1. Summary of Services for the MC Production Patricia Méndez Lorenzo WLCG T2 Workshop CERN, 12 th June 2006

2. Patricia Méndez Lorenzo WLCG T2 Workshop 12 th June 2006 Outline  Main Purpose  Present the T2 infrastructure required by each experiment at the sites  Content of the talk  Summary of the T2 activities experiment by experiment  T1-T2 association  Each experiment has provided different information  Not following therefore a similar structure for each experiment during this talk  It tries to be a initial “draft” to be completed after the session

3. Patricia Méndez Lorenzo WLCG T2 Workshop 12 th June 2006 3 ALICE: Generalities  Distribution of tasks per Tiers in the ALICE computing model  T2 is responsible for MC simulation and analysis  Difference between T1 and T2 for ALICE is only QoS

4. Patricia Méndez Lorenzo WLCG T2 Workshop 12 th June 2006 4 ALICE: MC Production on T2`s  Production extensively tested in 2 data challenges: PDC’05 and the ongoing PDC’06  Standard setup – LCG/gLite with an ALICE VOBOX (as on the T1s)  Distributed at all T1`s and T2`s  At WMS level they are at the same level  All job submission to T2s is through the Grid:  Installation of application software, including simulation packages is handled through the ALICE Grid tools  Produced MC data are stored on the local SE and transferred for safekeeping to the host T1

5. Patricia Méndez Lorenzo WLCG T2 Workshop 12 th June 2006 5 ALICE: Specific T2 Requirements  Large amount of memory consumption per job: 2 GB max  Job duration - typically 8 KSI2k hours  Input Data - minimal set of configuration  Output Data - up to 1.5 GB/job, standard 300 MB  The jobs are (naturally) CPU-intensive, no stringent requirement on storage

6. Patricia Méndez Lorenzo WLCG T2 Workshop 12 th June 2006 6 ALICE: PDC`06 tests of T2  Generally, ALICE is doing tests of all elements of the computing model  The MC production - ongoing  In July 2006, T2-T1 transfers (FTS) tests  Relational matrix T2-host T1 is being built  Installation of FTS client infrastructure is ongoing

7. Patricia Méndez Lorenzo WLCG T2 Workshop 12 th June 2006 7 ALICE: T1-T2 relations  In the ALICE computing model there are not privileged relations among T1`s and T2`s  Both types of sites hold VOBOXES  Both types of sites hold local LFC  Relations T1-T2 are based in terms of storage and transfers  MC data and AOD from analysis at T2 shipped to the closest T1 for custodial purposes  In countries with a T1, T2`s are the country to refer  France, Germany and Italy  In countries with no T1, this role should be played by the site with the best bandwidth

8. Patricia Méndez Lorenzo WLCG T2 Workshop 12 th June 2006 8 ATLAS: Generalities  Main Activities to perform in the T2`s  Run the data simulation  Hold AOD (in disk for analysis) generated at T0 and distributed among T1 and T2  Run the user analysis jobs  ATLAS consider a hierarchical structure between T1`s and T2`s  Defined by the generation and distribution of data  Associated to the baseline services required for their production

9. Patricia Méndez Lorenzo WLCG T2 Workshop 12 th June 2006 9 ATLAS: Distribution of Data  RAW data (T0)  T1: Part of raw data, fraction of ESD and full set of AOD  Nominal AOD data rate: 20MB/s  T2: Receive also AOD from T1`s  Large T2`s storing full sets of AOD`s  Small T2`s sharing full sets  Reprocessing of raw data (T1)  Production of ESD to exchange between T1`s  AOD to distribute to other T1`s and T2`s  Expected a 20MB/s to T2`s  Simulation (T2)  Data transferred to T1`s for ist permanent storage  Low upload from T2 to T1 (few MB/s)

