2. BAIRWMP Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan http://bairwmp.org/ http://bairwmp.org/ Background/History Background/History Prop 50 2002-2006 Prop 50 2002-2006 - Prop 84 changes (2006) - Prop 84 changes (2006) Bay area actions Bay area actions Plan Update and Projects Plan Update and Projects Opportunities/ challenges Opportunities/ challenges

3. Background/History Prop 50 Prop 50 -2006 BAIRWMP -Prop 50 Implementation grant -Plan development and Functional Areas Prop 84 Prop 84 - Regional Acceptance Process - Sub-regions and target allocations - Project prioritization Prop 84 Implementation Grants Prop 84 Implementation Grants

4. Integrated Regional Water Management Planning http://www.water.ca.gov/irwm/ Required By State for certain funding under Prop 50-passed in 2002 – $3.4 billion Total Required By State for certain funding under Prop 50-passed in 2002 – $3.4 billion Total -$ 500 million for IRWM Required Plan or “functional equivalent” to be adopted in order to receive Implementation funds Required Plan or “functional equivalent” to be adopted in order to receive Implementation funds

5. 2006 BAIRWMP Regional Group Regional Group Region Description Region Description Objectives Objectives Water Management Strategies Water Management Strategies Integration Integration Regional Priorities Regional Priorities Implementation Implementation Impacts and Benefits Impacts and Benefits Technical Analysis & Plan Performance Technical Analysis & Plan Performance Data Management Data Management Financing Financing Statewide Priorities Statewide Priorities Relation to Local Planning Relation to Local Planning Stakeholder Involvement Stakeholder Involvement Coordination Coordination

6. Prop 50 Grant Grant received-Prop 50 Round 1- 2005/6 Grant received-Prop 50 Round 1- 2005/6 $12.5 million - 10% minimum match Conservation and Recycling projects Prop 50 round 2- 2007 Prop 50 round 2- 2007 -Policy decision-focus on storm water/ floodplains/ watersheds -Step 1Proposal evaluated based on BAIRWMP -Step 1Proposal evaluated based on BAIRWMP -Not invited to step 2 -Not invited to step 2 Supplemental Prop 50 -2010 Supplemental Prop 50 -2010 Max. $3.7 m –Not invited to step 2 Max. $3.7 m –Not invited to step 2

7. Bay Area IRWMP Regional Function/ REGIONAL ENTITIES Water Supply and Water Quality *Bay Area Water Agencies Coalition- BAWAC Wastewater and Recycled Water *Bay Area Clean Water Agencies- BACWA http://www.bacwa.org/ http://www.bacwa.org/ Flood Protection and Stormwater Management Bay Area Flood Protection Agencies Association BAFPAA Watershed Management/Habitat Protection and Restoration Bay Area Watershed Network BAWN

8. Bay Area IRWMP CC

9. BAWAC Outgrowth of Water Recycling program Outgrowth of Water Recycling program Created to respond to IRWM concept Created to respond to IRWM concept Includes all major water agencies in 9 counties Includes all major water agencies in 9 counties Emphasis on Conservation Emphasis on Conservation New technologies New technologies Refining existing programs Refining existing programs Evaluating regional opportunities Evaluating regional opportunities

10. BACWA Existed since 1984 Existed since 1984 Joint Powers Agreement Joint Powers Agreement All major Publicly Owned Treatment Works in all 9 counties All major Publicly Owned Treatment Works in all 9 counties Emphasis on Water Recycling Emphasis on Water Recycling Lead for $12.5 million IRWM state grant Lead for $12.5 million IRWM state grant

11. BAFPAA Concept developed in 2006 in response to IRWM. Concept developed in 2006 in response to IRWM. Represents the 9 Bay Area counties and communities in regional and statewide issues in the area of flood protection Represents the 9 Bay Area counties and communities in regional and statewide issues in the area of flood protection Approval of the Rules of Governance by the counties or agencies occurred from 2006-2009. Approval of the Rules of Governance by the counties or agencies occurred from 2006-2009. Collaboration on: Collaboration on: IRWMP, IRWMP, USACE Levee Vegetation Policy USACE Levee Vegetation Policy

12. BAWN Concept developed in 2006 Concept developed in 2006 Hosted by RWQCB/ SFEP Hosted by RWQCB/ SFEP Next Annual meeting- February 10,2012 Next Annual meeting- February 10,2012 Workgroups established: Workgroups established: Policy Policy Outreach and Education Outreach and Education Monitoring and Assessment Monitoring and Assessment Water and Land Use Water and Land Use IRWMP Coordination IRWMP Coordination

13. Watershed Management/Habitat Protection and Restoration (Watershed) Component November 2006-Functional Area Component November 2006-Functional Area Component State Coastal Conservancy State Coastal Conservancy Excellent summary of watersheds and needs Excellent summary of watersheds and needs Can be found on www.bairmp.org website Can be found on www.bairmp.org website

14. BAFPAA/BAWN Joint Conference June 16,2011-Flood Protection – Watershed Restoration Joint Workshop June 16,2011-Flood Protection – Watershed Restoration Joint Workshop Over 100 people attended Over 100 people attended Emphasis on Integration Emphasis on Integration Focus on “sub regions” Focus on “sub regions”

