1. nh-j-lorri-2-jupiter-v2.0 nh-j-lorri-3-jupiter-v2.0 nh-x-lorri-2-launch-v2.0 nh-x-lorri-3-launch-v2.0 Matthew Knight PDS review 8/19/14

2. Overview Overall dataset is more user friendly than the previous version I reviewed (January) I found introdoc.pdf very useful Positions of the object in images is a big help –May want to clarify in dataset.cat that “location in line and sample” means “rows and columns” or “y and x” Important sections of SOC extracted as separate PDFs in document/ directory make it easier to find specific info about LORRI Document/seq_*tab file has more detailed information about targets (not sure if intentional, but it is useful)

3. nh-x-lorri-2-launch-v2.0/ Are positions and target information in this dataset? I spot checked for Jupiter and Pluto images and never found this information

4. nh-x-lorri-2-launch-v2.0/ Are positions and target information in this dataset? I spot checked for Jupiter and Pluto images and never found this information

5. nh-x-lorri-3-launch-v2.0/ Are positions and target information in this dataset? I spot checked for Jupiter and Pluto images and never found this information Image is calibrated nicely :)

6. nh-j-lorri-2-jupiter-v2.0, nh-j-lorri-3-jupiter-v2.0 Positions and target information correct in these datasets

7. nh-j-lorri-2-jupiter-v2.0, nh-j-lorri-3-jupiter-v2.0 Positions and target information correct in these datasets

8. Introdoc.pdf typos Instrument and Operations section, 3rd par: –Line 2: “developed” seems unnecessary? –Line 5: “!25-30” –Line 7: “or the nominal” -> “for the nominal”? Instrument and Operations section, 7th par: –Line 2: “raw pixel values (Data Numbers; DNs) theoretically range” -> “raw pixel values’ (Data Numbers; DNs) theoretical range”

9. Dataset.cat typos ABSTRACT_DESC: “This is VERSION of this data set” –Should there be a version number? –Also like this later in the document (lines 189, 205, 301) “LORRI updates for Data Sets V2.0”, first CAVEAT: “These were trivially derived from other information in the labels i.e. the project was doing the user’s work for them” –I find this commentary snide and unnecessary “Caveats about TARGET and observational intent”, first par: –Line 6: was “meta-data data” intentional? –Line 7: “unpredicatable”

10. Misc Catalog/nh.cat, 2nd par of “Mission phases” has weird line wraps Document/docinfo.txt –Should files be alphabetical? –nh_mission_trajectory not listed?