10. Patricia Méndez Lorenzo WLCG T2 Workshop 12 th June 2006 10 ATLAS: Baseline Services  Baseline Services to build the ATLAS infrastructure  FTS and LFC  The ATLAS DDM uses these blocks to define a hierarchical and distributed data cataloging  Central dataset catalogues: Information of datasets and location  Local File catalogues: Mapping PFN vs LFN  FTS and LFC managed by T1`s  Each T1 provides services to a certain group of T2`s  Defining regions consisting in each T1 and associated T2`s

11. Patricia Méndez Lorenzo WLCG T2 Workshop 12 th June 2006 11 ATLAS: Definition of regions  Each T1 will group a certain set of T2`s where to download AODs and upload simulated data  Fast and reliable network required  T1 holds the local LFC`s and contains the entries of those files storaged in the T2`s  Fast communication between running jobs at T2 and local catalogue at T1  Geographically closed  Matching of CPU capability of the T2 and Storage power of the T1  Large countries will provide matching capacities between T1 and T2  Small countries will provide either T1 or T2  Handling the problems  Fast human connections (not 12 hours of difference)

12. Patricia Méndez Lorenzo WLCG T2 Workshop 12 th June 2006 12 List of Services required at T2 during SC4  Not particular requirements besides a SRM based SE  General services provided by the Grid infrastructure, CE, SE...  FTS to be set at T1`s  Nominal rate to T2: 20MB/s during 24 h  Expertise in SE installation and maintenance

13. Patricia Méndez Lorenzo WLCG T2 Workshop 12 th June 2006 13 CMS: Simulation Production at T2  Simulation Production  Generation Phase  Small input configuration file, large output dataset  High CPU activity  Simulation, reconstruction  New iterations  Set of input data and production of output data  More similar to analysis  I/O activities included  Simulation at T2  Produced data defined by the physics groups  Individual user productions also foreseen  Transparent for the T2

14. Patricia Méndez Lorenzo WLCG T2 Workshop 12 th June 2006 14 CMS: Simulation Procedure  Workflow  Jobs submitted centrally using a set of automatic tools  Central request queue: Production Manager  Management of jobs by the Production Agents  Human support for possible failures is needed  Dataflow  Simulated data stored at T1  Backup on tape  Reprocessing and distribution to other T2 maybe needed  T2 WNs stored the output locally  For validation purposes  Marge of files locally (I/O operations)

15. Patricia Méndez Lorenzo WLCG T2 Workshop 12 th June 2006 15 CMS: Requirements  T2 will provide disk and CPU to perform the simulation and the majority of the analysis  CMS requires:  Good behavior: Pass all SFT  Good and solid batch farm  Good storage: size, performance and services  SRM access  FTS channels  The server is placed at T1 but the good transfer is the responsibility of the two ends  Good I/O  Good network  1Gbit/s for data movement  Fast local access for read/write

16. Patricia Méndez Lorenzo WLCG T2 Workshop 12 th June 2006 16 CMS:Services  CMS Services  CMS software distribution  Integration of LFC and PhEDEx (on top of FTS) in the Data Management system  Tasks of the T2`s  The good behavior of the site is its tasks  Good management of the jobs and fixing the SW area cannot be done by the experiment  Active and responsible T2 is wished  Good communication with the experiment is fundamental

17. Patricia Méndez Lorenzo WLCG T2 Workshop 12 th June 2006 17 LHCb: Generalities  T0  Generation of raw data, reconstruction, stripping and user analysis  T1  Besides real data taking, similar tasks as T0  T2  Monte Carlo production (no analysis phase)  At least in countries also providing T1  T2 are considered PC-farms with a small disk buffer  Disk used as temporary cache until data are transferred to T1  Full copy also at CERN