15. Prop 84 Changes Changes Regional Acceptance Process Regional Acceptance Process Sub regions/ allocations Sub regions/ allocations Project prioritization Project prioritization Prop 84 PSP and Grant requirements Prop 84 PSP and Grant requirements -One applicant & Scoring Process -Cost /Benefit -Cost /Benefit Bay Area Implementation Grant Bay Area Implementation Grant 1-E funding 1-E funding

16. Prop 84 Nov. 2006 - $5.4 billion total - allocated funds by “Region” -added “Climate Change” to plan -added “ Relation to local land use” to plan Total ~ $1 billion for implementing IRWMPs 25% match

17. Prop 84 $1 Billion for IRWM $900M Allocated to 11 Funding Areas $900M Allocated to 11 Funding Areas $100M Interregional $100M Interregional Prop 1E $300M for Storm Water Flood Management Requires consistency with IRWM Plan Requires consistency with IRWM Plan $ in millions

19. Region Acceptance Process Required under Prop 84 Required under Prop 84 2009 Process 2009 Process Important Themes for Bay Area Important Themes for Bay Area - Consensus Approach - Developing sub-regions - Ability to rank projects - Developing “Regional” projects

20. Region Acceptance Process

21. DWR decisions in September 2009 RAP Summary RAP Summary 46 Regions submitted 46 Regions submitted Approved – 34 Regions Approved – 34 Regions Conditional Approval – 11 Conditional Approval – 11 Not Approved – 1 Region Not Approved – 1 Region Final-all approved-10 conditionally Final-all approved-10 conditionally 3 address entire funding area 3 address entire funding area

22. Regional Acceptance Process IRWM Regions 36Approved Regions 10Conditionally Approved Regions

23. Sub-regions were created to foster outreach, foster outreach, coordination, coordination, project solicitation, and project solicitation, and project integration project integration

24. Bay Area Sub Regions

26. Decision-Subareas and Funding *Target Allocations (After Regional project allocation)- ½-No. of sub regions, ¼ pop. ¼ area -N bay- 25% -E bay-29 % -S bay-25% -W bay-22%

27. Project Prioritization 2006 plan used “cohorts” 2006 plan used “cohorts” -Evaluated but did not rank projects -Evaluation can be converted to a score and ranking

28. Project Evaluation

29. Prop 84 PSP and Grant requirements *One applicant *One applicant *Scoring process *Scoring process * Cost/Benefit * Cost/Benefit

30. GUIDELINES August 2010 The IRWM Grant Program is designed to encourage integrated regional strategies for management of water resources and to provide funding for both planning and implementation projects that support integrated water management http://www.water.ca.gov/irwm/docs/Guidelines/Pro p84/GL_Final_07_20_10.pdf http://www.water.ca.gov/irwm/docs/Guidelines/Pro p84/GL_Final_07_20_10.pdf http://www.water.ca.gov/irwm/docs/Guidelines/Pro p84/GL_Final_07_20_10.pdf http://www.water.ca.gov/irwm/docs/Guidelines/Pro p84/GL_Final_07_20_10.pdf

31. Direct Objectives Improve water supply reliability Improve water supply reliability Protect & improve water quality Protect & improve water quality Ensure sustainability through environmental stewardship Ensure sustainability through environmental stewardship Higher-Level Objectives Promote regional planning Promote regional planning Financial incentive to promote integration and regional cooperation and collaboration Financial incentive to promote integration and regional cooperation and collaboration

32. Scoring 84 50 Workplan1515 Funding match /////// 5 (10%) Scientific Merit ////////15 F. A Balance? (5)//// Budget55 Schedule55 Mon. & Ass..& Perf. Meas. 55 WS-Econ. Anal.-Cost/benefit (20)-> 15 15 W Q & Other benefits (5)-> 15 10 Flood Damage-C/B 15? Program Preferences 105 Total8580

33. Bay Area Implementation grant “Regional” Projects “Regional” Projects One applicant-BACWA One applicant-BACWA Cost Benefit Analysis Cost Benefit Analysis

34. Projects Regional Recycling Grant request Regional Recycling Grant request ($10 m) Regional Water Conservation Regional Water Conservation ($ 9.203 m) Regional Green Infrastructure Capacity Building Regional Green Infrastructure Capacity Building ($4.316 m) Bay Area Wetland Ecosystem Restoration Program Bay Area Wetland Ecosystem Restoration Program ($ 3.75 m) Integrated Water Quality Improvement, Flood Management and Ecosystem Restoration in Bay Area Disadvantaged Communities ( $2.2 m) Integrated Water Quality Improvement, Flood Management and Ecosystem Restoration in Bay Area Disadvantaged Communities ( $2.2 m) Admin-($.643 m) Admin-($.643 m) Total-~ $30.094 m

35. Recycling-North Bay NBWRA Projects NBWRA Projects Novato North- NMWD- $ 500k Novato North- NMWD- $ 500k Novato South-Hamilton-LGVSD - $ 500k Novato South-Hamilton-LGVSD - $ 500k Napa State Hospital-Napa San.- $ 500k Napa State Hospital-Napa San.- $ 500k Sonoma Valley- SCVSD/ SCWA- $ 500k Sonoma Valley- SCVSD/ SCWA- $ 500k Peacock Gap- MMWD- $ 500k Peacock Gap- MMWD- $ 500k Total= $2.5 m Total= $2.5 m

