1. 1 如何評價網站

2. 為何需鑑別網站？  The Internet has everything?  網際網路擁有一切東西？還是擁有許多東西？  所有資料都是有用的嗎？一切是真實的？  如何分辨網站的好壞？  正確的網站可幫助我們探索知識的真相，不好的網站提供假情報 ，誤導探索方向 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVIG-Nsxi_A

3. Is it clear who is responsible for the contents of the page? Is there a link to a page describing the purpose of the sponsoring organization? Is there a way of verifying the legitimacy of the page's sponsor? That is, is there a phone number or postal address to contact for more information? (Simply an email address is not enough). Is it clear who wrote the material and are the author's qualifications for writing on this topic clearly stated? If the material is protected by copyright, is the name of the copyright holder given? Is it clear who is responsible for the contents of the page? Is there a link to a page describing the purpose of the sponsoring organization? Is there a way of verifying the legitimacy of the page's sponsor? That is, is there a phone number or postal address to contact for more information? (Simply an email address is not enough). Is it clear who wrote the material and are the author's qualifications for writing on this topic clearly stated? If the material is protected by copyright, is the name of the copyright holder given? 評價網站的標準 (Cooke 1999, Alexander and Tate 1999)  Authority 權威  Accuracy  Objectivity  Currency  Coverage

4. 4 Are the sources for any factual information clearly listed? Is the information free from grammatical, spelling, and other typographical errors? (These kinds of errors not only indicate a lack of quality control, but can actually produce inaccuracies in information). Is it clear who has the ultimate responsibility for the accuracy of the content of the material? If there are charts and/or graphs containing statistical data, are the charts and/or graphs clearly labeled and easy to read? Are the sources for any factual information clearly listed? Is the information free from grammatical, spelling, and other typographical errors? (These kinds of errors not only indicate a lack of quality control, but can actually produce inaccuracies in information). Is it clear who has the ultimate responsibility for the accuracy of the content of the material? If there are charts and/or graphs containing statistical data, are the charts and/or graphs clearly labeled and easy to read? 評價網站的標準 (Cooke 1999, Alexander and Tate 1999)  Authority  Accuracy 正確性  Objectivity  Currency  Coverage

5. 5 Is the information provided as a public service? Is the information free of advertising? If there is any advertising on the page, is it clearly differentiated from the informational content? 評價網站的標準 (Cooke 1999, Alexander and Tate 1999)  Authority  Accuracy  Objectivity 客觀性  Currency  Coverage

6. 6 評價網站的標準 (Cooke 1999, Alexander and Tate 1999)  Authority  Accuracy  Objectivity  Currency 流通性  Coverage Are there dates on the page indicating when the page was written? when the page was first placed on the Web? when the page was last revised? Are there any other indications that the material is kept current? If material is presented in graphs and/or charts, is it clearly stated when the data were gathered? If the information is published in different editions, is it clearly labeled what edition the page is from? If the material is from a work which is out of copyright (as is often the case with a dictionary or thesaurus), has there been an effort to update the material to make it more current?

7. 7 Is there an indication that the page has been completed, and is not still under construction? If the page is still under construction, is the expected date of completion indicated? If there is a print-equivalent to the Web page, is there a clear indication of whether the entire work is available on the Web or only parts of it? Is the intended audience for the material clear? 評價網站的標準 (Cooke 1999, Alexander and Tate 1999)  Authority  Accuracy  Objectivity  Currency  Coverage (and intended audience) 覆蓋

8. 8 其他標準 (Bodomo 2002)  Evidence of patronage  How many ‘customers’ patronize a website  Evidence of collaboration/corroboration  Whether the author(s) collaborate(s) with other linguists and language experts in that area of language and linguistics  Multilingual retrievability  Related to online dictionaries/glossaries

9. 網站範例 9

10. 5W 原則  WHO: Author of your Web site  Is it by a famous, well-respected organization like UC Berkeley, or the US Government?  Web sites that have good authors do not try to hide this fact. Beware of Web sites that don't let you know who has written them or what their qualifications are!  Look at the URL (address) to get more information about the authors of your Web site.  Web sites from universities end with.edu. US Government sites end with.gov. Personal or company web sites usually end in.com. Organizations usually end in.org. 10

11. 5W 原則  WHEN: Look at the date of your Web site.  When was the Web site created? Does the Web site say when it was last updated? Is the information old or new?  Are the links to other sites still working? If not, you can guess that the author is not working on this Web page anymore and the rest of the information might be out of date. 11

12. 5W 原則  WHAT: What is the goal of the Web site?  What is the viewpoint? Is it to give people facts, or is it trying to sell something?  Is the Web site made to inform? Is it made to persuade? Or is it made to make you laugh?  Sometimes Web authors make sites with completely incorrect information as a joke!  Many Web sites are trying to sell you a trip to the Bahamas, or some new medicine.  Is the Web site you're looking at made to help people do research or talk them into buying something? 12

13. 5W 原則  WHERE: Where does the information come from?  Most authors of good Web sites will tell you where they got their information. Did they do their own research? Did they read books, magazines or newspapers? Do they give you a bibliography (list) of the sources they used?  Is the Web site written by an organization that is famous for their research (like a medical school or a science organization)?  Beware of authors that don't tell you where they got their information. 13

14. 5W 原則  WHY: Why is this information useful to you?  Does it answer your questions?  Does it help you write your report? Or is the information not really related to your research?  The best information in the world is not useful if it doesn't answer your questions. Maybe you need to look for another site that discusses what you are looking for. 14

15. 小結  評價網站的原則  Authority 、 Accuracy 、 Objectivity 、 Currency 、 Coverage  5W 原則  Who 、 When 、 What 、 Where 、 Why  能分辨政府機關、公司、組織或學校的網域 .gov 、.com 、.org 、.edu 等 15