18. Patricia Méndez Lorenzo WLCG T2 Workshop 12 th June 2006 18 LHCb: Analysis at T1  The LHCb analysis jobs consist in selecting the events stored at T1 and focus on a particular channel of analysis  Typical analysis jobs run on a 10 6 event sample  Some analysis jobs will run even larger event samples (10 7 )  The analysis input is completely stored at each T1  The output can be processed in smaller sites  To perform the analysis at the T1 seems to be faster and less expensive in terms of hardware, infrastructure and staff resources than running it at T2`s

19. Patricia Méndez Lorenzo WLCG T2 Workshop 12 th June 2006 19 LHCb: T2 Requirements  In terms of software  Well known functionality since they only perform MC production  CE, SE, RB, GPBOX (policy enforcement mechanism)  T2 are not technically critical in LHCb  They only have to produce the required amount of MC data  In terms of support  Fundamental a good performance of the T1  Need of dedicated personnel cannot be set aside  Infrastructural and organizational problems must be solved

20. Patricia Méndez Lorenzo WLCG T2 Workshop 12 th June 2006 20 T1-T2 Association  During the Rome GDB it was asked to the experiments to provide the T2-T1 relationships  Here we have the (in some cases) tentative table  It is still an open question for some sites and an issue to be solved

21. Patricia Méndez Lorenzo WLCG T2 Workshop 12 th June 2006 21 ALICE  CCIN2P3  French T2, Sejong (Korea), Lyon T2, Madrid (Spain)  CERN  Capa Town (South Africa), Kolkata (India), T2 Federation (Romania), RMKI (Hungary), Athens (Greece), Slovakia, T2 Federation (Poland), Wuhan (China)  FZK  FZU (Czech Republic), RDIG (Russia), GSI and Muenster (Germany)  CNAF  Tier2 Federation  RAL  Birmingham  SARA/NIKHEF  PDSF  Houston

22. Patricia Méndez Lorenzo WLCG T2 Workshop 12 th June 2006 22 ATLAS  BNL  USA T2 Federation  TRIUMF  Canada T2 Federation  NDGF  Ljubljana  PIC  Spanish T2 Federation  Portuguese Federation  RAL  T2 in UK  CNAF  T2 in Italy

23. Patricia Méndez Lorenzo WLCG T2 Workshop 12 th June 2006 23 ATLAS (cont.)  CCIN2P3  T2 in France  Romanian Federation  Alternative data path for Beijing  Alternative data path for Tokyo  ASGC  Melbourne  Beijing  Tokyo  NIKHEF  Russian Federation  Israeli Federation  Alternative path for NorthGrid and Prague

24. Patricia Méndez Lorenzo WLCG T2 Workshop 12 th June 2006 24 CMS  CCIN2P3  Belgium  T2 France  FZK  German T2  Poland  Russia  Switzerland  CNAF  Greece  Hungary  Italian T2  PIC  Portugal T2  Spain T2

25. Patricia Méndez Lorenzo WLCG T2 Workshop 12 th June 2006 25 CMS (cont.)  ASCC  India  Korea  Pakistan  Taiwan  RAL  Estonia  T2 UK  FNAL  Brazil  US  China, Croatia, Finland to be confirmed

26. Patricia Méndez Lorenzo WLCG T2 Workshop 12 th June 2006 26 LHCb  T2 mapped to CERN and T1  CNAF  Italian T2  RAL  UK T2  PIC  Spain T2  FZK  German T2  Poland  Switzerland  CERN  Russia  CCIN2P3  France T2, Bulgaria + west of meridian line  NIKHEF  Nederlands + east of meridian line

27. Patricia Méndez Lorenzo WLCG T2 Workshop 12 th June 2006 27 Summary  All the experiments will run the MC production in the T2  Apart of LHCb, all of them will also run the analysis  CMS foreseen an important I/O activity  Data will always be transferred to T1 for storing  All experiments are requiring good catalogues and transfers services  ALICE puts in this sense the T2 performance to the T1 level  ATLAS defines a more hierarchical structure  The responsibility of the corresponding T1 is fundamental  The association T1-T2 should be clarify as soon as possible on those countries with no T1