36. Regional Recycling Match-$, 55,815 m (85 %) Match-$, 55,815 m (85 %) Acre feet/ year- 3,210 AFY Acre feet/ year- 3,210 AFY Costs- $53 m (50 years)- 2009 dollars Costs- $53 m (50 years)- 2009 dollars Benefits- ~ $ 108 m Benefits- ~ $ 108 m Avoided alternative water supply project costs Avoided alternative water supply project costs Avoided potable water supply costs Avoided potable water supply costs ~ $1m- WQ avoided fertilizer costs ~ $1m- WQ avoided fertilizer costs

37. Water Conservation Components

38. Conservation- North Bay City of Napa- $330 k City of Napa- $330 k SCWA $765 k SCWA $765 k Solano $ 692 k Solano $ 692 k MMWD $ 863 k MMWD $ 863 k 31.6 % of $ 8.39 m 31.6 % of $ 8.39 m General- 31.6 % of $ 562 k = $178 k General- 31.6 % of $ 562 k = $178 k + Napa Rainwater = $250 k + Napa Rainwater = $250 k Total $ 3.078 m Total $ 3.078 m

39. Regional Water Conservation Match $ 6,438,872 (42 %) Total- ~ $15.4 m Acre feet- 25,546 over 10 years Cost / acre –ft- ~ $605 2009 costs- $12.7 m Benefit- 10 year present value- ~ $ 25 m

40. Regional Green Infrastructure North Bay No North bay projects No North bay projects Napa Rainwater harvesting shifted to conservation for administration purposes. Napa Rainwater harvesting shifted to conservation for administration purposes.

41. Bay Area Wetlands –North bay Sears Point- $1.25 m Sears Point- $1.25 m

42. Wetlands State Coastal Conservancy lead-3 projects State Coastal Conservancy lead-3 projects $3.725 m request, $16.53 m match + other state funds ($8.9 m)-57% match $3.725 m request, $16.53 m match + other state funds ($8.9 m)-57% match 2009 annualized costs- ~$ 25 m 2009 annualized costs- ~$ 25 m 2009 annualized benefits ~ $ 130 m 2009 annualized benefits ~ $ 130 m

43. Integrated… Components 1. Watershed Partnership Technical Assistance ( $150 k) 2. Stream Restoration with Schools and Community in Disadvantaged Communities of the North Bay (STRAW) ($200 k) 3. Floodplain Mapping for the Bay Area with Disadvantaged Communities Focus ( $712 k) 4. Storm Water Improvements and Flood Reduction Strategies Pilot Project in Bay Point ($160 k) 5. Disadvantaged Communities Richmond Shoreline and City of San Pablo Flood Project ( $85 k) 6. Pescadero Creek Watershed Disadvantaged Communities Integrated Flood Reduction and Habitat Enhancement Project($100 k) 7. Pescadero Creek Steelhead Smolt Outmigrant Trapping( $119 k) 8. Stream Channel Shapes and Floodplain Restoration Guidance and Watershed Restoration in San Francisquito Creek, East Palo Alto, a Disadvantaged Community ($230 k) 9. Steelhead and Coho: Bay Area Indicator for Restoration Success SF Estuary Steelhead Monitoring Program($379 k)

44. Integrated Water Quality Improvement, Flood Management and Ecosystem Restoration in Bay Area Disadvantaged Communities North Bay North Bay -STRAW ( PRBO)- $200k General mapping and watershed assistance share of ($862 k) General mapping and watershed assistance share of ($862 k) 25% - $ 216k North bay share of $379 for Steelhead Napa and Sonoma ~$ 250 k

45. Integrated Water Quality Improvement, Flood Management and Ecosystem Restoration in Bay Area Disadvantaged Communities Total request- $2.134 m Total request- $2.134 m Match- -$705 k - 33 % Match- -$705 k - 33 % Consolidation of prior proposals and emphasis on DACs Consolidation of prior proposals and emphasis on DACs 2009 annualized costs-$1.6 m Benefits- $ 2.1 m ( stormwater treatment- STRAW)

46. North Bay Share Project Funds requested North bay share % Recycling $10 m $ 2.5 m $ 2.5 m 25 % 25 % Conservation $ 9.202 m $ 3.078 m $ 3.078 m ~ 33.4 % Green Infrastructure $4.315 m 0 0 Wetlands $3.75 m $1.25 m $1.25 m 33.3 % 33.3 % Integrated…DAC $ 2.182 m $ 2.182 m ~ $666k ~ 30 % Total ~ $ 29.5 m ~ $ 7.49 m ~25 % ~25 %

47. 1-E-Stormwater Flood Management (SWFM) grants Projects Projects -Manage stormwater runoff to reduce flooding and are ready, or nearly ready, to proceed to implementation - Consistent with applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board Basin Plans, not be part of the State Plan of Flood Control and -Yield multiple benefits which may include groundwater recharge, water quality improvements, ecosystem restoration benefits, and reduction of instream erosion and sedimentation. -In IRWM Plan $ 212 m statewide competition $ 212 m statewide competition 50% match, Max $ 30 m

48. 1-E results Sep. 21 DWR Draft Funding recommendations http://www.water.ca.gov/irwm/integregio_stormwaterflood.cfm Sep. 21 DWR Draft Funding recommendations http://www.water.ca.gov/irwm/integregio_stormwaterflood.cfm http://www.water.ca.gov/irwm/integregio_stormwaterflood.cfm -41 Applicants for $ 265 m - 18 recommended for $163 million - 4/5 approved for Bay Area for ~ $67 m SFPUC- $24m, SCVWD-$25 m, San Francisquito Creek JPA-$ 8m Not funded- Redwood City Pump station-$ 8 m North bay Marin County FCWCD/ MMWD Marin County FCWCD/ MMWD -Phoenix Lake- $7.66m -Phoenix Lake- $7.66m

49. Plan Update and Projects Elements and schedule Elements and schedule Emphasis on integration Emphasis on integration Project Template Project Template Future County Meetings Future County Meetings Maps? Maps?

