Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byClyde Elliott Modified over 9 years ago
1
Chapter 11
2
The general plan for carrying out a study where the independent variable is changed Determines the internal validity Should provide for limited differences between control and experimental groups
3
Controlling threats to internal validity ◦ Preexperimental ◦ Quasi-experimental ◦ Experimental Number of independent variables ◦ Single variable – one manipulated IV ◦ Factorial – two or more IVs & at lease one IV is manipulated
4
One group pretest-posttest ◦ Give a pretest that measures the DV ◦ Administer the treatment ◦ Give a posttest that measures the DV ◦ Compare the pretest score to the posttest score ◦ Validity concerns History Maturation Instrumentation Regression
5
Static group comparison ◦ Uses 2 or more preexisting intact or static groups ◦ One is exposed to the treatment ◦ The posttest is administered to both groups and the results compared ◦ Validity concerns Non randomization – can’t generalize Selection bias Maturation Mortality
6
Nonrandomized control group (pre-post) Counterbalanced design Time-series with one group Time-series with a control group
7
Select two or more intact groups Use similar groups Randomly assign groups as experimental and control Give pretest to both groups Administer the treatment Give posttest to both groups Compare the test results and analyze Validity concerns ◦ Selection bias can be controlled with the pretest and ANCOVA ◦ Interaction of selection and maturation, regression or instrumentation
8
Something in the selection process that causes one group to possess a higher or lower level of maturity ◦ Asking for volunteers
9
May occur if each group represented a different population ANCOVA with the pretest scores as the covariate is the best way to analyze
10
Ceiling effect of tests could cause students with high scores on the pretest to show little improvement students with lower scores on the pretest to show more improvement ANCOVA with the pretest scores as the covariate is the best way to analyze
11
Uses intact groups Groups rotate positions Contains a series of replications Use when several treatments need to be studied Rotation helps remove differences between groups. Experimental Treatments ReplicationX1X2X3 1Grp 1Grp 2Grp 3 2Grp 2Grp 3Grp 1 3Grp 3Grp 1Grp 2 Col. Mean
12
Periodic measurement on one group Introduces a treatment at some time period Looking for changes in the pattern when treatment is added X
13
Validity concerns ◦ History Strengths-repeated measures help rule out these threats if they don’t cause fluxuations ◦ Maturation ◦ Testing ◦ regression
14
Contains a control and experimental group Helps control history effect Can have multiple control and experimental groups
15
Randomized Subjects, Posttest-Only Control Group Randomized Matched Subjects, Posttest-Only Control Group Randomized Subjects, Pretest-Posttest Control Group Solomon Three-Group Solomon Four-Group Simple Factoral
16
Randomly assign participants to groups(30 or more per group) Give experimental group the treatment Measure both on the dependent variable All other variables are held constant Uses randomization and a control group to control the threats to internal validity Randomization ensures that initial differences between groups are due to chance Controls for history, maturation, regression, pretesting
17
Use for ◦ Studying changing attitudes ◦ Where pretests are not appropriate or available ◦ Can include more that 2 groups Possible threats are subject effects and experimenter effects Mortality could be a threat because there is no pretest to know if those that dropout are different from those that stay Can’t be used to measure change
18
Similar to previous design Uses a matching procedure to create equivalent groups ◦ Matching variables should correlate to DV ◦ Matched pair must be randomly assigned one to the E group and one to the C. ◦ Could use a pretest in this model ◦ This procedure is useful for small groups (<30) Threats to validity same as previous design
19
Randomly assign participants to the experimental and control groups Give a pretest on the DV to both groups Administer the treatment to the experimental group Give a posttest on the DV to both groups Compare the pre and post test results using a t- test or F-test ANCOVA is preferred statistic Internal validity threat– test sensitizing Main concern is with external validity involving interaction between the pretest and treatment.
20
Use 3 groups Random assignment Same as randomized pretest-posttest, control group Has second control group ◦ Not pretested ◦ Exposed to treatment Compares all three posttest scores Both control groups should be similar unless there is test sensitizing
21
Use 4 groups Random assignment Same as randomized pretest-posttest, control group Has third control group ◦ Not pretested ◦ Not Exposed to treatment Compares all four posttest scores Two groups take the pretest and two do not Treatment is given to one pretest group and one none pretested group Both control groups should be similar unless there is test sensitizing Drawback is difficult to conduct and time consuming Compare the posttests using ANOVA
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.