluating definitions as well as accountability for alternative schools – There is not a lot consistency in the definitions of alternative options, nor how to hold them accountable

8 WHAT’S GOING ON IN YOUR NECK OF THE WOODS? Discussion time


Download ppt "Updates from the Field National Alternative Education & Accountability Policy Review Facilitated by Nelson Smith, National Association of Charter School."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google