50. BAIRWMP Plan Proposal Submitted September 27, 2010 Submitted September 27, 2010 MMWD is applicant MMWD is applicant Grant request-$842,556 Grant request-$842,556 Match- $569,761 ( ~ 40 %) Match- $569,761 ( ~ 40 %) Cash- $210,494 Cash- $210,494 In kind- $359,267 In kind- $359,267 Includes- SVCSD -Groundwater plan Includes- SVCSD -Groundwater plan Salt and Nutrient Management Planning $205k request & 50% match ( 25 % cash, 25% in kind)

51. Plan Elements 1 Governance 1 Governance 2 Region Description 2 Region Description 3 Objectives 3 Objectives 4 Resource Management Strategies 4 Resource Management Strategies 5 Integration or Supporting Strategies – SCWA Groundwater 5 Integration or Supporting Strategies – SCWA Groundwater 6 Project Review Process 6 Project Review Process 7 Impacts and Benefits 7 Impacts and Benefits 8 Plan Performance and Monitoring 8 Plan Performance and Monitoring 9 Data Management 9 Data Management 10 Financing 10 Financing 11 Technical Analysis 11 Technical Analysis 12 Relation to Local Water Planning 12 Relation to Local Water Planning 13 Relation to Local Land Use Planning 13 Relation to Local Land Use Planning 14a Stakeholder Involvement / Part I – Outreach – General 14a Stakeholder Involvement / Part I – Outreach – General 14b Stakeholder Involvement / Part II – Outreach – DAC & Tribal 14b Stakeholder Involvement / Part II – Outreach – DAC & Tribal 14c Stakeholder Involvement / Part III – Outreach – Local Govt. 14c Stakeholder Involvement / Part III – Outreach – Local Govt. 14d Stakeholder Involvement / Part IV – Plan Update 14d Stakeholder Involvement / Part IV – Plan Update 15 Coordination 15 Coordination 16 Climate Change 16 Climate Change 17 Preparation of Updated IRWM Plan 17 Preparation of Updated IRWM Plan

52. 6.PROJECT REVIEW PROCESS 6.PROJECT REVIEW PROCESS Subtasks : Subtasks : Document process for submitting a project for inclusion in the IRWM Plan; Document process for submitting a project for inclusion in the IRWM Plan; Develop and implement review process for projects considered for inclusion into the IRWM Plan; Develop and implement review process for projects considered for inclusion into the IRWM Plan; Support sub-regional project review process Support sub-regional project review process Add new regional projects into the Plan Add new regional projects into the Plan Add new sub-regional projects into the Plan Add new sub-regional projects into the Plan Update prioritization of implementation projects Update prioritization of implementation projects Develop and implement procedure for communicating the list of selected projects Develop and implement procedure for communicating the list of selected projects Schedule- ~ Sep. 2011- June 2012 Schedule- ~ Sep. 2011- June 2012

53. Plan Update Schedule http://bairwmp.org/events/coordinating- commitee-meetings/cc-meetings-2011/cc- meeting-december- 19/CC%20Attachments%2012-19-2011.pdf http://bairwmp.org/events/coordinating- commitee-meetings/cc-meetings-2011/cc- meeting-december- 19/CC%20Attachments%2012-19-2011.pdf http://bairwmp.org/events/coordinating- commitee-meetings/cc-meetings-2011/cc- meeting-december- 19/CC%20Attachments%2012-19-2011.pdf http://bairwmp.org/events/coordinating- commitee-meetings/cc-meetings-2011/cc- meeting-december- 19/CC%20Attachments%2012-19-2011.pdf Overall Schedule Overall Schedule December 2011- August 2013 Project Review Process Project Review Process Now- > November 2012

54. 2009 -North Bay Process designed for grant submittal Include Solano Include Solano Lead for Sub- region-NBWA Lead for Sub- region-NBWA NBWA Watershed Council will advise NBWA Watershed Council will advise Propose 3 steps Propose 3 steps 1) Meeting of all counties to review Guidance 1) Meeting of all counties to review Guidance 2) Integrated County meetings to include all stakeholders 2) Integrated County meetings to include all stakeholders 3) All counties in one meeting to review input 3) All counties in one meeting to review input

55. North Bay Approach Plan Update County Leads * Liz Lewis, Marin County(Chris Choo) *Rick Thomasser, Napa County *Dave Okita, Solano County Water Agency (Chris Lee) * Brad Sherwood, Sonoma County Water Agency

56. Next Steps North Bay Process for Plan Update 1) Meeting of all county leads- Nov. 2011 -develop guidance - update stakeholder lists 2) County meetings- early 2012 -develop preliminary list of projects - emphasis on integrated projects 3) Meeting of all county leads - to review input Spring 2012

57. Projects Template Template http://bairwmp.org/docs/irwmp- projects/IRWMP%20Project%20Template%20 Updated_06.07.10.doc/view http://bairwmp.org/docs/irwmp- projects/IRWMP%20Project%20Template%20 Updated_06.07.10.doc/view Used for Prop 84 Round 1 Used for Prop 84 Round 1

58. Template Outline Project Name: Project Name: Responsible agency: Responsible agency: Other Participating Agencies: Other Participating Agencies: Summary Description: Summary Description: Prop 50 Water Management Strategies: Prop 50 Water Management Strategies: Primary Water Strategy: Primary Water Strategy: Project Benefits (Prop 84) Project Benefits (Prop 84) Purpose and Need: Purpose and Need: Project Status and Schedule: Project Status and Schedule: Readiness to Proceed: Readiness to Proceed: Integration with Other Activities: Integration with Other Activities: Cost and Financing: Cost and Financing:

59. Template Outline (cont’d) Benefits and Impacts: Benefits and Impacts: Disadvantaged Communities/ Environmental Justice: Disadvantaged Communities/ Environmental Justice: Environmental Compliance Strategy: Environmental Compliance Strategy: Statewide Priorities: Statewide Priorities: Stakeholder Involvement and Coordination: Stakeholder Involvement and Coordination: Documentation of Feasibility: Documentation of Feasibility: Detailed Project Description: Detailed Project Description:

60. New Draft Project Submittal Form 1) Concept 2) Collaboration 3) Detailed Project Information for Scoring 4) Cost- Benefits

61. Concept - Name of Project - Name of Project Subregion (check all that apply)□ North□ East□ South□ West Subregion (check all that apply)□ North□ East□ South□ West County(ies) County(ies) Sponsoring agency/organization Sponsoring agency/organization Other participating or partnering agencies/organizations Other participating or partnering agencies/organizations Contact person Contact person Contact person e-mail Contact person e-mail Contact person phone Contact person phone Basic project description Basic project description Project website (if any) Project website (if any) Estimated project cost Estimated project cost Does the agency/organization have the required 25% matching funds? □ Yes □ No Does the agency/organization have the required 25% matching funds? □ Yes □ No Estimated project completion date Estimated project completion date

62. Collaboration This section includes information that may be useful to others to determine if one or more projects could be combined to make a more integrated project with multiple benefits and thus more competitive for grant purposes. This section includes information that may be useful to others to determine if one or more projects could be combined to make a more integrated project with multiple benefits and thus more competitive for grant purposes. In what watershed tributary is the project located? In what watershed tributary is the project located? Will project be located on public or private land? Will project be located on public or private land? Indicate if the project is an element or phase of a regional or larger program and, if so, what the regional or larger program is. Indicate if the project is an element or phase of a regional or larger program and, if so, what the regional or larger program is.

63. Details for Scoring Detailed Project Description Detailed Project Description Provide a detailed description of the project including the general project concept, what will be constructed/implemented, how the constructed project will function, and treatment methods, as appropriate, etc. Provide a detailed description of the project including the general project concept, what will be constructed/implemented, how the constructed project will function, and treatment methods, as appropriate, etc. Indicate if the project is an element or phase of a regional or larger program and, if so, what the regional or larger program is. Indicate if the project is an element or phase of a regional or larger program and, if so, what the regional or larger program is. Proposed construction/implementation start date Proposed construction/implementation start date Proposed construction/implementation completion date Proposed construction/implementation completion date Indicate the status of the following: Indicate the status of the following: Conceptual plans Conceptual plans Land acquisition/easements Land acquisition/easements Preliminary plans Preliminary plans CEQA/NEPA CEQA/NEPA Construction drawings (including percent completion) Construction drawings (including percent completion) Funding Funding Readiness to proceed Readiness to proceed List documents that contain information specific to the propose project description and links to those that may be found online. List documents that contain information specific to the propose project description and links to those that may be found online. Detailed Project Location Detailed Project Location Latitude Latitude Longitude Longitude List any applicable surface water bodies and groundwater basins associated with the proposed project. List any applicable surface water bodies and groundwater basins associated with the proposed project. Project Need Project Need Provide a description of the need(s) or problem(s) that the project will address. As applicable, discuss the water supply need, operational efficiency need, water quality need, or resource stewardship [e.g. ecosystem restoration, floodplain management] need. Discuss critical impacts that will occur if the proposal is not implemented. Provide a description of the need(s) or problem(s) that the project will address. As applicable, discuss the water supply need, operational efficiency need, water quality need, or resource stewardship [e.g. ecosystem restoration, floodplain management] need. Discuss critical impacts that will occur if the proposal is not implemented. List any additional documents that contain information specific to the needs of the propose project and links to those that may be found online. List any additional documents that contain information specific to the needs of the propose project and links to those that may be found online.

64. Details for Scoring (cont’d) Project Benefits Project Benefits Provide a detailed descriptive summary of the benefit(s) that the project will address. These should include benefits to any of the following that may apply: Provide a detailed descriptive summary of the benefit(s) that the project will address. These should include benefits to any of the following that may apply: Water Supply (conservation, recycled water, groundwater recharge, surface storage, etc.) Water Supply (conservation, recycled water, groundwater recharge, surface storage, etc.) Water Quality Water Quality Flood Management Flood Management Resource Stewardship (watershed management, habitat protection and restoration, recreation, open space, etc.) Resource Stewardship (watershed management, habitat protection and restoration, recreation, open space, etc.) Does the project reduce water supply demands on the Bay/Delta Estuary? Does the project reduce water supply demands on the Bay/Delta Estuary? Does the project address any known environmental justice issues? Does the project address any known environmental justice issues? Is the project located within or adjacent to a disadvantaged community? Is the project located within or adjacent to a disadvantaged community? Does the project include disadvantaged community participation? Does the project include disadvantaged community participation?

65. Details for Scoring (cont’d) Detailed Project Costs Detailed Project Costs Lower estimated total capital cost Lower estimated total capital cost Upper estimated total capital cost Upper estimated total capital cost Land/easement cost Land/easement cost Annual operations and maintenance cost Annual operations and maintenance cost Funding source for annual operations and maintenance Funding source for annual operations and maintenance Design life of the project (years) Design life of the project (years) Statewide Priorities ( check all that the project addresses) Statewide Priorities ( check all that the project addresses) □ Drought Preparedness □ Drought Preparedness □ Use and Reuse Water More Efficiently □ Use and Reuse Water More Efficiently □ Climate Change Response Actions □ Climate Change Response Actions □ Expand Environmental Stewardship □ Expand Environmental Stewardship □ Practice Integrated Flood Management □ Practice Integrated Flood Management □ Protect Surface and Groundwater Quality □ Protect Surface and Groundwater Quality □ Improve Tribal Water and Natural Resources □ Improve Tribal Water and Natural Resources □ Ensure Equitable Distribution of Benefits □ Ensure Equitable Distribution of Benefits

66. Details for Scoring (cont’d) California Water Plan Resource Management Strategies (check all that apply). Please see page 45 of Proposition 84 and Proposition 1E Guidelines dated August 2010. California Water Plan Resource Management Strategies (check all that apply). Please see page 45 of Proposition 84 and Proposition 1E Guidelines dated August 2010. □ Reduce Water Demand □ Reduce Water Demand □ Improved Operational Efficiency and Transfers □ Improved Operational Efficiency and Transfers □ Increase Water Supply □ Increase Water Supply □ Improve Water Quality □ Improve Water Quality □ Improve Flood Management □ Improve Flood Management □ Practice Resources Stewardship □ Practice Resources Stewardship □ Other Strategies □ Other Strategies Eligibility Criteria Eligibility Criteria □ Groundwater Management Plan □ Groundwater Management Plan □ Urban Water Management Plan □ Urban Water Management Plan □ Water Meter Requirements □ Water Meter Requirements □ Groundwater Monitoring Requirements □ Groundwater Monitoring Requirements

67. Details for Scoring (cont’d) Multiple Benefits – for Proposition 84 grants (check all that apply – at least one must be checked) □ Water supply reliability, water conservation and water use efficiency □ Water supply reliability, water conservation and water use efficiency □ Stormwater capture, storage, clean-up, treatment, and management □ Stormwater capture, storage, clean-up, treatment, and management □ Removal of invasive non-native species, the creation and enhancement of wetlands, and the acquisition, protection, and restoration of open space and watershed lands □ Removal of invasive non-native species, the creation and enhancement of wetlands, and the acquisition, protection, and restoration of open space and watershed lands □ Non-point source pollution reduction, management and monitoring □ Non-point source pollution reduction, management and monitoring □ Groundwater recharge and management projects □ Groundwater recharge and management projects □ Contaminant and salt removal through reclamation, desalting, and other treatment technologies and conveyance of reclaimed water for distribution to users □ Contaminant and salt removal through reclamation, desalting, and other treatment technologies and conveyance of reclaimed water for distribution to users □ Water banking, exchange, reclamation and improvement of water quality □ Water banking, exchange, reclamation and improvement of water quality □ Planning and implementation of multipurpose flood management programs □ Planning and implementation of multipurpose flood management programs □ Watershed protection and management □ Watershed protection and management □ Drinking water treatment and distribution □ Drinking water treatment and distribution □ Ecosystem and fisheries restoration and protection □ Ecosystem and fisheries restoration and protection Exceptions to above (if none are checked) Exceptions to above (if none are checked) □ Projects that directly address a critical water quality or supply issue in a DAC □ Projects that directly address a critical water quality or supply issue in a DAC □ Urban water suppliers implementing certain BMPs as on page 17 of Guidelines □ Urban water suppliers implementing certain BMPs as on page 17 of Guidelines

68. Details for Scoring (cont’d) Bay Area IRWM Plan Goals and Objectives (check all that apply) Bay Area IRWM Plan Goals and Objectives (check all that apply) Promotion of economic, social, and environmental sustainability □ Avoiding, minimizing, and mitigating net impacts to environment □ Avoiding, minimizing, and mitigating net impacts to environment □ Maintaining and promoting economic and environmental sustainability through sound water resources management practices □ Maintaining and promoting economic and environmental sustainability through sound water resources management practices □ Maximizing external support and partnerships □ Maximizing external support and partnerships □ Maximizing ability to get outside funding □ Maximizing ability to get outside funding □ Maximizing economies of scale and governmental efficiencies □ Maximizing economies of scale and governmental efficiencies □ Providing trails and recreation opportunities □ Providing trails and recreation opportunities □ Protecting cultural resources □ Protecting cultural resources □ Increasing community outreach and education for watershed health □ Increasing community outreach and education for watershed health □ Maximizing community involvement and stewardship □ Maximizing community involvement and stewardship □ Reducing energy use and/or use renewable resources where appropriate □ Reducing energy use and/or use renewable resources where appropriate □ Minimizing solid waste generation/maximize reuse □ Minimizing solid waste generation/maximize reuse □ Engaging public agencies, businesses, and the public in stormwater pollution prevention and watershed management, including decision -making □ Engaging public agencies, businesses, and the public in stormwater pollution prevention and watershed management, including decision -making □ Achieving community awareness of local flood risks, including potential risks in areas protected by existing projects □ Achieving community awareness of local flood risks, including potential risks in areas protected by existing projects □ Considering and addressing disproportionate community impacts □ Considering and addressing disproportionate community impacts □ Balancing needs for all beneficial uses of water □ Balancing needs for all beneficial uses of water □ Securing funds to implement solutions □ Securing funds to implement solutions

69. Details for Scoring (cont’d) Improved supply reliability □ Meeting future and dry year demands □ Meeting future and dry year demands □ Maximizing water use efficiency □ Maximizing water use efficiency □ Minimizing vulnerability of infrastructure to catastrophes and security breaches □ Minimizing vulnerability of infrastructure to catastrophes and security breaches □ Maximizing control within the Bay Area region □ Maximizing control within the Bay Area region □ Preserving highest quality supplies for highest use □ Preserving highest quality supplies for highest use □ Protecting against overdraft □ Protecting against overdraft □ Providing for groundwater recharge while maintaining groundwater resources □ Providing for groundwater recharge while maintaining groundwater resources □ Increasing opportunities for recycled water use consistent with health and safety □ Increasing opportunities for recycled water use consistent with health and safety □ Maintaining a diverse portfolio of water supplies to maximize flexibility □ Maintaining a diverse portfolio of water supplies to maximize flexibility □ Securing funds to implement solutions □ Securing funds to implement solutions

70. Details for Scoring (cont’d) Protection and improvement of the quality of water resources □ Minimizing point and non-point source pollution □ Minimizing point and non-point source pollution □ Reducing salinity-related problems □ Reducing salinity-related problems □ Reducing mass loading of pollutants to surface waters □ Reducing mass loading of pollutants to surface waters □ Minimizing taste and odor problems □ Minimizing taste and odor problems □ Preserving natural stream buffers and floodplains to improve filtration of point and non-point source pollutants □ Preserving natural stream buffers and floodplains to improve filtration of point and non-point source pollutants □ Maintaining health of whole watershed, upland vegetation and land cover to reduce runoff quantity and improve runoff quality □ Maintaining health of whole watershed, upland vegetation and land cover to reduce runoff quantity and improve runoff quality □ Protecting surface and groundwater resources from pollution and degradation □ Protecting surface and groundwater resources from pollution and degradation □ Anticipating emerging contaminants □ Anticipating emerging contaminants □ Eliminating non-stormwater pollutant discharges to storm drains □ Eliminating non-stormwater pollutant discharges to storm drains □ Reducing pollutants in runoff to the maximum extent practicable □ Reducing pollutants in runoff to the maximum extent practicable □ Periodically evaluating beneficial uses □ Periodically evaluating beneficial uses □ Continuously improving stormwater pollution prevention methods □ Continuously improving stormwater pollution prevention methods □ Securing funds to implement solutions □ Securing funds to implement solutions

71. Details for Scoring (cont’d) Protection of public health, safety, and property □ Providing clean, safe, reliable drinking water □ Providing clean, safe, reliable drinking water □ Minimizing variability for treatment □ Minimizing variability for treatment □ Advancing technology through feasibility studies/demonstrations □ Advancing technology through feasibility studies/demonstrations □ Meeting promulgated and expected drinking water quality standards □ Meeting promulgated and expected drinking water quality standards □ Managing floodplains to reduce flood damages to homes, businesses, schools, and transportation □ Managing floodplains to reduce flood damages to homes, businesses, schools, and transportation □ Minimizing health impacts associated with polluted waterways □ Minimizing health impacts associated with polluted waterways □ Achieving effective floodplain management by encouraging wise use and management of flood-prone areas □ Achieving effective floodplain management by encouraging wise use and management of flood-prone areas □ Maintaining performance of flood protection and stormwater facilities □ Maintaining performance of flood protection and stormwater facilities □ Partnering with municipalities to prepare mitigation action plans that reduce flood risks to the community □ Partnering with municipalities to prepare mitigation action plans that reduce flood risks to the community □ Coordinating resources and mutual aid between agencies to enhance agency effectiveness □ Coordinating resources and mutual aid between agencies to enhance agency effectiveness □ Securing funds to implement solutions □ Securing funds to implement solutions

72. Details for Scoring (cont’d) Creation, protection, enhancement, and maintenance of environmental resources and habitats Creation, protection, enhancement, and maintenance of environmental resources and habitats □ Providing net benefits to environment □ Providing net benefits to environment □ Conserving and restoring habitat for species protection □ Conserving and restoring habitat for species protection □ Acquiring, protecting and/or restoring wetlands, streams, and riparian areas □ Acquiring, protecting and/or restoring wetlands, streams, and riparian areas □ Enhancing wildlife populations and biodiversity (species richness) □ Enhancing wildlife populations and biodiversity (species richness) □ Providing lifecycle support (shelter, reproduction, feeding) □ Providing lifecycle support (shelter, reproduction, feeding) □ Protecting and recovering fisheries (natural habitat and harvesting) □ Protecting and recovering fisheries (natural habitat and harvesting) □ Protecting wildlife movement/wildlife corridors □ Protecting wildlife movement/wildlife corridors □ Managing pests and invasive species □ Managing pests and invasive species □ Recovering at-risk native and special status species □ Recovering at-risk native and special status species □ Improving structural complexity (riparian and channel) □ Improving structural complexity (riparian and channel) □ Designing and constructing natural flood protection and stormwater facilities □ Designing and constructing natural flood protection and stormwater facilities □ Securing funds to implement solutions □ Securing funds to implement solutions

73. Details for Scoring (cont’d) Climate Change ( check all those that indicate to what extent the project contributes to climate change response actions) Climate Change ( check all those that indicate to what extent the project contributes to climate change response actions) Adaptation to Climate Change Adaptation to Climate Change □ Increases water supply reliability □ Increases water supply reliability □ Advances/ expands conjunctive management of multiple water supply sources □ Advances/ expands conjunctive management of multiple water supply sources □ Increases water use and/or reuse efficiency □ Increases water use and/or reuse efficiency □ Provides additional water supply □ Provides additional water supply □ Promotes water quality protection □ Promotes water quality protection □ Reduces water demand □ Reduces water demand □ Advances/expands water recycling □ Advances/expands water recycling □ Promotes urban runoff reuse □ Promotes urban runoff reuse □ Addresses sea level rise □ Addresses sea level rise □ Addresses other anticipated Climate Change Impact (e.g. Through water management system modifications) Please State: ________________ □ Addresses other anticipated Climate Change Impact (e.g. Through water management system modifications) Please State: ________________ □ Improves flood control (e.g. through wetlands restoration, management, protection) □ Improves flood control (e.g. through wetlands restoration, management, protection) Promotes habitat protection by: Promotes habitat protection by: □ Establishes migration corridors □ Establishes migration corridors □ Re-establishes river-floodplain hydrologic continuity □ Re-establishes river-floodplain hydrologic continuity □ Re-introduces anadromous fish populations to upper watersheds □ Re-introduces anadromous fish populations to upper watersheds □ Enhances and protects upper watershed forests and meadow systems □ Enhances and protects upper watershed forests and meadow systems □ Other (please state:_______________ □ Other (please state:_______________

74. Details for Scoring (cont’d) Climate Change Mitigation by Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions and/or Energy Consumption □ Increases water use efficiency or promotes energy-efficient water demand reduction □ Increases water use efficiency or promotes energy-efficient water demand reduction □ Improves water system energy efficiency □ Improves water system energy efficiency □ Advances/expands water recycling □ Advances/expands water recycling □ Promotes urban runoff reuse □ Promotes urban runoff reuse □ Promotes use of renewable energy sources □ Promotes use of renewable energy sources □ Contributes to carbon sequestration (e.g. through vegetation growth) □ Contributes to carbon sequestration (e.g. through vegetation growth) □ Other (please state: ___________________________________) □ Other (please state: ___________________________________) List any other project information that merits consideration List any other project information that merits consideration

75. COST-BENEFITS We could highlight some of the requested information for Prop 84 implementation grant on Cost benefit which goes well beyond scoring information in requesting dollar estimates not just narrative benefits. We could highlight some of the requested information for Prop 84 implementation grant on Cost benefit which goes well beyond scoring information in requesting dollar estimates not just narrative benefits. This could be presented as Info only with links to example tables so proponents on Notice that may be asked for more analysis BEFORE prioritization is completed. This could be presented as Info only with links to example tables so proponents on Notice that may be asked for more analysis BEFORE prioritization is completed.

76. Prop 84 ~ $100 million left for Bay Area Sub-regions and watersheds Challenges Developing more “Integrated” Projects Developing more “Integrated” Projects Including Disadvantaged Communities and Tribes Including Disadvantaged Communities and Tribes Including Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation Including Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation Responding to Grant application cycles Responding to Grant application cycles Cost/Benefit Analysis Cost/Benefit Analysis

78. $45 $76 $44 $51 $47 $132 $64 $70 $58 $198 $128 $87 $ in millions Proposed $1.05 Billion for IRWM $1B Allocated to 12 Funding Areas $50M Interregional

79. County Meetings Marin- February 9 2:00- 4:00 pm Marin- February 9 2:00- 4:00 pm -Marin County Civic Center –room 410-B Napa- February 21 5:30 - 7:30 pm Napa- February 21 5:30 - 7:30 pm - Yountville Community Center Sonoma- March 1 6:00-7:30 pm Sonoma- March 1 6:00-7:30 pm - Petaluma Solano- No meeting scheduled Solano- No meeting scheduled

80. Maps?? Questions?? Questions??